Why is her sexuality so controversial?
Because yuri trannies shit up every thread
>>282461670The second part of the anime, which backpedals on her chemistry with the teacher, in favor of strange sis/mom/mako fanservice, and it shut it down so hard that even the teachers say something like "oh, my, they're still just kids" in the end
>>282461670I don't remember her sexuality being clearly defined in the anime. I know she agrees to a date with Mako at the end, but it's common for Japanese girls to use デート when referring to hanging out one on one. As far as I know it's pretty ambiguous, but maybe there's some secondary material that gives something more concrete one way or the other.
>>282461670I always assumed it was because people generally ship her friend with the large brown guy, so it's less sexuality and more of a shipping thing.
>>282462128Literally no one ships her with Gamagoori. Gamagoori belongs to Mako.
>>282462198Get some reading comprehension
Because anime characters are real people with free will who live in an alternate reality and we watch their lives through a magical camera and if she’s STRAIGHT then that means she’s having sex with MEN with her own free will and now I feel cucked so I’m gonna cry and maybe go off my rocker a little
There can be only one
>>282461670Nobody gives a shit about her relationship with Mako since she's just a gag character. People are gonna love and sexualize her however they want. Saying she's a lesbian is like saying Tracer's a lesbian and expecting everyone to only make lesbian stuff about her it ain't gonna happen.
What's wrong with loving your clothes?
>>282462093Since when has "ambiguous" become the default? The near entirety of the population is attracted exclusively to the opposite sex. The concept of sexual orientation itself is extremely recent and only taken seriously by progressive, who aren’t even close to being a majority even if the elites would like you to think otherwise. Go outside and watch people on the streets and tell me how many same sex couples you see. That shit only exists on the internet and in Hollywood and Netflix shit. A character not having a "confirmed sexuality" obviously means the character is attracted to the opposite sex like every normal person is. In fact, it means the author thought that was so obvious it wasn’t even worth mentioning.
>>282461670she's a minor
>>282461670It's not. She'll take dick and like it.
>>282461670>controversialLol you pushing some fake drama or weird agenda is not controversial
>>282463270This. She's unironically a yarndere. If you consider Senketsu is her boyfriend it recontextualizes pretty much all her dialogue for the entire show.
>>282461670Loving clothes is... well... not exactly a sexuality. It's a fetish. It's ok, many people have fetishes, we don't judge, but it's strage to be so public about it and loudly claim how much you love your clothes and do weird stuff with it, when others can watch. Which is exhibitionist, on top of her fetishism.
>>282461670>controversialNever been controversial. She is hot with Satsuki, hot with Nui and cute with Mako.You newfags think everything is controversial.
>>282467201She is part clothes herself. The fanbase seems to forget that. It's not at all strange for her to hook up with fabric.
>>282461670Probably because 1: Ryuko's sexuality is never really confirmed and it's not a plotpoint at all (and at worst, maybe she's bi) and 2: Yurifags can't help but make everything revolve around them and their demented obsession.
>>282465283ok zoomie
>>282465283She was back then, but she would be Christmas cake by now.
Essentially the only displays of sexuality in the show are>Men ogling Ryuko>Gamagoori being a masochist>Ragyo molesting SatsukiIt's simply not a major focus and Ryuko in particular doesn't really display one at any point
>>282461670Senketsu has felt up her naked body time and time again.
>>282465283
