[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/3/ - 3DCG


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: gnome6.gif (3.53 MB, 325x325)
3.53 MB
3.53 MB GIF
I have never seen a "moving painting" that is not either obvious 2D or 3D but AI seems to be able to do it. How could this be leveraged to create an entire virtual environment that looks like a painting? Can you do gif related with just the right texture on a 3D model?
>>
>>999269
>Help I'm retarded.
>>
yeah cuz it spends the time to paint every frame to that quality. when humans do that it takes years
>>
>>999269
Isn't this obvious 2d? I mean it's animated painting, which is 2d. I agree this seems like a new AI-driven genre, but quite similar stuff in other styles like Live2d was a thing for years.
>>
>>999269
>I have never seen a "moving painting" that is not either obvious 2D or 3D but AI seems to be able to do it.
you could do this in 3d if you are good enough
>>
tb h the video models make me feel very doomer about things going forward (5-10 years)
i think they'll end up replacing a ton of vfx work
>>
>>999354
most of the vfx you see today is piss poor



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.