What went wrong?
looks good to me, or did you want to look at smeary normal maps for the rest of your life?
>>997995>What went wrong?Probably fake, like that starfield sandwich
>>997998Nvm, didn't see the "topology after nanite" bit at the bottom, perfectly normal in this case
>converting models from an engine that works in a completely different way to standard 3d software>"wHy dOeS tHe tOpOlOgY lOoK sO sTrAnGe :OO
>>997995nanite really is black magic
>>997999>>998004I think the use of Nanite in this image is just a joke - like a meme reference. No matter how you put it though it would’ve been better to retopro the head
>>998005The game does not use nanite streamable.com/iz1h6d
>>998008In that case grim. But if it works it works, not like that piece needs proper topology for deformation, the performance impact should be pretty negligible, my biggest concern would be shading but it seems to be fine. It looks like the devs really wanted to show 3d details on edges such as here >>997997. Not sure how reasonable this is
>>998008>shows clip of user turning nanite offlol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M00DGjAP-mU
>>997995I wonder if OP is fake like the Starfield Sandwich. Remember the faked Starfield sandwich?>>997997>>998010Can't they just use a displacement map? Displacement maps actually alter the profile of the geometry. Look at the edges in pic related.
>>998014it would be a lot more expensive to do displacement to achieve the same level of detailmeshlets just werk
>>998014Displacement maps only work if it they points to displace. They don't create points from the aether
>>998014Anyone actually using true displacement maps in realtime in games? Idk why to use them instead of just baking them in 3d editor into geometry and then decimating to remove tons of unneeded geometry which exists because displacement needed cosmic subdivisions to work with. For realtime I would probably ever consider POMs, not real displacement.
>>998015>it would be a lot more expensiveNo, it wouldn't. Meshets have a ridiculously shit baseline performance and only look good when compared to rendering extremely unoptimized meshes.
>>998071>mesh shaders go brrrsorry grandpa, it's time to move on
>>998076>mesh shadersNanite doesn't even use mesh shaders by default.
>>998071not true at all, polygons are cheap nowit really is time to move on, grampa
>>998076>>998122Oh you're that troll who is too incompetent for faster boards got it
>>998122This. I work at ubisoft they just ask me to send them sculpts and they put them in game, industry standard saar!
Not sure
>>998696As I've said saar!
>>998122>Hardware improves>*Bloats software*>"waaaaaaa games are unoptimised!!1!!!!"
>>997995Why not use tessellation? I remember all the ype for it with DX11, what happened?>>998122>polygons are cheap nownot on my hard drive
>>999048>Why not use tessellationIt has to be done linearly over the geometry primitives, which means that its performance scales linearly. If you double the available hardware and double the processing speed, fragment processing becomes 2*2 times faster while vertex processing only becomes 2 times faster.
