The new /sci/ wikihttps://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki(More resources in replies)
To use MathJaX, put your TeX code between [ math ] ... [ /math ] tags for inline equations or [ eqn ] ... [ /eqn ] tags for block equations.[eqn]\zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^s} = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^{s - 1}}{e^x - 1} \mathrm dx[/eqn]Note: You may preview the output by clicking the TeX button at the top left corner in the quick reply window.Additional supported file type on /sci/ is PDF.Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to >>>/adv/ - Advice.If you want help with your homework, go to >>>/wsr/ - Worksafe Requests.
So if Jesus turned a cup of water into wine, how much energy would be released to fuse the correct amount of hydrogen and oxygen into wine components? Wouldn't the radiation and heat cause a minor catastrophe?
>>16810694Himself, you still don't get it, at this point your IQ is probably too low to comprehend God and that's fine go be an atheist or whatever, it doesn't matter you're just one of the countless brainlets in the simulation anyway.
>>16810700 Who allowed god to be himself and you to be mentally retarded?
>>16810700Humans are completely incomprehensible to most animals and the difference between us and them is infinitely smaller than between a human and a theoretical God, we must be extremely wrong in our understanding of this subject. You can even trace the origins of modern religions historically and often end up at very mundane explanations/origins and massive inconsistencies in their temporal narratives.
>>16806504None. Energy and matter are purely within the realm of the material. God exists above that. One instant, it was water, the next, wine was in its place.
>>16810753Just like your brain. One instant it's there and the next instant there's nothing.
Seriously, how low your IQ and how rotten your brain needs to be believe in this kind of shit? >'all things are exclusively physical including your mind' >easily refuted by pointing out that the proposition itself expresses linguistic meaning, which itself is not derived from physical propertiesThe fact that today most of the scientists advocate for this 'doctrine' really explains why there is an ongoing stagnation in science for decades
>>16810629Truly entombed in physicalism you are if you think an immaterial substance can have a location. Sad!
>>16810637what's that, no empirical proof? tough. whenever you post empirical proof I'll think about engaging, until then, I sleep
>>16810629>>16810646>the e-wordyou committed le heckin scientism! back to philosophy jail with you!
>>16810646Plenty of literature on veridical NDEs involving objective observations of the external world from the unconscious, not gonna spoonfeed you though you'll find out when you die
>>16810646>>16810629>can you show me the proof showing how brain causes consciousness and how both are identical with each other>eh...uh.. actually science still is not advanced enough...to prove it..>then why do you require exclusively for non-physical entity to be physically localized in the brain ?>....physicalists are so fvcking ridiculous it's over
>It's paradoxical and yet, it worksWhy is he explaining particle-wave duality to a grad student? Wouldn't he already know ts?
Griffiths wasn’t written yet.
Famed primate scientist Jane Goodall has diedRIP
>>16810495this and a crawling female is a scandalous neuron activating display
>>16803143>the queen of atheism has diedgood
>>16810712Lol retard. If anything, she's the queen of anti-atheism.>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Goodall#Religion_and_spiritualityWorst you can say about her is that she was an elderly Trump derangement victim who never figured out how to use the internet to find the full transcript of a cable TV news hoax. Can't blame an 80 year old for that.
>>16804190>>thread starts screeching about immigrants and brown people4chan is like that so no surprises here?
>>16810728It's notably less screechy since X relieved some of the internet pressure by unquarantining our race hobbyists and allowing them to poop in a bigger pool.
is anyone here an actual scientist or is everyone just larping ?
>>16809028I am just a tech. I do get to play with cool equipment every day though, so that makes me happy.
>>16809028I've been a chemist, a biochemist and a computational biologist. Science is a scam, I'm firmly moving over to tech.Leave science to the independently wealthy who don't need to actually earn a decent income, like it has historically been.
>>16809146>maybe next year they'll offer me assistant!
>>16810290I correct it in the proofing process
sabine probably browses here
I ate frozen tendies for about a week straight and I stopped feeling as good from fapping and orgasm felt like nothing. Erection was the same but I could barely feel anything while doing it. It's processed frozen foods in general that do this but what's the actual science behind why it reduces sexual pleasure? Does it have to do something with hijacking the reward system or is it something related to the body.tldr; eating frozen food made fapping and cooming less pleasurable without affecting erection strength
>>16806692unless you actually keep a log of what time and how intense each orgasm was, no they very much likely have not stayed the same>>16808586>I'm uncut so it always feels goodlmao everyone on this board is retarded I fucking swear>>16808005bro is zardoz posting
>>16807588Dumb fuck he changed 1 variable you can intuitively say it’s the tendies you must be some retarded atheist too lmao
>>16807637I get hard af after eating lamb
It's been a few days since i made the thread and it's felt so much better. I also noticed that cums feel worse on the days where I have to wear sunscreen.
>>16810184Maybe seed oils and sunscreen lower test
The eternal debate...
>>16810236What they fail to understand is this is a question of design, not physics. Even if the naive case were to produce so-called relative motions, the development would directly lead to pseudo-surfaces: an implied, unshown green portal serving to remove the undesirable characteristic through some holographic cavity.
>>16810236the only reason why this debate is eternal is because you keep reposting it
>>16810320thisautosage
>>16810236Portals are just wormholes, there is no length of space between the yellow portal and blue portal. take the window/door analogy, if the window/door was approaching you, you don't get yeeted outwards. The only effect of the speed at which the portal is moving is how fast you materialize on the other end. The obvious answer is A./thread
>>16810236A. Alway has been.
