I’ll try to keep things short, and want to express that I have no need for anyone to believe me. Without stating too much of my background, this past year for me has been challenging. I was made aware of some events taking place and it has since affected me deeply. With that being said, I quickly agreed with the rumor of “catastrophic disclosure”. I know that may upset many, but it’s the truth. In the near future I do not see disclosure being a possibility. A friend of mine who’s been deeply interested in the topic, more than likely will not get the outcome he wants. In this field many just turn a blind eye and it really is in their best interest. Open to questions, I’ll try my best to answer them.
>>42282003The only interesting thing is the only part you’re not going to be specific about, though, right?>why is it so bad?
What information can you give without endangering yourself
>>42282038He can tell us very specifically how he thinks other people would feel in the hypothetical scenario wherein they were told.And that it is bad and he knows for sureBut it’s important not to tell youSo if you have any questions regarding how other people might feel if they could find out, he’ll be happy to answer that.
“What information can you give without endangering yourself“Thank you for the concern of my safety! I’ve tried to speak lightly before on Reddit and no one seemed to respect the fact that I cannot just “come out and say it”What I can say though to answer your question. A lot of information is out there already! I do believe there’s a very slow progress to insight. One more thing I can add is that, if there was any bad intentions. It would’ve happened a long time ago.
>>42282052 #If it were so simple surely someone would have came out and said it.
>>42282003>seth macfarlane imageryngmihere's your disclosure bro.
It's because of UAPs are the preferred interface of 'Trandimensional' beings. People become emotional when they consider the implications: these are the same entities that were written about in most of the ancient 'Holy' books. In the Abrahamic faiths they are called ANGELS; and so on. Crisis of identity begin to weigh heavy, especially on those who have rooted their existence in Materialism and Self-Reliance. It opens Pandora's box for a great many of the population. אמת יהו אמת
>> 42282134No this isn’t the case. It’s actually much simpler than we think.
Whether or not you know it to be the truth is irrelevant to the big picture. It is the truth. If your subjective experience of it is much simpler, you wouldn't be afraid to say more than the Larp you tried to initiate.
>> 42282184#There’s no subjective experience, just facts. There’s a big picture yes, but nothing to do with what’s been mentioned. The theories mention are nothing more than that. Afraid to say much more? NDA , retaliation? Ever hear of either
>>42282003Sigh…Any government sponsored or backed disclosure is fake and gay. This new movie? Fake and gayAll this hype about scientists missing? Fake and gayCongressmen saying they’ve seen files? You guessed it! Fake and gayYou think the government will just tell us the whole truth about one of the biggest mysteries of our reality? Come on
Humans are warmongering space niggers and the aliens are here to make sure we don't fuck up the planet too much or spread our space niggerishness to the stars.
>>42282003that's a long post just to say "nothing ever happens"larp, a believable one at least.
>>42282003If they aren’t bad cause we’d already know why not just tell us what’s going on. It displeases me how humans view other humans. Why does one get to know and not the other? Ego
>>42283083>Why does one get to know and not the other? EgoNo. Power. Control.
>>42282078>be alien>get doxxedhow the hell did you know my last name?i aint said nothing. fuck'n glow bag.
Nothing ever happens
I guess the problem with the disclosure is that it's similar to bringing a schizophrenic back down to cold hard reality from grandiose delusion, but in the case of disclosure it involves the whole collective so naturally the system is at risk. Sure, you could say the disclosure could be tied strongly to how we experience 'reality' itself and you could then formulate some extensive cope how we are on top through some monistic philosophy.
>>42282003So OP, I'm so annoyed with the term "catastrophic" here because it's to broad. Of course every think tank can come up with a reason why disclosure could be catastrophic in every field. It's literally a fear grift to keep money coming in for "Risk Assessments". Please be more specific on which life sustaining system is the first and last to go if disclosure happens.Base reality is base reality whether you know it or not.The logic just doesn't follow unless there is like an observer effect trigger clause that says "We will trigger an extinction level event with our ultratech from space/interdimension if more than x% of the global population discovers this fact". Then of course you would want to make sure that doesn't fucking happen.
