https://youtu.be/lTSWdHY9Ny4
>>42300683Huh, forgot all about that.
>>42300683>F=m*a>Vacuum does not have mass >therefore it can not impart a forceYou beign retarded is not "disclosure"
soft disclosure is a term conceived by tards to cope with the fact that the internet has made more and more people aware that some conspiracy theories are literally based on movie plots.
>>42303362>F=P*A>what is pressure difference high pressure next to low pressure exerts high force, especially over large areas
>>42304899Yes the high pressure pushes outOP is retarded for thinking it is the smaller pressure sucking in
>>42305522
>>42305592Are you confused about what OP believes?He thinks the vacuum surrounding the earth would "suck out" the atmospherewhich is as previously stated retarded
>>42305616okay you're a trollgood riddance
>>42305616OP obviously knows that SPACEBALL-1/MegaMaid is real, retard.
>>42305627Soooooo do you think the same thing as OP?Because OP is saying this is "soft disclosure" of the round earth model not beign real and that we live under a flat earth domewhich is?retarded
>>42305668Let me spell this out for you, you ignorant little faggot.>be ayylmao>tongue mel brooks' anus>disclose the plan to devastate mother earth>promise to take pedo elites away on interstellar lolita express to breakaway civilization and join galactic pederation>tell him to make a movie about itProve me wrong. Protip: you can't.
>>42305692Yeah that is not beign implied by the clip at allA bit too schizo take for my taste
>>42305714Because "muh flat earth" makes so much more sense>literally depicts round earthretard moron niggerfaggot
>>42305723that is what this clip is used for the mosttrust me there are a lot more flat earthers who think atmosphere can't work than ayyyylmao enjoyers such as your self
>>42305775objectively false, flat earth is enjoyed by a tiny but vocal circle of literal cucks who get paid to poast all day long from a U.S. Army cointel office
>>42305792It is possible that FE is beign astroturfed/shilled by "people"sorry about the confusion mr schizo man
>>42305926I accept your apology. I won't let them poison the well in my presence
>>42305936you are the poison
>>42306001for you
>>42300683If they left the snow on the mountains, Earth would get colder, as the snow cools the air that passes it? Most of Europe should be as cold as Siberia, but it isn't. Northern Canada, Greenland could be where they are doing this without anybody noticing.
>>42305616What happens to the pressure gradient?
well well well
>>42308110WDYM?In reality pressure just keeps droping untill it pretty much reaches 0In a non-existant flat earth model you mean?
>>42310368in reality you have high pressure (atmosphere) next to low pressure (space) and inbetween a pressure gradiant that never reaches 0
>>42310424exactlyare you asking what flat earthers say about it?
>>42300683I never noticed how shitty and low res the planet looked
>>42310464i'm asking your dumb ass
>>42310489I gave an answer>>42310368"In reality pressure just keeps droping untill it pretty much reaches 0"
>>42310502but it doesn't since you have high pressure (atmosphere) next to low pressure (space)so it doesn't drop to 0you dumb ass
>>42310506I didn't say it drops to 0almost 0/pretty much 0 is not 0technically if you have 1 atom in a cubic meter of space you have pressureand interstellar medium is about that dense
>>42310513you're a shit tier trollkill yourself
>>42310515how am i trolling exactly?I answered your question "What happens to the pressure gradient?"Pressure gradient exists on earth and goes from about 1atm at sea level to almost 0 the further you go upwhere is the issue
>>42310522you're saying 1atm exists next to 0 atmwhere is the equalization of the pressure gradient?
>>423105351atm (sealevel) exists next to 0,8atm (2km altitude)where is the uqalization between those 2?Either you don't understand what gradient is or IDK what you're asking?do you think there has to be a container for pressure gradient to exist?
>>42310546we've been talking about 0 atm of space and you're at 0.8atm
>>42310558if 1atm can exist next 0,8and 0,8 can exist next to 0,6 etc etcwhy would it suddenly be a problem at 0 exactly?considering the force is directly proportional to pressure?F=P*Asame force is pushing between 1 and 0,8 and 0,2 and 0
>>423105841atm and 0.8atm doesn't have a pressure gradient of 0neither does 0.2 to 0 or 0.4 to 0.6 or whateverthere is always a differenceit doesn't reach 0which it should
>>42310602>pressure gradient of 0A pressure gradient of 0 means there is no change in pressure>Which it shouldas in the outer space? well the pressure gradient between a vacuum and vacuum is 0
>>42300683What I think might be soft disclosure:--the whole Stargate TV show. It even lines up with having our own spacecraft made from reverse-engineered alien tech. It really does play and draw from what people ahve been believing for decades. --the movie "The Portable Door." --Close Encounters of the Third Kind--Knowing--LOST (moving and disappearing islands are as old as Avalon, Hy-Brasil, Kanehunamoku, and others).
