Real talk, no Memery:Brotherhood is only more popular because it has gags and more battles, ie. it's shounen leaning.While 2003 has more adult themes and less gag humor, seinen leaning.Shounen is more popular, everyone knows that.But 2003 is objectively better.
>this shonen show is more popular when it has shonen content in it!This and more breaking news at 11
bait thread
you need to reply to yourself more
>>282293485Are you indian?
>The power of alchemy is tied to the other world, which is our world currently going through world war 2>Show ends with Ed giving up his body for AL, but Ed just ends up in WW2 Germany>Series continues in sequel movie where Ed and Al fight Germany.>Ending is Ed and Al stuck in Germany
>>282294056first post most creative post (fpmcp)>>282293485i havent seen either of these shows in a very very long time, but my main takeaway from brotherhood is the drastic tonal shifts from drama and tragedy to lighthearted humor, which threw me off. and 2003 didn't have nearly as much of that, plus it looked better and didn't have "funny" faces like in op's pic.>>282294311buddhism brought us hidamari sketch, please understand.
2003 is not exactly "better" plot wise but it is objectively darker and cooler
>>282293485Take your meds funnyschizo.
on the subject: i just found picrel from google. it turns out despite brotherhood's intended purpose of being more faithful to the manga, of the portions of the story 2003 did adapt, it seems 2003 followed more closely to the manga's paneling. i wonder if there's any comparison photos in existence like this for some of the recent rumiko takahashi renakes? or any other anime which was rebooted which initially came from a manga.>>282294478read the filename, it's not funnyschizo. my guess is he's using funnyschizo's branding to get more replies.
