>"Victim of circumstance? No, he was born evil"What was his fucking problem?
being born evil
Guy who was literally a career criminal and mugger until 2 hours ago btw
>>282190451He was correct.>>282190519That experience is what gave him the knowledge to judge the situation.
>>282190465No, that was Dio.
>>282190451Nothing, he was absolutely correct
>>282190451Dio was adopted by a rich family and he repaid them by poisoning the father because he said something that can be interpreted as saying Dio needs his charity.
Yes
>>282191364Dio was poisoning George before that.
>>282190451Dio was always going to be a asshole, because he's a undiagnosed sociopath. It just that his circumstances also influenced his decision to seek power at the cost of others. Living under a abusive father with no mother present as well as being bullied by his peers in London also played a factor towards his spiral to madness. You can tell because Dio hated his father and when he was asked to swear on his honor, he boiled up in rage claiming that his father didn't have any. He also hated that he was becoming a drunk like his father, as well. Speedwagon wasn't wrong, but he misses the whole picture.
>>282191687
>>282191687Did you know that Asians think the same way about you?
>>282192662When Dio is first adopted by the Joestars at the age of 10, he immediately formulates a plan to ruin Jonathan’s life and steal all of their money when he’s an adult. The man was always evil regardless of anything else, he’s just incidentally also prideful.
Best scene in part 1.
>>282193248They think the same of Indians.
>>282192662I agree, because Diego shows he doesn't have to be AS bad as he turned out in 1. And Diego still had some shitty circumstances.
>>282197974Diego is also an insane person who was born evil, he just didn't have the opportunities that regular Dio had to betray people. The second Diego is in a position to harm people for his own benefit, he does.
