[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/3/ - 3DCG

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Dear Blender users and devs,

Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces with supporting edge loops is not a alternative to chamfered edges. Not all smooth corners are the same. You "bevel" tool shits the bed on just about anything more complicated than your default cube. Your Booleans only work 70% of the time at best, even for simple object. This is not a way to live, and you should feel shameful.
>>
* cums on your face *
>>
>>1002517
ok. take a look at the source and see if you can make it work like you want. good luck and thank you for your contribution, anon
>>
>>1002517
> Your Booleans only work 70% of the time at best, even for simple object.
True
>>
sounds like a skill issue
>>
>>1002580
Also true, for example booleans sometimes don't work because of wrong normal directions or holes in geometry. Not so often applicable but when there is a lot going on in the extruded mesh, try generating convex hull and boolean that instead. Or sometimes it makes sense to separate parts of the mesh and convex hull them individually, when global convex hull is not applicable.
>>
>>1002517
>Your Booleans only work 70% of the time at best, even for simple object.
its always cracks me up zbrush booleans are perfect since they a just a visual trick, yet when you accept and they get calculated they work well
i blender im afraid to press button so it dosnt crash
>>
>>1002517
>Your Booleans only work 70% of the time at best
that being generous, you have that boomer Howard_Trickey working on it so we will have to wait at least till 2026, any shit more advanced like soft booleans like Houdini does is out of the scope.
https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/120182
>>
>>1002565
This but unironically.
>>
>>1002605
I mean, at least someone is working on it, most of that CompSci shit flies over my head
>>
>>1002771
>at least someone is working on it
He just worte the design he is not even working on the Boolean Fast Mode Refactor, it is done by a guy with leukemia, Germano Cavalcante, so we maybe don't get that neither.
https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/106631
>>
>>1002517
>>1002589
Werks 4 me. Keep your closed-source kikeware to yourself thank you very much.
>>
>>1002565
anyone with the skill to fix blender's many problems doubtless has an income high enough that they can just use professional tools rather than waste their life on hobbyware
>>
>>1002773
I hope things get better. I've been using blender for 3 years and every year things are getting better.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.