I see that image here in 4chan today, and I have seen many DNAs tests going wrong. Also always they talk about genetic editing is not taking the DNA and changing it, it's always just they putting some chemical on the animal or just doing artificial selection
>>42300368Most people are just incompetent scammers. 23&me is a great example. They have the mentality of a parasite
>>42300368no. you're dumb and should feel dumb for considering this enough to ask publicly.
>>42300368It might not be paranormal, but it's deffo real. You can isolate it pretty easily with some vodka and washing up liquid.You can show that it's really DNA doing the work with a little more effort:https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avery%E2%80%93MacLeod%E2%80%93McCarty_experiment?wprov=sfla1Doing anything useful with it takes a bit more work though.Genetic editing is taking the DNA and changing it in intentional and specific ways - mutagenesis is the random approach where they might put some chemicals on an animal. Artificial selection is any time people pick the outcome they want (ironic picrel), not how the editing/mutation came about.
>>42300368Do your thing OP but that image is not really anything to do with whether DNA exists or no, it's about shitty experiments.Someone's got to be keeping score and it sure as fuck ain't proteinshttps://x.com/i/status/1581235728893194240
Fucking DNA glowies
>>42300481I mean, if there's no proof I should believe in, the PCR thing is also very stupid, you can do it with some kinds of rock or distillate water and can show DNA if you want to
>>42300621"Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research"I know those experiments but there's no evidence that this thing is the blueprint of life
>>42300653It was in 108 labs and its happens other times too
