What does Spielberg know? Carbon dating says the Nazca mummies are 1000 to 1800 years old, but they weren't discovered until 2015. The mummies look exactly like the aliens in Close Encounters. Was Spielberg shown something back in the 70s? I don't get it.
>>42361607if it was carbon dated, it was probably some organics in the clay they used.it looked like straight clay dude i'm sorry
>>42361607>Movies == FactNGMI
>>42361607Gonna give you the benefit of the doubt OP. Think of it this way. All they have to do is make up some fake mummies and lie about how old they are. It's not THAT farfetched. Then you just make the fake mummies look like Spielberg aliens and bam, they have someone like you saying, "I don't get it"
>>42361607>Carbon dating says the Nazca mummies are 1000 to 1800 years oldNo, what you mean is some guys said carbon dating says they are that old. Those guys are deeply involved in the finding of these things. The entire testing has been dodgy.
>>42361607Nice try clayman.
Those things were featured on shows like Sightings in the early 90s. The official explanation was they were just birth defects, including the three fingers/three long toes. Now it's "their jus clay bro." lol
>>42361607they were probably wrapped in clay or somethin
>>42361668They were found in 2015 and 2016.Take your meds.
So I know the bots and shills will get mad at me, but everyone understands this thread is advertising for the movie, right?Go ahead and talk about aliens as you wish, but understand this thread is unpaid advertising.
>>42361835No they weren't. The alien looking south american mummies were news 30 years ago.At least in my timeline they were...
