Should authors draw lewds of their own characters?
>>282371240Absolutely.
>>282371240he cant draw nipples for shit
>>282371286I'd take the occasional one that has something bad about it if it meant more artists had them available.
>>282371286>he
>>282371240Yes.
>>282371240They should draw canon, in-character sex scenes and nothing else
Depends on the situation, when it's done to enhance the original work like Tenchi Muyo then yeah, but if it's just blatant whoring like your example then nah.
I like how Kantoku's "original" characters Shizuku and Kurumi are just thinly veiled Tsukiko and Azusa from Hentai Neko. Any similar cases like this?
>>282371286Proof?
>>282371240I'd say yes, but I think that's generally impossible or impractical in most cases because of ownership rights. A series usually becomes really popular only after it gets an anime. And the author is legally forbidden from making stuff of those characters, lewd or otherwise, cause they don't own the rights to them anymore. The studios or whatever companies sponsor them do. And if they did lewds prior they usually scrub them from the net as best as they can or they don't hit the same way due to their age as old artwork and other factors...
>>282371240where are pictures of these two pregnant?
>>282371665Komaro
>>282371904That one gets ryonad and raped, that's just malice and twisted love.
>>282371240>reverse image search not workingHelp a nigga out here pls.
>>282371240If they want
>>282371286pretty sure Yamamoto's turbopuffy inverted nipples were by skeb request, he draws perfectly acceptable nipples in his actual porn
>>282371286You weren't lying...
>>282371240They all should.
It's literally why half of them become mangaka: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke1YKF3tNCE
>>282371240artist?
>>282372679see you at the food court mangaka
>>282371240Sure, but that's not really lewd. It's just two girls wearing normal everyday clothes.
>>282372270>YamamotoWait, what? Proofs?
>>282373350check any booru, is the most posted one
Hinako note
>>282371240If Ditama Bow is any indication, yes. Absolutely yes.
>>282371240As long as they don't devolve into fetishist shit like what Azu did to Tejina senpai...
>>282375617Wasnt that more because the author got angry over the series being axed?
>>282371240>Should authors draw lewds of their own characters?NO!
>>282372307Best you're getting is an anniversary omake. I don't mind, it's still cute.
>>282371240obligatorily
>>282371240Don't see why not
>>282375924Was it? I thought the fanbox requests happened during the time Saint was being released. Granted, that series' poor sales were likely a reason she decided to whore out her characters.
>>282371240Yes, unless they are the Hinako Note author in which case fuck no please god no more
>>282371240I'd honestly be happy if authors drew more lewds of franchises that they like in general.
>>282378436What? You don't like dicknipples?
>>282371240Only they can handle it. I've seen too many manga just completely lose the plot narratively and there seems to be a correlation between how lewd it gets how bad the story becomes. >>282377554Is a good example. The story just became a mess. The only reason it was there was to get the protag to his next echi scene. It's a real shame because his lewds are great, but I also really like the story and characters, and it's just garbage now. He needed to keep them separate and just do doujins on the side or something.
>>282375924Maybe but maybe she should've stopped doing romcoms and getting mad at readers when no progress happens
>>282379415Tbf it started as an H doujin, but i dropped when cuckshit was getting normalized
>>282371240
