What is the /a/ equivalent of prosefags?>care more about form (how something is written) over content (what it is about)>care little about the plot (despite being deboonked by aristotle) and the point of a book, and make fun of plotfags and pointfags>works they like are unintelligible to the uninitiated
Go back to >>>/lit/ and stop bringing your drama here.
Obviously sakugafags. Though you can still care about content while not being a plotfag if you like slice of life manga/anime. Plot isn't the only form of content.
>>283144063voice actorfags
>>283144063Caring about the form of the medium is bad now?
>>283144063I don't read books, so I don't know what this shit means
>>283144063The reason people make fun of plotfags is because due to their inability to read audio visual cues they miss 85% of the plot they pretend to care about. They deserve to be ridiculed.
>>283144063>>283144606Also stop comparing prose to audio visual artistry. Literature hardly even plays with phenomenology and it impacts the consumers experience.
>>283144063What do you mean it was "deboonked by aristotle"Speak English retard
People who care more about tags than the artstyle have the shittiest taste.
>>283144063Form is content, information is conveyed visually. Dialogue is for losers.
>>283145792>show don't tellt. midwit
