If a short girl with large breasts is a shortstack or an oppai loli, then what is a short girl with a flat chest but wide hips and plump thighs/butt?they can't be shortstacks as well since the term "stacked" refers to the breasts
>>283607100I can see her pussy this is nsfw
The obvious title would be "Shortcake"
>>283607158I concurr.Meeting adjourned.
>>283607158Wisdom.
>>283607100A midna.
Kyojiri.
>>283607100This pic is going to the feetfolder
it's called bottom heavy.
>>283607265>seconds before leglock cunnilingus
>>283607100>then what is a short girl with a flat chest but wide hips and plump thighs/butt?The best, that's what.
>>283607413
>>283607100Nobody cares to make a distinction for short. It's just a pear body.
>>283607245Sort of like oppai, right?
>>283607100child bearing hips
>>283607100>they can't be shortstacks as well since the term "stacked" refers to the breastsYou would think so, but I've seen the term shortstack being used for them, as well.
>>283608502Because shortstacks typically also have thick thighs and big butts along with huge tits. They're stacked all over.
>>283607100Elin
>>283607158This term clould get confusing. Cake has connotations already, some of these aren't cake.
>>283607141Then stop looking, you pervert
Pear shaped supremacy
>>283607158The perfect name for the perfect body plan.
>>283608200Yes. Kyojiri (巨尻) means "big ass", so a kyojiri loli is a loli with wide hips/fat ass, like Kanna.
>>283607100people have been trying to coin the term shortcake but I still prefer pear
>>283607100I thought it was called pear body but >>283607158 works too
>>283608847why is she naked if she is seemingly just arrived home and taken her shoes off?
>>283607245I don't like this term, it feels like a hot word on the FBI watchlist
>>283607158When I hear a woman described as a cake, I think of an older single woman, not a woman with wide hips and plump thighs.
https://i.4cdn.org/gif/1762230573581510.mp4
>>283607100Pear shaped
zoomers obsession with overcategorization should be studied
>>283610640Millennials started it with x-core, y-core, etc.
>>283607100they are built for tight hotdogging, with accidentally slipping your dick into them
>>283610640It's not "overcategorization" to want a term for a very specific archetype.
>>283610776yes that's exactly what overcategorization is
>>283610640the new shortcake thing is just so one guy can make lolicon threads on /v/ without getting nuked by mods immediately.
>>283607100kill yourself
>>283610776Sometimes it's necessary. It's better to go too far in that direction than the opposite where people try to expand a term or shift the definition to include things that are completely different.
>>283610328That's because you're thinking of christmas cakeCake is also commonly used to refer to the ass
>>283610901That happened pretty badly with tomboy, to the point where that word has barely any meaning
>>283610959ironically enough tomboy has been so misused that I think ye olden definition of how it was used is now no longer a tomboy now.
>>283607100thicc lolis.
>>283610946It has never been used like that on /a/, there's only ever been christmas cake and delicious cake.
>>283607158I call her a cupcake.
>>283610946says who
>>283610472
>>283610946You're missing one
>>283610959Tomboy had the opposite problem as this thread where it's so vague it can apply to anything, I'm pretty sure at its core it's just girl that acts/looks masculine and doesn't act feminineThe thing is society has never been able to pin down what masculine is supposed to be over all of history so everyone has a different definition of what masculine is at this point, and the same for what a girl is supposed to act like
>>283611472https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cake
>>283607100The "Sexo"
>>283607158Anything "cake" just sounds like a description of a hag...
>>283613042Christmas cake isn't the first kind of cake I think of desu
Caked-up cunny
>>283607158/Thread
>>283611218touch grass, literally. go outside and talk to people.
>>283610328ESL or just autism?
>>283607158Sage knowledge has been shared with us on this most holy day.
>>283610946An I hear cake used for Christmas cakes way more than for butts. At least around here.
>>283616100u caked up sister fr fr
Rather than top heavy or bottom heavy, I like my girls middle heavy.I like my girls heavy in the waist, but I can also see their ribs. Only one thing produces this lovely combo
>>283607100Loli = body type has always been a retarded coping argument.Loli is slang for "lolita" which specifically refers to young girls between the ages of 9 and 14, based off the original novel.Petite adult women are not lolitas.Midgets and fantasy races are not lolitas.
