inb4 nonstop fillion spam like every other good thread on the board
>>3067317why did he bleach zevran's skin
>>3067276Source please.
>>3067412It’s just screenshots from BG3. With a few mods installed.https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/899https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/12233https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/12315https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/7296https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/11675
Do you think the sex scenes in Veilguard will be "explicit" as the ones in BG3? I kind of like Emmrich and Lucanis so I would not mind steamy scenes with them(especially if they turn out to be hungry bottoms)
>>3067482I would hope. But I definitely doubt it especially after what we saw out of Andromeda and the treatment we got for m/m romance. The options were slim and both of their scenes were fade to black. Though they did restore Jaal’s romance with Scott. And that was fairly explicit. Nowhere near as Cora’s scene however.
>>3067482Doubt it. Everything about that game looks so watered down already.And desu, I don't really care either way. None of the veilguard guys are even remotely fuckable, so I'll pass on any romance this time around.That is, if I even bother getting this game... Also, isn't it weird how we've had 4 games so far, and yet none have given us gay guys our own conventionally handsome, dorky, sweet, actually romantic, knight in shining armor chantry boy?Women already had Alistair, Sebastian (even if he's just barely there) and Cullen. When tf are we getting our own? I'm sick of only ever getting morally dubious, promiscuous, unattractive outcasts, who may or may not be riddled with stereotypes.
>>3067735Why the fuck did it change "desu" to desu? Fucking weeb speak.
>>3067736"T B H". NOT "DESU".Wtf is going on?
>>3067737Oh... Word filters are a thing here. Yay...Τbн
>>3067736>>3067737>>3067738post porn you sperg
>>3067735>isn't it weird how we've had 4 games so far, and yet none have given us gay guys our own conventionally handsome, dorky, sweet, actually romantic, knight in shining armor chantry boy?That's the real shame of it. We are always stuck with the morally dubious companion as a love interest. Nothing that fits the ideal which you've described. >When tf are we getting our own? I'm sick of only ever getting morally dubious, promiscuous, unattractive outcasts, who may or may not be riddled with stereotypes.Perhaps never from Bioware. They missed out on Alistair for Dragon Age. And Garrus from Mass Effect. The closest you'll ever get that doesn't embody those traits is Gale from Baldur's Gate 3. Sure he's a wizard but he has the same charm as Alistair and is quite handsome.
>>3067751Yeah, at least Larian gave us Gale.I was surprised by just how much I ended up liking him, even if he may not be a rugged warrior like Alistair and Cullen.Hot, nerdy magic man won me over lol.I'll gladly take him over Dorian, Zevran, and the Veilguard dudes any day.Now don't get me wrong, I still think those guys are good characters. In fact, Dorian is easily one of my favorite companions. I'm just not attracted to any of them, neither in looks nor personality. And it doesn't help that none of those guys are very romantic, and that they all embody certain negative stereotypes and tropes that I'm really tired of seeing in m/m romance.And the only thing I'm genuinely ticked off about is that those are our only options, as far as papa Bioware is concerned. We're only ever allowed to have outcast angst, morally gray spies with a fucked up past, and catty, flamboyant queens...
>>3067753>Yeah, at least Larian gave us Gale.And am I ever thankful for that. I feel like had they not made all the romanceable companions bisexual. All whom would have been avaliable as a m/m romance would've been Astarion. At least that wasn't the case.>And it doesn't help that none of those guys are very romantic, and that they all embody certain negative stereotypes and tropes that I'm really tired of seeing in m/m romance.The feeling is mutual. Good to hear somebody has a likeminded viewpoint. It boggles me as to why these writers tend to delve into those tropes when developing said character. I don't mean to whine but there's definitely room out there to go outside the box. No need to write the same thing over and over.>I'm genuinely ticked off about is that those are our only options, as far as papa Bioware is concerned. We're only ever allowed to have outcast angst, morally gray spies with a fucked up past, and catty, flamboyant queens...I don't like it either. What's the strangest about it is how they keep patting themselves on the back about how these guys bring something new to the table. Or are an inversion of certain characters/archetypes. When it's nothing further from the truth. Hopefully something decent comes from them but I doubt it. I definitely do hope Larian's next project delivers once more. It would suck if BG3 and what it had to offer was just a one time deal.
Cute average penises ITT
>>3067808yea :)one of the few threads with good, female-made art
>>3067900
>>3067482Late reply but as I figured. There's no explicit sex scenes. The only ones you get are from Davrin and Taash. Everyone else is a fade to black. What's worse is that the romance subplots overall pretty barebones, especially from a Bioware game. Specifically Lucanis, which is a shame cause he was the only one I was somewhat interested in.
>>3069798why
its sext
>>3070048Kys retard, stop spamming that fillion crap where it doesn't belong. At least make your own thread.
Lucanis and Viago sex scene whenshit throw Illario in there too, who gaf
>>3070530>Lucanis and Viago sex scene whenHate to break it to you but probably never. There aren't any sex scenes as is in the game. With the exception being Taash.
>>3070577Oh I know, I wasn't being serious but one can dream lol. That one companion banter that implies Lucanis had the hots for Viago at one point made my mind race
>>3070583My bad but you do have a point about the potential of Viago's and Lucanis' pairing.
>>3067914>Two guys kissingNot certain if AI ART IMG2ING stuff is allowed, but after a few hundred gens and prompt tweaking, here's a photo reinterpreting of that image. It lacks the intimacy factor on the faces though.
>>3070771Believe it or not that isn’t an AI artwork. It was made back around 2014. That artist had more explicit pieces but they seemed to have fallen off the face of the earth.
