Ok, /3/. What do I do next?
I will try tomorrow. I do not really remember any Blender controls. Can someone explain Chris meme to me? I want to be a part of /3/ wonderful community...
>>977059>>977081If I use these settings like in the pixel, will blensere generate your image?
>>977086*picrel*blender
>alright i set uo my image planes....ill oick it back up tomorrowAnd then he never did.Blocking out a figure takes less time than it took you to find your porn folder in the image selection window.
>>977059I might give you advice, but you have to promise me that you will stop being a pedophile.
>>977086jesse
Why model a pre-puberty child tho?
>>977059burn all your electronics, then find jesus or whatever
>>977081get the overall proportion first with simple geometrythen you go rounding the shape in the process
>>977059Very erotic loli.>>977081A notorious schizo. Do not engage. Also his name is Cris.
Here is my first model I have done some time ago. It was super easy having all the limbs separated and does not look that bad for game prototype purposes. I want to do Tabako-san properly. What is the common approach to the limbs? Are they created separately and then joined to torso, or are they done like I am doing on the right? Joining two objects with vertices seems rather difficult. I guess it does not matter when you are sculpting, and then do retopology, because the result will be a single mesh?Maybe I should have just added cylinders for each part and try to connect them... or just fuck off and watch a tutorial.>>977086Anon.. what?>>977091It was midnight! And I've got distracted by my friend's anime stream. I am back and will try to make something out of her.>>977106I envisioned a game set in rural Europe about infertile race of hebe witches. The goal is to make them fertile, hehe.>>977108No can do.. wish that was not the case, sincerely.>>977115Thank you!>>977130She is super cute, the source is Madogiwa no Tabako-san.
>>977150Awful, you are clueless
>>977152That's absolutely true, lol. What standard should I hold myself up to as a literal first timer?
>>977153By getting rid of blender has its the worst 3D software in existence. If you’re going to learn how to make bodies at least sculpt it first. You learn more from sculpting than building the body by blocks.
>>977154You are right, downloading Blockbench this instant.
>>977159Jesus you are such an insecure fag, ngmi
>>977160Sorry, maybe this is more your speed.You are right, downloading Blockbench this instant. /s
>>977161Retard
>>977059Tabaco uoohh
OP here.. I tried and failed. Did not do anything I liked. I will try following a proper tutorial first.https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvgIVNDU-Dxi5h3JLNJMfK0t3-WsBm6Av
>>977152>>977154>>977160>>977160>>977164Why do you insist on trying to make sure this board stays dead? What's in it for you?
>>977201Oh no! I was slightly mean to a pedo with no eye for forms that will clearly never make it, golly gosh i killed this board :(((
>>977227Except for every other thread you ruin. Forgot to include those :^)Nice strawman though!!!!
>>977228Oh my bad I didn't realise you were a schizo
>>977198Keep it up, you'll get the hang of it
>>977115That method would be in any way useful only if you're using that as a basis for sculpting. It would not be easy to convert what you cdreated into useful topology. >>977150Most people model limbs separately. You can connect them together by remeshing it, or you can just cut holes into them and connect them vertex by vertex. E.g., cull the leg a little bit to get a round faceless boundary, and then cut a hole into the torso so that it has a boundary with equally many vertices as the boundary of the leg. Then just connect the edge loops.>>977227I agree with the other anon. You should definitely just shut up.
>>977232shut up if you dont dont know box modeling.guilty gear models was done this way.
>>977236Box modelling is fine, when you know what you're doing. You do not. Your topology is useless.
>>977239you dont know box modeling shut up.
>>977240here is my loli im working on i started just like thati will do the fingers and toes next
>>977236>guilty gear models was done this way.Why do retards like you always bring up GG like it was some group effort and crowning 3d achievement that you took part in? It's like trannies and autists "claiming" famous people just because they show a single quirk that's commonly associated with their disabilities.What one studio/person does doesn't give you credibility, it gives THEM credibility. Just because something works for them and their workflow that they developed for their project, doesn't mean it's applicable to all projects.
>>977247>It's like trannies and autistsironic too, considering that's the majority of guilty gears playerbase
>>977247box modeling is not a guilty gear thing, you imbecile
>>977256>box modeling is not a guilty gear thing, you imbecileTell that to this guy >>977236
>>977150Thank you
>>977243show wires so i can steal it
>>977243Why does it look like you stolen a model and assumed we wouldn’t know. It doesn’t match with your current knowledge of how you modeled your characters.
>>977150I'm a fan of box modelling. when you box model, you can begin very simply like this anon does: >>977115 It might not seem right to actually go with boxes at first, they're so rigid and angular. But think about it... what is a cylinder but a subdivided box?(pic related)As long as your basic boxes are connected properly, then you can just subdivide to add more geometry. Using the subdivide modifier, you can see what your model looks like subdivided, without harming the basic boxes you constructed.But it's likely that you want more control over the shape of you model than mere boxes. Well that's easy to do. Just add "loopcuts". While in edit mode, press Ctrl+R, and hover over the geometry you want to "cut".(they call it cutting, but it's actually dividing faces in half.) The loop cut tool will automatically calculate a route through the faces of your geometry. It knows where to go, because the faces are all cleanly aligned, unless you fucked up somehow.The example this anon gave >>977115 is pretty good. But there are a number of decisions they made that would create trouble with loop cuts.But in any case, with box modelling, you can connect simple shapes at the joints to make sure they're all connected properly, and then add as many loop cuts as you think is necessary to round the figure out. Because the boxes were all connected cleanly, the loopcuts will be clean too.It will take some exercise to get used to the process. But once you get it, box modelling is pretty easy, and gives you a ton of control. It boils down to just laying out connecting zones, and then bridging edges in between.
>>977335Thanks for taking time to post this, very much appreciated!
Keep it up anon, the market for sexy little girls/teenage is there if you're into it.You're better than me for already starting...
>>977059
>>977390>Making something this cute without anatomy knowledgeh-hey, you're not allowed to do that
>>977419I'm usually pretty easily impressed by 3d models but this doesn't look very good imo
>>977424Isn't this what op asked for? What else do you want.
>>977441Okay I admit that looks pretty great.
>>977419>>977441ah that technique for making hands isn't good, and you can see in the final mesh the hands still have the boxiness of the original...boxes.It's better to make all the parts of the hand, position them correctly, and then connect them. The curve of the palm will emerge automatically.Trying to extrude out hands from the wrists always sounds like a good idea but you can never get rid of that box shape, and everyone in the world is a veritable expert in what hands look like.
>>977239
>>977419>>977441is that the same model? Doesnt look like it desu
>>977419>>977485Now i see your mistakes, because you never care enough about wiring, the model itself becomes useless when moving around. You just created a poster.
>>977525Yeah the primary advantage of box modelling over sculpting is laying the ground work for good topo from the beginning. If you don't mind retopo, or even "like" to do it, though. Then w/e. You're just doing more work to give yourself more work.
>>977556All you did was put the ingredients into the bowl and bake the cake without structuring into a circle bowl. That’s what you did. We build sound wiring so nothing bad happens during animation takes. The human body isn’t built like that at all, there’s clear signs it will deformed into a mess.This whole “It takes a lit longer” sounds like Bullshit talk from amateur CGI blender artist. They don’t have experience or knowledge, what’s a house if you build it entirely of triangles, a very angry customer.
>>977574I'm not the OP and you may have noticed that my use of the word "yeah" was me agreeing with you.
