>Censored all the scenes of Happosai grabbing Ranma's boobs aside from a single one >Cut Happosai touching Ranma's ass from the remake entirely >Censored Happosai lifting the girls' skirts exposing their underwear >Censored Happosai stealing underwear Bravo MAPPA
>>283639058
>>283639058>>283639067
>>283639096>>283639067>>283639058
>>283639058>>283639067>>283639096The 1989-1992 anime wins again
I don't really give a shit honestly
>>283639058Fuck these faggots. Total cucks.
>>283639504>t.
>>283639245Me when I see booba
Prudes need to take their own advice and sensor themselves out of existence.
>>283639567Nah, it's more like you've been spamming this and I stopped caring
>>283639058>>Cut Happosai touching Ranma's ass from the remake entirelyNot entirely. They just cut one particular scene with that happening.Also the other stuff may be in later episodes (the underwear stealing will 100% be) but they had to cram 7 chapters in one episode this time.
>>283639067>>283639096Bravo Mappa
A shame
>>283639058Why even include him at that point
>>283639058Everyone knew it was going to be a shit remake. Still upset or surprised, when it's a shit remake...
>>283639058OH NO CENSORING A KIDS SHOW TO BE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR KIDS THE HORROR. Grow up you have porn.
>>283639058Be better if they just cut out all the nudity and Happosai honestly, fanservice always felt forced anyways.
>>283640450tranny see >>283639567
'member when faggots here defending nu-Ranma censorship by saying "it's more consistent with the manga"? Now they're doing the whole "I-I stopped caring because y-you le s-spam!!" shtick after being BTFO'd by facts.
>>283640450>jUsT wAtCh PoRn on fucking /a/Kill yourself, retarded tourist.
>>283640450Glad that you tourists finally accepts the fact that you've been watching shit for kids. Dumb twats.
>>283640607The new series is better because by this point, the original anime had already devolved into filler shit and dragging itself out for ages.
>>2836405804Kids dub of One Piece is better because it makes the show funny.>>283640608Just watch porn.
>>283639058MAPPA are cowards. Never thought I'd see the day they revealed their beta bitch power level.
Happosai's powerlevel is too much for Mappa to handle
>>283639058Not being faithful to the source material should be grounds for being fired and blacklisted. It's akin to vandalism.
>>283640726YWNBAW
>>283640726I dont think he jerks off to ranma. I dont think thats the point he trying to make either.
>>283640790Buzzwords and phrases.
>>283640789Is this your first anime?
>>283640800What point? Ranma's nudity has no use in the actual plot it's pointless, I'm no prude but like the nudity adds nothing to the story.
>>283639058Now this is some great stuff but the nipples have to stay
>>283639058Happosai is a shit character anyway so I'm glad they're fucking up his arc.
>>283639058Good. Lewdness has no place in children's media.
It funny how everyone one hated Happosai from the 90s to early 2010s, but now because of culture wars, people are pretending that he was always popular & only "tourists" hated him.
Imagine unironically censoring out all the nudity, fanservice and perverted antics out of an ECCHI franchise, what’s next, taking out the mechs out of a mecha? Or Magical Girl transformations out of a Magical Girl series?>>283640450>Ranma>kids showIt was THE Ecchi series that pretty much invented the entire ecchi genre retarded newfag zoom-zoom.
>>283641095>Late 2010s
>>283639058>>283639067>I'd rather just hump a slut's leg with my nuts shaved
>>283641096>It was THE Ecchi series that pretty much invented the entire ecchi genreNo, that was To Love-Ru newfag.
>>283641134>AIka
>>283639067>>283639096Souless
>>283641096The original Ranma anime aired in a primetime television slot. Ecchi series were restricted to OVAs back then.
>>283641096>It was THE Ecchi seriesThat was Urusei YatsuraRanma was the anime most people didn't like unless it was among their first anime
>>283641272Having a few topless moments doesn't make a series ecchi.