How long until full remote energy transmission over super long distances?
>>16810293Learn to hibernate
>>16810264-141 years
>>16810265>depends on how motivated society isretard. we all know too goddamn well who exactly needs to be motivated by what and it's not fucking "society"
>>16810267It's 2025 anon can we play stop with the charades
10 minutes after we reanimate Nikola Tesla.Captcha:2XDNA
whatya think?
>can't be observed or measured>can't be disproved by any experiment>dogmatic in nature>it just works, so don't ask questionsSeems pretty anti-scientific to me. Why are people so close minded to alternatives?
>>16810691>The bottom and right* ones are panels are simulated data
>>16810691Another cornerstone of cosmology:>The fluctuations of the Cosmic Microwave BackgroundThe CMB was emitted in the early universe, it is a fossil record of the fluctuations of the universe at that early epoch. It shows the fluctuations were much smaller back then. Before these fluctuations had even been observed theorists had calculated them in detail. Hot big bang cosmology predicted that there would be acoustic modes in the fluctuations, which were the imprint of sound waves in the primordial plasma. A nice feature is that dark matter and normal baryonic matter behave differently back then, as dark matter has no pressure. The result is that Cold Dark Matter cosmologies predict a very different distribution than cosmologies with only normal matter. MOND proponents proposed this as a test of their cosmology. The result was that the observations closely matched the predictions of Cold Dark Matter, eventually ruling out baryon only cosmology. Again QI offers nothing. Mike claims QI could help the low power below l of about 10. But he ignores that his model doesn't include CDM, and would fuck the rest of the powerspectrum. But of course he waves his hands. QI is not a serious dark matter alternative.
>>16810704Pic related is what happens if you remove dark matter from these models. It fails to match reality. The only way alternative models have manged to fit this is by adding complex additional fields to their cosmology, which behave like matter. At which point you're trading invisible matter-like fields for invisible matter. And remember that Cold Dark Matter hasn't been forced to fit the data like these proposals, it predicted observations.
>>16810214But that has always been like that, right?
>>16810707>Cosmology and the expanding universeFundamental to being able to make any calculations in the universe is having a cosmological model. This describes the geometry and evolution of the universe. In standard cosmology dark matter isn't just sprinkled where it is needed, it self consistently added into the model of how the universe expands. If you change that model, you change everything. But without that you cannot really interpret anything.QI has no self consistent cosmology. It also has fundamental self-contradictions. For example a key parameter in QI is the radius of the observable universe. Mike assumes the standard value. But that isn't a measurement, it is a calculation from a model. And the model which was used to calculate it was Lambda Cold Dark Matter. It makes absolutely no sense. If you remove DM the radius will drastically change. Another piece of evidence that it's more numerology than physics.
Very Large Telescope just gave another big destructive hit to standard science...3I/ATLAS is bleeding nickel at levels no comet should, defying physics, and dwarfing anything we’ve seen before, including Oumuamua and Borisov.>https://x.com/UAPWatchers/status/1973358078935581126
>>16804296>why are we still posting this hack?hack board
We are still waiting for HiRISE images. Hack redemption arc.
Schmauss is continuing to holocaust Avi the ack.
hey wait a minute
>ayys thought mars was the inhabited planetlmao gottem
horse anatomy while horse wearing jeans editionno giving/asking for medical advice or psyche patients
Where’s the /med/cord link aaaaaaa I need to talk to medfags who are just as fucked up as I am I’m tired of pretending I’m normal all the time
>>16810156Admins covertly create these as honeypots to sniff out the medtards and dismiss them right before graduation
>>16810158I graduated already :(
>>16790504>>16790504Anyone fellow Histologist/Lab techs here?
>>16807476>best placeThat's the gaming chair on my anesthesia machine. Stop saying nonsense.
I have no desire to do anything. I sit around all day, don’t feel motivated to form relationships, and feel like I’m wasting my life. I’m thinking about giving it a shot. I'm getting quoted $500 a session for 2 sessions a week for 3-5 weeks and want to see if it's really worth it.
>>16809761>meds are le bad cause doctors are le ebilschizo babble
>>16809847>nigger can't readmany such cases
>>16809747You've got this backwards
>>16808947i think americans behave like this because American insurance will cover the emergency treatment but won't cover otc medication
>>16810596honestly pharma jews are based as fuck, amerigolems deserve what they're getting
Who was the asshole who decided home labs shouldn't exist? why do I got to pay fucking 50 dollars + shipping for each dead mouse I want to use for study? I can just go outside and get like 10 dead mice for free.
>>16810035Who the fuck needs 100 mice?
>>16810038Who the fuck needs exactly one!?!"Man, I only had one dead, preserved mouse." said no one ever.
>>16810040"Man, if I ..."
>>16809235Lab rats are usually bred to a particular strain for experimental consistency. You can otherwise buy rats for cheap though? Look at animal feed shops for pythons and snakes
>>16809996>putting aside your lack of understanding of marginal costSo what? Let's say the market price is $25. That's it. There's no transfer agreement requirement. Do you value the time it takes you to catch, kill, and preserve a mouse at more than that or less than that?>moreBuy the mouse>lessGo do it yourself>but I want to bitch like a petulant dimwit raised with no fatherFuck off!