>>283616367>Pregnant loliAbsolute fucking diamonds
>>283616693Even if you think that we have Gohou lolis and lolibabas to refer to not underage lolis.
>>283616693The term loli has nothing to do with Nabokov's novel beyond it's popularity inspiring the nameThe first ever usage of "lolita complex" was by a magazine editor to refer to his infatuation with college students of a particular school, which he deemed as cuter than another institution's
Neotony
>>283616885Got a source for that?
>>283616774At this point this shit doesn't mean anything beyond erokawaii
>>283607100Shortstacks need to have both tits *and* assWhere to do you think the stack comes from?
>>283608765Based and true
>>283607100
>>283620141Zamn
>>283620141Pretty good
Shortcake loli cunny ass thread
>>283616100>hey /a/ just be a normalfag Where do you think you are? Go back to tiktok, you stupid zoomer newfag.
>>283620141Pretty awful
>>283607100Sexpear
>>283620141Choppy animation is choppy.The problem with AI animation right now is that when the framerate is too high, it has an uncanny valley effect, yet it can't convincingly replicate the way anime is typically animated on the 3's, so when the framerate is more anime-like, it just looks choppy instead of like quality human-drawn animation on the 3's.I don't think a model is going to get anime-style animation right until they train one solely on anime, and even then it might not get it right.I have yet to see an AI-animated anime-style clip that I thought looked great.
>>283607100HEY WAIT A MINUTEWE JUST HAD A KYOJIRI THREAD
>>283621348god. I'm glad I'm not the only one. I haven't been able to watch anything on an actual tv for 10-15 years because they switched to a higher frame rate. For some reason it's fine on a computer though (probably something related to compression algorithms)
>>283607158
zamn
So many pics and movement about Tasumaki she appeared like 30 secs on s1 and s2 in fact her sister has more screen time.
>>283621894The manga featured both in a special chapter that was made pretty early on. That kickstarted them hard.
>>283607100shartstock
>>283608847What character/artist is this, reverse image searching is not helping
>>283623720Filename, anon.
>>283623720Shit, it's ai
>like image>who made that image>oh it's AI>shit now I don't like itMental illness.
>>283607100the word you're looking for is "disgusting"
>>283623834I do still like the image, I saved it and all, but now that I've figured it's ai, I can't help but to see the imperfections/inconsistencies, which does bring it down a pegAi art can produce something that looks good, but I can't respect it fully
>>283623889>I can't help but to see the imperfections/inconsistenciesThe stairs are a rather glaring flaw, yes.The difference between a slopgenner and an actual artist is an actual artist will fix that with effort and inpainting, and possibly using an image editor to guide the inpainting.AI is absolutely a tool which can be used to create art. Artists have control over all seven elements of art with AI tools like Controlnet, and AI-generated images can be refined to be flawless via inpainting, which can sometimes take hours of genuine hard work by an artist.Most people just input a prompt and post what the model shits out on the internet, though, leading to people having a dismissive attitude towards AI-generated imagery because almost all they see is lazy, glaringly-flawed dogshit.
>>283621348Also, anime is often animated with variable speed that fits the motion.
>>283624238Yeah, it's usually on the 3's but is sometimes on the 2's or 1's as needed.An AI model obviously isn't going to be able to know what is appropriate for each distinct motion.
>>283623834Being interested in the artist implies interest in a consistent artstyle. How often do genners stay put on a single style?
>>283624323Did Picasso stay put on a single style?
>>283624323Did Miles Davis stay put on a single style?
>>283624341>>283624376Ganges drinking mind cannot comprehend why others don't worship its god
>>283610640Millennials' obsession with zoomers should be studied.Boomers' obsession with overcategorization was already studied 25 years ago in the book "Otaku: Japan's database animals". A great book btw, highly recommended to any anime fan.
>>283624394Here, I'll answer the question for you:No, Picasso and Miles Davis did not stay put on a single style. In fact, both were renowned for constantly evolving their style and consistently staying at the forefront of the evolution of their respective artforms for long periods of time.And no, I am not a jeet.Please improve your rhetoric.
>>283624341No, but do you like all of Picasso's art? I think his cubist period art is the nicest to look at, but don't really care about the rest. Call me a philistine, but for me the artist is basically a keyword for more shit in a given style. Obviously it drifts over time, but I don't think an abrupt shift in style is desirable from casual appreciation perspective.Nowadays I think people publish under alts for such stylistic jumps if they do them. Genners switch styles as often as their prompt changes, which makes the keyword function of their handle fairly useless.