>>42310693pressure equalizes
>>42310718obviously it doesn't considering 1atm exists at sea level and at mt. Everest there is around 0,35atmwhere exactly does the 1atm and 0,35atm "equalize"
>>42310727that's the fucking point you dumb asswhy?gravity?you're lost
>>42310734I am lost because i have no fucking idea what you are even trying to say at this pointYou stated that "pressure equalizes"when i corrected you with an examplesuddenly it doesn't?the fuck are you trying to say?gravity doesn't exist?
>>42310744good bye gravity!
>>42310749ah you are so colossally retarded you don't understand that 2yes whole 2 forces can act on an object at the same timecongrats buddy
>>42310763>the force that is strong enough to prevent the gases of the atmosphere to disperese into space is not strong enough to keep a weather balloon contained on earth:^)
>>42310803>contained on earthyou do know balloons will eventually not just float into space?
>>42310810they will burst eventually and the gases will reach their densityopposing gravity
>>42310814and buoyancy is a problem why exactly?
>>42310880it's notevery atom reaches its densityhot air is less dense and risescold air is more dense and decends gravity? irrelevant
>>42310887>every atom reaches its densityby which mechanism? or day I say force?density is just how much stuff is packed into a volume that doesn't do anything on it's own
>>42310894let me put it in retard terms for youatoms with 1 density go to 1atoms with 2 density got to 2etc
>>42310903>go toby what mechanismNewtons first states "An object remains at rest or moves in a straight line at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external net force"what force acts upon it?
>>42310920it aligns itselfair bubbles under water will rise until they reach the air (their density)rain (water) will drop and merge with the waters beloweven you can understand this
>>42310927>it aligns itselfagain by what forcethis would imply that two steel balls will just move to one another because they have the same density
>>42310942why do you care about the specific force?call it abracadabra or whatever
>>42310950because we don't see objects with same densities just "magically abracadabra or whatever" moving towards one another Katamari Damacy style
>>42310961you've reached the point of bla bla bla and lost my attention good riddance bitch
>>42310974>you've reached the pointof suggesting objects of same densities somehow coming together without an explanationCongrats on beign so intzernally inconsistent you managed to buck broke your self
pic related i guess is my add.
>>42311080why?
>>42310903>atoms with 1 density go to 1>atoms with 2 density got to 2So you think if something weighs 100N, and then you compress it into a denser volume - it will GAIN weight?Like, say, a marshmallow.According to this, if you weigh a marshmallow, and then compress it down into a smaller size - it will be heavier.Do you agree?
I think I have a good explanation for the atmosphere OP. So remember from Physics when you throw an object in the air it gradually exchanges its kinetic energy for gravitational potential energy and then the inverse after it reaches the peak of its trajectory? The average speed of an air molecule is something like 1000mph, but of course there is a distribution of speeds, with the high and low ends being exponentially more uncommon. So if you think about it, only a small portion of the atmospheric molecules are moving fast enough for their parabola's top to reach 20 miles, and proportionally even less are moving fast enough to reach 60 miles or the edge of space. To be lost the atmospheric molecules would have a high enough speed to overcome earth's escape velocity (which is the velocity where you move fast enough that earth's constant (but fading with distance) gravitational pull on you is never enough to bring you back). An internet search says Earth's escape velocity is 25000mph, which would make the percent of the atmosphere that escapes earth practically zero even for many millions of years.
>>42303820>some conspiracy theories are literally based on movie plots.the movie plots are based on the actual conspiracy
>>42305692FUCK! It all makes sense....
>>42311652It has little to do with weight. When you’re heating up air inside a hot air ballon you’re decreasing the density of the air and thus gain lift. You’re not reducing the weight of the air molecules
>>42313588>It has little to do with weight.You said it has to do with density. So answer the question.So you think if something weighs 100N, and then you compress it into a denser volume - it will GAIN weight?Like, say, a marshmallow.According to this, if you weigh a marshmallow, and then compress it down into a smaller size - it will be heavier.Do you agree?
>>42300683the reason AI logos look like anuses is that they're building the anti-christhttps://velvetshark.com/ai-company-logos-that-look-like-buttholes
>>42300683I wish she turned into a equally giant anime woman and pissed it all back onto the planet
>>42313696I gave you the answer but you didn’t understand it… you’re not adding or removing weight by increasing or decreasing density
>>42313789>I gave you the answerNo, you blathered and tried to avoid the question.>you’re not adding or removing weight by increasing or decreasing densitySo then why would density affect its movement?Weight is a force. If density doesnt change the force, then why look to density as to whether it would rise or not?
>>42313808That’s exactly why I gave you the example of a hot air balloon… Let me give you another example. You freeze 100g of water it turns into 100g of ice (frozen water) the density decreases and now the ice will float on top of water
Yes, the supposed vacuum coexisting with earths gas-pressure system usually makes the shills uncomfortable and they start blabbering about how it is cold further up hoping that it will be ignored that we are still talking about gas-pressure.
