[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/a/ - Anime & Manga


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why does this exist? the 1995 version has the blade runner/akira problem of being nice to look at but having a lot of pacing issues and being revolutionary for the time but not really holding up because the story is pretty simple and gets aped a lot (though Akira and GitS are both way, way better than blade runner).
Why the fuck would you remake a movie whose best asset is that it was made at the peak of anime technology/quality and redo a bunch of scenes to add shitty cgi shrek grapics?
Also innocence fucking sucked
>no major
>shitty shrek cgi rotoscoping fag shit
>literally every scene they are just out right quoting philosophers for 5 mins
some of the shots are kind of cool/novel but it doesn't make up for the fact it looks way worse than the 1995 film or Akira.
Were Cowboy Bebop in 1998 and 08th ms team (1996-1999) the last time they made a good anime before it completely became muh digisloppa?
>>
zoomers shouldn't be allowed to watch any anime before 2010
>>
this is a body suit, when she's fighting the tank it rips. she specifically picked out a body suit that makes her look naked
>>
>>282631091
>troon
kys tourist, no wonder you have dogshit opinions lol
>>
>>282631905
Yes, only tourists from /v/ and /pol/ who hate anime talk like that. That's why all you do is post contrarian bullshit. No wonder you started this thread to complain about a western remake too with that culture war obsession. You dumbfuck scum can never fit in.
>>
>>282630914
It was still a romantic era when cgi was considered a future
>>
>>282632102
Oh that one lol
Yeah no one really cares because that's just the sort of thing that happens in film industries. There's a reason everyone just recommends 95 as if that doesn't exist.

It's funny that you can never make a post without spewing retarded shit from /pol/
>>
>>282631749
It makes sense for the thermoptic camo I guess
>>
>>282630914
Money.
>>
>>282630914
>not really holding up because the story is pretty simple
you need better bait
>>
>>282632803
the other guy with camo wears a raincoat
>>
>>282630914
I liked Innocence, not sure how much Oshii had to do with 2.0 but he had a real hard on for CG
>>
>>282634502
The general artstyle really isn't that different, just some cg and different environments. Arcitechture was really nice and unique, completely different from the first film. Batou might even be better than Major desu, it really didn't matter. I agree about the philosophical quotes.
>>
>>282634730
the shots in the opening in the alley where the camera is following him down it would also be impractical with drawn backgrounds, and the whole doll house sequence. for me the only parts where the cg looked actually bad were the big chinese floats, those were pretty rough in motion, but i get why people would prefer the other look

desu i felt like Blood was better about blending cg backgrounds for camera movement and 2d characters & static shots, maybe since they weren't also going for a surreal look at the same time.
>>
>>282634730
Yeah 95 is consistantly very pretty. I just liked how the ideas in Innocence were so out there, even more so than the predecessor. I think they are equal films.
>>
>>282635239
I liked the actual story of innocence. but the art was worse, the dialogue was bad, it suffers from not having the major and it's just worse executed than the 1995 film
>>
>>282635368
>early 2000s cgi fever dream
Just might be my soft spot. I really liked Sky Crawlers too and I love ABe anime. Generally I agree with you.
>>
>>282635347
yes any day now I will launch my SMO for control of /a/
>>
>>282635495
No point in talking with that crazy faggot. Unreal delusions, maybe even a falseflag. Nice discussion about gits anon. Im off.
>>
Did I miss something?
>>
>>282630914
>shitty cgi shrek grapics
Post them
>>
Is GitS really better than Blade Runner?
>>
>>282641782
Blade runner is far better
>>
>>282642620
>>282641782
the original blade runner is terrible. gits is far better
>>282641729
the 2008 film and the 2004 film are both on YouTube free with their shitty shrek graphics
>>
>>282642966
Why did you evade your ban?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.