>adapt ecchi manga>remove all the ecchiWhy do they keep doing this? And there's at least some logic in adapting a new series to ride on the hype but why adapt a 30+ year old ecchi series you know you won't be able to faithfully reproduce?That being said, I also don't understand why people watch an anime they know they'll dislike (and know will not faithfully reproduce the source like this) and then spend their time complaining about it. >>283639567Why don't you use examples of the One Piece anime being censored in Japan? These are really apples and oranges and plenty of people do defend anime changes as some retarded need to be different from the source material even if the changes have nothing to do with the differences between anime and manga as a medium. Until animefags are consistent with what they complain about, people are going to keep treating you like retards. >>283640789The original anime was not faithful to the source material either. See above.
>acting like you didn't know all along that this is exactly what was going to happenI'm surrounded by retards
>>283641210>The original Ranma anime aired in a primetime television slot. No pretty sure it was always a late night anime.
>>283639245>>283639576Female Ranma sexo
>>283641498>late night anime in 1989
>>283639245funny that you say that when Sasuke is there
>>283641095I don't know about the rest but I always liked him. I'm a manga only fag though.
>>283641450>ecchi mangaNo
>>283641210>Ecchi series were restricted to OVAs back then.No you’re thinking of straight up hentai, Ecchi anime aired on TV just late-night.>>283640998>children’s mediaRanma was NEVER children’s media and I’m tired of you zoomer newfags trying to rewrite history like this. There’s a reason it was never picked up for license to air on American public television, even though it was one of the most popular anime IPs at the time that defined the millennial anime boom.Pokemon, DBZ, Sailor Moon, Cardcaptor Sakura, Yugioh, Digimon, all eventually aired on U.S. public broadcasting, hell even the first true spiritual successor to Ranma that was the start of the more traditional harem genre, Tenchi Muyo was broadcast on Cartoon Network (albeit in a heavily edited and censored form) that they didn’t even bother doing for Ranma, you know why? Because Ranma was ALWAYS deemed much too raunchy and sexual to even try.It wasn’t even able to air on the actual fucking Adult Swim timeslot like the next Rumic series Inuyasha, that’s how ecchi the series was considered back in the day. Even it’s manga volumes were straight up given a 16+ older teen rating compared to the usual PG-13 rating most other manga got.
>>283641498Late Night anime weren't a thing back then dumbass. They didn't become a thing until post Evangelion.
>>283641498>>283641552Ranma 1/2 was in a primetime slot (Saturday at 7:30pm) but got cancelled after 18 episodes and moved to a lesser time slot (Fridays at 5:30pm). This is why the quality of the show nosedives and there's more outsourcing present, but that time slot apparently benefitted the show.Additionally, it was not aired on an 'ecchi' channel, it was aired on Fuji TV, and when production concluded, it was rebroadcast on stations for younger viwers (according to the Japanese wiki page, at least).
>>283641719>>283641758Ecchi doesn't mean "for adults" like you seem to be taking it. A large part of Ranma is nudity and fanservice, and it definitely is an ecchi series. It has more ecchi than modern series labeled ecchi and was actually allowed to have nudity.
>>283641794Ecchi isn't a genre in Japan. It's just an American label for anime containing female nudity.
>>283641758>Ranma 1/2 was in a primetime slot (Saturday at 7:30pm) but got cancelled after 18 episodes and moved to a lesser time slot (Fridays at 5:30pm). This is why the quality of the show nosedives and there's more outsourcing present, but that time slot apparently benefitted the show.>Additionally, it was not aired on an 'ecchi' channel, it was aired on Fuji TV, and when production concluded, it was rebroadcast on stations for younger viwers (according to the Japanese wiki page, at least).Sauce? This all sounds fake, I can’t believe the anime was aimed at younger viewers with all that nudity, fanservice and fucking Happosai it had…
>>283639567You are just at another point. I don't see you complaining about why Bugs Bunny can no longer eat watermelon with big red lips full of gunsmoke in his face after Elmer shoot him with his shotgun.