>>283624500>No, but do you like all of Picasso's art?I don't like any of it haha. I do like most of Miles Davis' output, though.I think I get what you're trying to say, though.I don't think you're trying to argue AI-generated images can't be art, and >>283624341 and >>283624376 were meant to point out that if that's what you were arguing when you said >>283624323 then that's a really bad way of arguing it.Now I think you're saying it's understandable to be disappointed when you discover an image you like is AI because that implies there's a good chance there's not a lot more like it for you to consume because genners change style so often.If that's what you're saying, that's completely reasonable.
>>283624577>an image you like is AI because that implies there's a good chance there's not a lot more like it for you to consume because genners change style so oftenIn practice yes. I'd prefer that they simply share the prompt and model/LoRA's used instead.
>>283608765Sadly it doesn't exist in real life.
>>283624633>I'd prefer that they simply share the prompt and model/LoRA's used instead.Yeah obviously that's something you'll see more on Civitai than other places.I think some genners are reluctant to share what artist tags they're using because they don't want artists to get butthurt they're using their tags.The way I feel about that is encapsulated by the following song lyrics:And if the whole world's singing your songsAnd all of your paintings have been hungJust remember what was yoursIs everyone's from now onAnd that's not wrong or rightBut you can struggle with it all you likeYou'll only get uptight
>>283624663>Yeah obviously that's something you'll see more on Civitai than other places.Why can't it stay in those places? When I go to pixiv I expect human drawn stuff, not hip-hop-esque art sampling. Genners publishing their shit in places that aren't for genning in specific just muddles the puddle in a bad way.We need reverse search that points to such places instead of generic boorus and old-school art platforms by proxy.
>>283624891I think posting it on Pixiv is fine if you check the box that says it's AI so those who wish to filter it can.It's the people who intentionally don't do that to get more views/bookmarks/likes who are being assholes about it. They know exactly what they're doing.>Why can't it stay in those places?Civitai and Pixiv have different rules and that's a part of it.
>>283620141*3 hands at one point try again
>>283616693>refers to young girls between the ages of 9 and 14, based off the original novel.Incorrect. The term Nabokov used for those girls was "nymphet", not lolita.
>>283610640internet generations put more emphasis on naming tropes and archetypes because of the importance of tag-based search enginessource: I made it the fuck up
>>283623834>that girl is hot>oh beneath that mask it's a tranny>shit now I don't like itPerfectly normal.
>>283623834perfectly valid sentiment, slopper
>>283626594>that girl is hot>it's a trannyNo tranny was ever hot
>>283607100I would rape her feet
>>283624663>because they don't want artists to get butthurtNo, it's because aitards not only think it takes skill (lmao) to write a prompt but they are also arrogant and hypocritical enough to think that a prompt is their property so they don't want anyone else to "steal" it.
>>283626739It can be "good enough" for those with low standards.So also like AI.
>>283627137>It can be "good enough"It can't, if you fell for a tranny you were a fag from the very beginning.
>thread derailed into a retarded argument>pic is not even AIAt least I know I'm talking to real people, because no AI can fake that level of genuine retardation.
>>283627176You get used to it
>>283607100Feet
>>283610776People will call you pedo still regardless of what you call these girls
I too like anime girls that have no boobs, but a big ass
>>283627936
Flatties with big butts are the best
>>283608444A Child, bearing hips.
green
>>283620473It gave her 3 hands.
cool thread
Bottom heavy flat-chests are meant to be shared with anons
>>283607100PSPPortablePlapStation
We call them "Built".
what
>>283607100>>283607158You've already made this thread. I've already seen this "conversation" three times now. You need to stop.
You need to slop
Slop this, slop thatI just want to sloppily make out with a cute girl's butt
>>283628319kek
>>283607158>>283607245Shortcake is clever and goes with shortstack but kyojiri loli goes with oppai loli. And I know on which side I am.
>>283635085People use both shortstack and loli depending on the context, why can't we?
>>283627899This is the black pill
I fucking love pears/bottom heavy/shrotcake/kyojiri so much
>>283637055
>>283638056You know this may sound a little extreme but I think this guy is the greatest artist who ever lived.
>>283638128It's really too bad that this manga was axed
>>283627899Damn
