take pictures with your iphone
>>978713One option is AI of course. Although I just asked for brick building texture it snuck a screamer in there.https://dezgo.com/txt2img
>>978722Looks like shit. And this is coming from someone who actually "likes" AI for certain tasks.AI has a use, but I don't think it's a good replacement for photo textures. The benefit of photo textures is that it actually exists, it's a real tangible place that you're sourcing it from. Not in any kind of retarded "SOVL" way, but like a place and object that has realistic wear and stuff because it's a real place/object that people have interacted with. I think that AI can definitely approximate that sort of thing, but I don't think it's particularly good at really nailing down that "lived-in" kind of look that photo textures have.It's really fucking hard to say what I mean without it coming off as philosophical bullshit, but that's definitely not what I'm trying to get at. Hopefully you do pick up what I'm tryna put down, my brotha.
>>978713they may of removed free credits but you still CAN grab images (albeit the base resolution) from the page. I just tried it out, I use a chrome extension to list every image on a page and then extracted that image automatically. Turned out to be HIGHER resolution than the lowest resolution you can go, so dont know how the 'hover to expand' system works, but I get a better image than if you were to buy and download...
>>978734that actually sounds really handydo you mind sharing what extension you used?
>>978713for environment? unironically google maps street view. yeah the quality aint exactly HD but at least its 360 degrees and you have multiple point of view for reference. it is as "real life" environment as its gets. perhaps you can cleanup and upscale with AI and even take a few shots and do photogrammetry
>>978740Sorry I didn't get notification for some reason. The chrome extention seems to be removed from the store, but I looked up some alternatives:Display Image List:https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/display-image-list/mjanofnaeoiipkoeajefmfpgcnlgiflc Seems good
AI
>>980424Not an answer and that looks like shit.
>>980424That's not a texture that's just a shitty photo
>>983931>anon learns what the "photo" in "photo texture" means.It's a shitty AI image, so it's unusable as it is, but still. Photo textures generally are just photos of things that you grab details and textures from (like as in the actual meaning of "texture", not in the 3d sense). Generally they're not ready to use seamless textures for materials. They still have their place though.
>>978713Have you ever tried Google Maps? It’s free, and you can take unlimited screenshots.
>hi guys I need a source for free textur->AI>hi guys can you help me with this retopo probl->AI>hi guys I need a girlfr->AIIs this board full of bots now or what
>>987253I actually do this from time to time. It's hit or miss. Resolution can either be okay, or complete shit.I'll take a "stroll" in downtown NYC, or some 3rd world country and just pick up textures.
>>987293You can use Google Maps and then recreate the textures in Blender or Substance Designer. It’s better than using 160p images as textures.
>>987421That defeats the entire point. I might as well just skip the middleman and just make them in SP without ever going into Google Earth. Doesn't suddenly make them photo textures though.
>>978722AI slop spits mostly low quality textures tho
>>979887>No I won't give you my extension here's a lower version of it. You guys are all too tiresome my god.
>>980424What site is this
>>987626how do I give something that has been discontinued from the store? The other extension I recommended does the same thing you troglodyte.
>>987433Just model the walls you need and texture it.
>>987749Do you actually know how to use photo textures dude?