rate my rockbruches (mudbox)
man it's sad they stopped updating mudbox. i knew it was truly over when i watched some autodesk livestream about maya and the guy was using zbrush to sculpt details.
>>985667are these for zbrush?
Why are you still using chudbox?
>>986610best software used to create cgi was from 2006-2013
>>986674everything else is just technical bullshit that saves the artist 2 steps but cost thousands of dollars if you wanna upgrade your software
>>985675I still have my old brush licence, and it works perfectly fine for sculpting.Why do you need the new features?Same thing with mudbox, still ompletely usable.
>>986693Mudbox sucks, it can't even do symmetry properly there's always some isolated vertice it misses when sculpting over edges. Pirate Zbrush and save time
>>987274>Mudbox sucksnahalso, vector brushes makes everything easier if you know how to make them workspent 5 minutes using the same vector brush btw
>>987294zero sculpting all vector brush
>>987294it's a dead abandoned software. it was good in the 2000s, but today it's not. it lacks more than half the features zbrush has which make your work easier to produce.
>>987299>it's a dead abandoned softwarenahit was actually used to create thanos and other various cgi elements for marvel films
>>987294I'm missing hard edges vs soft edges and definition in your models
God I wish Mudbox shipped with PBR shaders
>>987301it was done in 5 minutes>>987300proofhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nmz2VmPMgRIits not about the software, its about the artist
>>987301is this what youre looking forsomething HEAVILY edited to the point where it looks fake aka stylizedyeah, i can do that as well
>>986693>new featuresyou can create hard surface easily in zbrush, has a gorillion brushes, shaders, tools and options. you do not need to software hop anymore just to create an armor plate for a character. it's like using a bicycle versus a motorbike.
