Is it truly a sacrifice if you lose nothing? If J man really is god, and he is eternal, is his mortal death more or less not any actual sacrifice? Not to refer to television as some kind of well of factual information but in the Kngiht of the Seven Kingdoms show, there's a line that the Baratheon guy says about "The gods hate a fraud" about the King dying because he joined a battle in which the opponents were sworn to defend him, so he risked nothing, and so the gods punished this by making his brother land a killing blow by mistake.It got me thinking about Christ, if we take it at face value, then he risks nothing, he is not dying if he will resurrect in 3 days later and then ascends to heaven, he is not dying if he is eternal, he sacrificed nothing except 33 years, which would be a blink of an eye for an eternal being, a blip on the cosmic timeline.I've always entertained the idea that Jesus was instead on of yahweh's sons so to speak, I propose that the archangels are essentially like children to him and that Jesus was probably Michael. So Michael, being the "son of god" goes down at the command of yahweh, but unbeknownst to him Michael is actually a sacrifice, he doesn't get resurrected (otherwise why does he only stick around 3 days supposedly?) I'd say Angels exist on a higher dimension, as well as yhahweh and so they simply removed his body from the 3rd dimension, and so it appears as if he vanished from the tomb, maybe another archangel stepped in so others could see him "ascend to heaven"But ultimately it's either yahweh sacrificed nothing, or he sacrificed one of the angels he cared about most. Lucifer was said to be his "favored angel" before the fall, after the fall he did some fuckery to "lock" yahweh from harvesting human souls until the sacrifice of another son undid the fuckery.
It's an emotional scamThe jews love pulling this grift every era>you have a flaw/you have original sin/you are anti-semetic>jews are more moral/jesus is most moral>that's why you need to obey and be slaves to jews
... Judas was Michael.
>>42421261I agree and see it inherently as a slave religionWhich is why>anyone is redeemable>"rewarded" by faith and not deeds>ask for forgiveness and not strength to be betterI've been preached at by all sorts of degens that I'd hate to be lumped in with and judged as "equals". I can see why it's appealing ot the absolute dregs of society but it's appalling to me.Anyways my ultimate thought is that by "accepting him as lord" you literally enslave your immortal soul to him for eternity and that "heaven" is actually a sort of hell.
>Let the “Angel Gabriel,” the “Lord” of Iran, watch over his people; and Michael-Jehovah, over his Hebrews. These are not the gods of other nations, nor were they ever those of Jesus.
>>42421308okay so who is jesus
>>42421372>who is jesusGod
>>42421229Christ's sacrifice on the cross was not about Him losing anything, let alone for His own sake, it was about His sinless blood being shed on the cross as the perfect and final atonement for our sins.
>>42421229Sacrifices are black magic.Sacrifices are black magic!Sacrifices are black magic!!!Now you know.
