Can you explain to me how you reconcile Galatians 5:14And all the homosexual sex prohibition?Every other sin in the Bible has a victim. Rape, jealousy, envy, whether the victim is someone else or the person themselves, it's there somewhere. Even if it's complicated. Sleeping around as a sin makes sense as you learn biology, we are actively dulling the pair bonding process with a type of paraphilia, and porn is a paraphilia, and prostitution as a problem makes sense. And all of these problems exist potentially inside homosexual relationships but I do not understand why it's different. I would understand the fact that it doesn't lead to procreation, but neither does celibacy and celibacy is allowed. Who is the victim? If two same sex attracted males would otherwise just spend their lives living alone and dying celibate, who is the victim of them being together?What is happening here?And I've heard all the arguments that the Greek and Hebrew words mean something different, and I've seen how all of the specifically homosexual banning passages are worded weirdly and could easily mean something else. I've seen how even the word for sexual immorality could easily mean specifically deceptive, such as cheating or lying or tricking people and etc. I just don't get it. Am I going to have to abandon the God that seemed to watch over me and provide for me for years just because it turns out He isn't actually reasonable?
The Bible speaks of agape love.Use the word: Ἀγαπήσεις (Agapēseis)Agape love is altruistic, selfless love for others.
>>42403814>>42403867Faggots
>>42403814It literally gives you diseases and parasites when you do gay stuff.But the main reason is: even though celibacy and homosex both don't produce babies, one is not using sex for anything, vs using sex for an unintended purpose. If you're gonna make babies, do it how you're supposed to (be straight), but if not, then don't do anything sexual (especially if it's defiling another man or whatever)
>>42406866>It literally gives you diseases and parasites when you do gay stuff.Only anal sex and other unhygienic practices bring diseases. Frotting isn't any more unhealthy than vaginal sex.>But the main reason is: even though celibacy and homosex both don't produce babies, one is not using sex for anything, vs using sex for an unintended purpose. If you're gonna make babies, do it how you're supposed to (be straight), but if not, then don't do anything sexual (especially if it's defiling another man or whatever)Doesn't address OP's point at all.>>42403814The best you're going to get from this board is some vague mystical nonsense like "two male energies cannot mix" or whatever.
>>42403814>Le both sides are bad OP picture>Muh victimhood and rape>Faggots are actually normal peopleHonestly if the past 30 years is to go off on an individual scale you homos are ok but when you get together in public and start to get power you are worse then women when it comes to abusing said power and acting like a victim when told to fuck off.Yet another failed normie thread bitching about politics.
because homosexuals cant procreate and breed more cattle
>>42403814It's not a first preference ever and historically was only ever done either to aggressively dominate other men (Pederasty) or out of sexual desperation (outbreaks of sodomy at all boys schools during the Victorian era).
>>42403814https://josephsciambra.com/surviving-gaybarely/
>>42403867>A GapeGreece, The birthplace of The Gay
>sexuality associated with pederasty >but who's the victim?The connection between the two was incredibly explicit historically with modern attempts to separate the them being largely in response to the negative reactions the rest of society had to the involvement of NAMBLA in early PRIDE
