>>282075713
Yes. I will say i had the same exact opinion. The Movie is not memorable but SAC and the two movies Innocence and Solid State Society were amazing masterpieces and proves why Mamoru Oshii is god tier in his works alongside the animation teams. It is way beyond the 1st movie in every respect.

>>282075797
Also something I forgot to add the reason why people love GITS 1995 OVA was because it was the 1st ever Animated Film to be done completely digitally. This was when Photoshop came out and helped revolutionize the industry that CG can be good and it also can be apart of a full workflow. It managed to do this 20 years before the whole industry shifted to it. Many studios either stayed full hand drawn, or went CG completely or did both.

>>282075797
Cool. I heard the recent Netflix stuff was trash so I was a bit wary about a spinoff like SAC but its decades old enough at this point to be unrelated. I'll check it out.

>>282075713
Yeah

>>282075713
Now watch the cute girls version.

>>282075797
>>282075831
Oshii did the two movies, not SAC. Also the movie is not fully digital. Only some special effects are, the rest is traditional cel animation.
>>282075713
Yes, SAC is better.

>>282076553
I do not know. With a few articles I read on GITS the 1st movie, I read that it was revolutionary for it's pioneering of digital drawings for the time it was in. It's why it's like a brilliant tech demo to show far animation had come until that point.

>>282075846
Trust me every GITS love's SAC S1-S2, Innocence and SAC those are the classics. The 1st movie just a demo do not consider it the complete experience. It's why nowadays I would recommend people watch SAC S1 then move forward than the 1st movie itself.

>>282075857
Cute Girls Version?

OVAs or the anime series?

The movie is better imo, cool ideas, poignant vibe and nice narrative. SAC is way too idea focused and I dropped it 6 episodes in

>>282076776
Filtered.

>>282077105
Yeah, filtered for actually asking for a good story and not for westoid cerebral science fiction bs

>>282075713
depends on what you liked about the film. i thought sac was pretty lackluster.

2045 is actually good

>>282077398
>Movie
>Good story
Dude 1st movie is a tech demo. If you can not see that, you are as blind as a 3rd worlder living in a cave.

File: 36e3b16f35a6b6109686ac806(...).gif (953 KB, 500x271)

953 KB GIF

>>282075713
SAC is less visually spectacular but far more rewarding narratively. I prefer it to be honest. Motoko also has a nice wry sense of humor in SAC.

>>282077562
I look for emotional impact and nothing in SAC of 6 episodes I've seen from it has satisfied me as much as the poignant scenes from the movie

>>282077610
>emotional impact
Woman detected

>>282077633
lol
seriously tho, i'd read science fiction if i was an ideas guy
and gits is one of the few anime where any anon talking about it has a higher than average chance of turning out to be a troon

>>282077610
>Emotional Impact
Wrong genre, wrong series. Go somewhere else.

File: Ghost.in.the.Shell.Stand.(...).jpg (309 KB, 1920x1040)

309 KB JPG

>is SAC worth watching?
Yes.

>>282077655
>Troon
Can not say Trans, British poster? Better be careful otherwise you will be reported for Hate Speech. :)

>>282077677
>Wrong genre
lain, texhnolyze, shinsekai yori are all among my faves
>wrong series
the movie was good at it

>>282075797
Innocence is like, half of a good movie. 1995 is way better.

>>282077707
i liked innocence's philosophy

File: JBqP1RZ1piHnYukR1jLeF6LxJ(...).jpg (46 KB, 480x360)

46 KB JPG

>>282077610
Weird. I have basically the complete opposite opinion. I'd call the movie interesting, or thought provoking. But certainly not emotionally impactful. SAC on the other hand is full of honestly tragic stuff.

>>282077772
i only watched six episodes but i did like the episode with the guy who had poor health who came back to show his metal body. if more episodes were like that i would have finished it

>>282077793
It's not every episode. But there are a lot like that.

>>282077633
>>282077677
NTA but literally every piece of media ever strives to elicit an emotional response.

I can't imagine someone watching the movies and SAC and not coming to the conclusion that Innocence is SAC but actually good.

>>282077610
>emotional impact
And you got that from the movie that doesn't have action, comedy, drama, suspense or literally anything and it's just emo characters infodumping shit? Yeah, you are retarded. The movie is the dryest shit to come out of anime.

>>282075713
SAC is very good. I like it way more than the movie, honestly.

File: p160493_p_v10_aa[1].jpg (654 KB, 1536x2048)

654 KB JPG

>>282077921
Innocence is just boring Oshii-wank - pointless philosophising, gratuitous beagle and all. Did that extended parade sequence add anything but runtime? Unless you're talking about this 2004 movie called Innocence

I like all of GITS (1995, Innocence, SAC, the rest doesn't exist), I don't understand why americans have this mentality of having to choose one and only one thing and the rest is sucks and no you can't like that only what I like.

>>282075713
>This time I want more so is SAC worth watching?
Yes. Just don't watch SAC:2045

How did you watch it?
sac is the best

>>282078198
>It added run-time
Says the Anglo who can not understand what Art is, nor can define it.

>>282078844
It's because they are lazy. Let's be honest if they were as cultured as the rest of the world they would have watched Dragon Ball, Super, the Broly movie and not just Dragon Ball Z + the older films.

>>282075713
Watch SAC and read the manga.
Volume 1+2 if you want more cop drama
Volume 3 if you want a barely comprehensible mess filled with cg straight out of the ps2 era.
(and lots of naked ladies)

>>282075713
I love the 1995 movie and started watching SAC not long ago. I was already blown away 3-4 eps in.

>>282078844
This. I honestly enjoy the movies and SAC as a whole.

>>282075713
If you want to.