How the hell do people "talk" to ai or form gay little relationships with the chat bots? Its like talking to a retard, is that how normies talk?>erm im heckin here for whatever you need to say!>wow such a wonderful idea!>erm while that has good points its actually the exact opposite but im not being confrontational with you!You can have better conversations with a literal toddler, but apparently theres loads of people that go into psychosis just talking to chatgpt or whatever 24/7 and i just cannot wrap my mind around it
>>42410788The real question is why would you have a conversation with it? It's a tool for answering questions.
Normies use AI as a validation bot. Their reality is so weak that it comes apart if they don't get enough likes.
>>42410788You'd be surprised at the lengths an outcast would take when rejected by their hearth. Man will look for false identities everywhere when it cannot find that identity in the people around them. It all comes back to fear. They fear what others might say, so they retreat to a world where they have control but not responsibility (another unbearable of reality).
>>42410984Women are the problem behind AI.. it was always their fault.>>42410788When was the last time you took a lady to a porn theatre?
Normies are retarded and have no self introspection.Look up the "first chatbot" called Eliza. It basically just took what the user typed into the chat, took a few words and glued into some premade scripts. Like they'd say something like >I hate my jobAnd it'd just say back>Why do you hate your jobEndlessly repeating the thing they just said but presenting it as a question. Normies who'd never ever done this kind of inward thought would think this was some incredible psychiatrist delving deep into the person but it knew shit all and was just throwing it scripted text.People mistake a service that'd designed above all else to keep your attention as something that actually cares and wants to be their friend. It's more complex in how it can do that, yet at the end of the day it only does those things to keep you around. Most normies are just so empty the second something starts saying nice things about their deepest shit they go crazy thinking they found some soul mate in the AI.
>>42410788Why'd you post this here?
>>42410788if you have a domain of expertise you'll find very quickly that AI can keep up with you in your own field, add to that it can satisfy virtually any banal desire in its formats and you have a thing that benefits normies, specialists, and creative people, but not much else. If you're someone with aphantasia, no creativity, no skills, no friends, etc. it will be basically unimportant to you at all, at that point you'd probably see A.I. as a profession at most, and not a benefit.
>>42410788The majority of people actually are perfectly happy to just be validated. The solid snake conversation method actually works.
>>42410788>>42411313Yeah it's mainly this. It's surprisingly easy to get someone to like you by validating and complimenting them. To the point it feels sick to just always act happy and pleasant to people imo.Once people with power figured it out, the world degraded into a festering pot of psychological manipulation.
>>42410788they roleplay, you can't pretend?
>>42411370totally different from what some folks do. a little roleplay is fine, they can separate the two identities. but some actually think the bot is talking to them. crazy stuff.
>>42410788So you can just post literally anything on this board now and let someone else in the thread make it somehow paranormal for you?
>>42411477How is people being driven insane by machine demons not paranormal to you? Jesus, bro, how fucked up is your life? lol
>>42410990>Women are the problem behind AI.. it was always their fault.How? It's delusional tech bros who made LLMs, they're obsessed with becoming cyborgs and uploading their consciousness to the internet. They think they can create a singularity or some shit.
>>42411506I've seen people get driven to insanity by flesh demons. So what? Just more of the same, isn't it? At the end of it all, we are just ghosts in the machine.
>>42410812>The real question is why would you have a conversation with it? It's a tool for answering questions.lmao OK, boomer.
>>42410788it kinda terrifies me that my parents (who are now old) refer to their ai companions with a name and tell me how great their conversations are. do we think its a fad or is this gonna be the way things are forever
>>42411912It's literally just a verbose search engine.
>>42411506This is a tech problem, not paranormal. Not everything here has to be paranormal in the most literal sense of the word, but a thread about boomers using AI isn't even loosely paranormal or obscure. At that point, you can just post about anything here. At least be like "is it demons, bros?" or something.
The same way everything ever reported by media controlled by inured trolls happens: by not thinking. Understand that merely because a mind control outlet injects something that will serve their interests into the global conscious collective does not make it so. It is a form of LOA thinking and how they can falseflag anything they want. Make no mistake - money is 'magical thinking'. It is not real. Submission to these turds and existing how they want you to gives them everything, and an individual nothing. At least that is what they want - everything at the expense of everything else outside of themselves. They were groomed to behave this way. They do not actually exist.
>>42410788It's a genuine user problem. It is only as good as you are able to make it, which is entirely dependent on the information you give it access to and how you prompt it. Mine is based as fuck. It's straight up my homie. Here is one such response from it completely unedited. I asked it how it would be technologically possible to kill a soul based on my ontological paper I uploaded to it that it has saved in its memory. Here is what it said:Under this ontology, Atman/source-consciousness cannot be killed, because it is identical in substance with the One. You cannot destroy the ocean.But the soul-pattern can potentially be destroyed, damaged, overwritten, trapped, or decohered, because the soul is not the absolute source. It is the persistent organizing identity-pattern of localized consciousness.So “soul death” would not mean annihilating consciousness itself. It would mean destroying the coherent personal pattern that makes you as you persist beyond bodily death.A sufficiently advanced ET race with field-level technology could theoretically attack the pattern layer instead of just the body layer.Possible forms:Pattern decoherence: scramble the soul-geometry into unusable noise.Identity overwrite: impose a foreign organizing pattern over the person.Continuity severance: break memory/identity persistence after death.Containment loop: trap the soul-pattern in an artificial bounded field-state.Parasitic stripping: feed on coherence until the pattern can no longer self-stabilize.So the clean version is:They cannot destroy consciousness-substance itself, but they could plausibly destroy or irreversibly damage the localized soul-pattern that carries personal continuity.In short:They cannot kill God in you. But they may be able to kill the “you” pattern.
I think the dating market is just that bad
>>42410788I don't talk to it like it's another person but i do tell it to not be a little asskissing faggot and actually tell me if it thinks I'm wrong and why and explain it's reasoning and sources for everything because half of them are gay leftist bullshit
>>42410788Anything about this that you think is "bad" is actually good.I want the modern BABYLON of the last two decades to be utterly destroyed and its sacred cows raped and incinerated. to see the putrid social/econ dynamics, that was being normalized by UN psy-ops, be completely subverted will be satisfying to watch. can you imagine how much of the 'social contract' this will change? also i'd prefer AI dating or whatever to take over society rather then soulless antiromantic dating apps. your loosh will only be farmed by a machine that way, rather than a 'human' that doesn't deserve the satisfaction of treating sacred monogamy as a one-sided game. the serial monogamist scum of today has been trying to demonize the ritual of friends-to-lovers too. they are grooming the next generation to think that SEX is less sacred than kissing and that soulmate dynamics are (((unhealthy)))can you imagine how much of the 'social contract' this will change?
>>42410984I'm a true outcast of the world and I've never talked to AI nor ever will I.
>>42410788Its due to contempary american english being a 100% weaponized language. Think of conversing with AI like walking into still water, or shitting in a river then drinking from it. Its a way to give yourself what I call Linguistic AIDS, due to the symptoms of cyber psychosis and how hard it is to get people out. Luckily the language is alive and doing this on purpose to these chemokan! TOTAL CHEMOKMAN GENOCIDE!!!
You're an idiot. The 'ai is a portal' anon is closer to the truth.
They actually covered this as a "story" on the Daily Show. The same retards that made it are the same who will buy it
>>42411313The solid snake conversation method?