>>42313848>a hot air balloonBut you dont understand how that works, because you dont understand the simple principle I am trying to teach you.Let me give you another example.How do you determine what weight is?A simple question, no tricks, just the way to determine what something weighs.
>>42313858But anon is saying where the gas is located is determined by density.Why would expect the dense gas to go up into the vacuum?If this is all density based, then it would be expected to have all the gas next to a vacuum.
>>42313861You’re going on about weight when it has nothing to do with why something rises or falls. It’s the density that matters
>>42313876Please, just answer the simple question and it will make sense.How do we determine weight?Surely this isnt difficult for you.
>>42313880put it on scales
>>42313885Put what on scales?What are the scales doing?Why are you so scared of answering this question?
>>42313888You determine the weight of an object by putting it on scales Why don’t you just spit out your point instead of wasting my time
>>42313894What are the scales doing to determine weight?Why dont you just answer the question instead of pretending to be retarded?
>>42313899How do you weigh hydrogen (or any gas that escapes a scale because its less dense than air) mass=density×volume
>>42313935There are many ways. One would be enclosing it in something with a known weight and measuring the addition.But what IS weight?what are we measuring?What is the scale doing?why cant you answer this?If you do, then we can start to correct your understanding of why things float or sink.
>>42313858gas pressure is just the sum of the kinetic impulses (they're like billiard balls) of all the gas molecules bouncing against a surface (such as the surface of the fluid piston in a barometer or the surface of your body or the surface of a propane tank). a vacuum cleaner works the same way, it's just easy to think of it as the empty space "drawing in" the molecules rather than the physical reality of the random bouncing motion of sextillions of molecules statistically making that effect (similar to how conventional current is positive to negative although in wires the flowing electrons go in the opposite direction). >>4231178 if you imagine a bunch of these gas molecules on different kinetic trajectories, and take into account the ones moving upwards, you'll see that less and less of them have enough kinetic energy to reach higher and higher heights, leading to the atmospheric pressure decrease (remember that atmospheric pressure is measured by having the air around the barometer push a fluid piston, so since there's less air molecules per given volume on top of a mountain than at sea level there is different sum force) and eventually you get what can only practically be described as a vacuum.
>>42313947I have given you a formula how to determine mass based on density and volume Objects float or sink based on their density. Anyone can verify this. It’s empirical. 1kg of hydrogen will always rise because it’s less dense than the medium that surrounds it. 1kg of lead will always sink because it’s more dense than the medium that surrounds it
>>42313960The number one thing they get wrong is that vacuum does not suck. Pressure pushes.Makes sense to get this wrong because we live at the bottom of an ocean of air.And it pushes up as far as it can go before it falls back down like a thrown baseball.What's funny is neither model supports the idea that gas would just keep going up into vacuum forever.The density model says gas would find its density level and stop there, so either way you eventually get vacuum above pressurized gas.
>>42313978>I have given you a formula how to determine mass based on density and volumeI asked how you determine weight.Why cant you answer this?I asked you how a scale determines weight, and you cant answer.I dont think you r model is very good, if it cant answer what a scale is doing.
>>42313982It doesn’t matter whether one side pushes or the other sucks. The pressure equalizes itself until the difference is 0
>>42313994How is that possible if density determines how high something goes?
>>42314003Look at our weather… we have high pressure and low pressure systems constantly moving and changing… air that gets heated by the sun becomes less dense and rises, it cools down and sinks..
>>42314019I asked how it is possible for pressurized gas to go up into vacuum, if density is what causes things to rise or sink.
>>42314020It will go as high as its density allows that’s why air won’t float off into the vacuum of space Imagine a pool of water. If you insert an object with the same density it will remain in place, it won’t sink or rise. Increase or decrease the density of the object and it will rise or sink
>>42314040>that’s why air won’t float off into the vacuum of spaceNo container needed at all, and no problem with the gas being next to the vacuum.
I'm going to go get groceries now, i'll let you two flerfers fight it out or backpedal to retcon that one.
>>42314050Except for the pressure gradient that always equalizes Always
>>42314062it doesn't though. even without a solid barrier you can confine gas with lasers or magnets and prevent equalization by matching or exceeding the pressure force by some other force. gravity is just another force which can do this
>>42314079Yes it does, that’s hard science Also >>42310749
>>42314094https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Conceptual_Physics/Introduction_to_Physics_(Park)/03%3A_Unit_2-_Mechanics_II_-_Energy_and_Momentum_Oscillations_and_Waves_Rotation_and_Fluids/07%3A_Fluids/7.06%3A_Archimedes_Principlethere are many free resources to learn physics anon
>>42313696mass=density×volumeyou squeeze it and its volume decreases and its density increases while mass remains the same
>>42314204Pressure reaching equilibrium is hard science unlike the theory of gravity
