Explain your arguments for/against our species evolution.Evolutionary biology/psychology underlines a lot of TRUE patterns in my worldly acknowledgements but I daren't accept we weren't 'infiltrated' during our development.
>>42405505shared traits. for example, a vertebral column, four limbs, two nostrils etc. and the fact that we consistently find the more ancestral lifeforms at the deeper geological strata (corresponding to older geological epochs). we also observe bacteria evolve antibiotic resistence. and you don't even have to believe in any of the biology to see evolution at work since it even applies to yourself, to businesses, to machine learning etc. and also there are the famous darwin finches which adapted to fill their specific ecological niches.the main arguments against it are usually that fossilization seems too unlikely to be real, that the geological timescales feel too vast to comprehend and don't seem to match the biblical narrative, that isotope dating assumes that the laws of physics didn't change over time, that evolution cannot be observed on a macro scale therefore we have no empirical evidence of morphological speciation of multicellular organisms, that fossils have been found in geological strata where they shouldn't be and also i think there is some cool creation science greenhouse where they grow giant bugs in a high oxygen atmosphere and use that to say that the firmament and dinosaurs existed along with humans.you can believe that there was some filtering but i'm not sure that's necessary to be invoked. the occam's razor explanation would be that humans simply arose in the same way that all other lifeforms did.
>>42405505Niggers ain't human>>42406666Cunt
>>42405505Nigger this is /his/ and is in no way /x/ Learn where to post you retard Also evolution does practically nothing in relation to metaphysics or /x/
>>42406655elePHONT>>42406666
Not believing in evolution belongs to /x/, not /his/, so OP's right.I believe in evolution because we observe it. Look at dog species for example, a dog from a species today looks slightly different from a dog of the same species but from the 1960s.I believe the official story of the human evolution is wrong though, too simplified, and falsified in order to avoid "raaacciiiiiism". It was not a line but a complex branch with groups mixing together, but at the end there are many different species and races, not just one.
>>42406705Evolution and the development of the brain interlinks with reptilian theory and mind control