>>283641874Like I said, this is all on the Japanese wikipedia page.For the cancellation though, you can just look at broadcast times, and the fact that the series changed its name after Episode 18 to "Ranma 1/2: Nettouhen".For the time slot switch, that's also on the JP wiki page, and the JP wiki page made note of how it specifically aired on children's programs predominately for rebroadcasts.
>>283641521Based
>>283641874You know the manga was in a shonen magazine right?>>283641870Yeah, I'm sure Japan has no awareness of pieces of media that focus on fanservice and nudity. Even ignoring that the term ecchi is used to refer to situations involving that kind of stuff, the Japanese Wikipedia page of the series has the genre お色気 on it, which I guess serves the purpose of what we'd call ecchi anime/manga. >お色気漫画（おいろけまんが）は、日本における漫画のジャンルの一種で、軽度の性的な描写を含む漫画のことである。
>ITT anons Suprise Pikachu shocked that this franchise which was already woke for it’a time decides to go even more woke for it’s current year remakeI don’t know why everyone is so surprised, Ranma was always woke tranny propaganda. Ranma xirself is a DEI protagonist of the highest order and Rumiko’s next work Inuyasha continued the woke trend of being racemixing propaganda with another DEI type protagonist, this time in the form of a mulatto-coded mixed race mutt. (It also helped further the BBC cuckholdery agenda considering all the half-demon mutts are born from demon fathers and human mothers)Rumiko was always a lefty woketard, stop watching and reading Rumicslop.
>>283640716By this point the original anime had had exactly one filler episode, and it was a pretty funny one focusing on a character Rumiko had abandoned at that point anyway.
>>283641096>>283641134>>283641155>>283641272It was Harenchi Gakuen you dumb newfucks.
>>283642057>You know the manga was in a shonen magazine right?The magazine it was published in, Shonen Sunday, always had an older demographic than Shonen Jump.
>>283639058Good. it was always gay to touch the trans boy.>>283640450that propaganda is obscenity that yields reddit and should not be corrupting youth in the first place.
>>283639058More like Crappa
>>283642166Talking about anime here, nobody cares what Nagai was scribbling for pennies over in the magazines.
>>283639058Netflix mandate
>>283641907>comparing two different pieces of media from two separate countries from two vastly different points in time and cultureYou are this fucking retarded.
>>283639058They made these changes to appeal to kids, but then, why pick something that would just end up censored and stray from the original work? The real problem is regulation, there should be more anime actually made for kids. Ranma was chosen because it’s popular. Older fans will watch it anyway, and now they can target younger audiences(or do they even sell any merch with this?). Times change, of course, and you can’t show certain things anymore, that's is why it’s censored( and soulless). My idea would be something like a quality or quantity control, where popular mangaka or studios are required to make kid oriented shows. It's complicated, like why are the shows censored everywhere, they could sell 2 types like what they do to blu-rays. But again the one show is cheaper to make, one PG for everyone. ((()))
>>283642599Brappa
>>283641096Ranma still a kid show, just Japanese standards for what's ok have changed and seems they want keep Ranma for kids, Devilman was a kids manga in 70's but new anime for adults.
>>283643618>Ranma still a kid showKids as in teens? Yes. Kids as in elementary schoolers? No.
>>283641725>Ranma was NEVER children’s media Standards change on what ok for kids on TV/manga in Japan same as US.
>>283643667
>>283643667>Ranma coloring bookNo fucking way…
>>283639096Most cringe censorship yet
>>283641907That's not anime, idiot.
>>283641725Why DID they never air Ranma in the U.S.? Was it because it’s very premise was too LGBT and so would’ve triggered all the Conservatives?
>>283643950https://archive.retroreprints.com/show/1143/archives
>>283644458It was a VHS show.
>>283643998Just you wait
>>283639058They should have censored Happosai by just removing him entirely
>>283639067>>283639096LMAO NEUTERED
>>283642797Lack of empathy does this. You are incapable of visualizing the apple as you only view things through the argument you are making in a vacuum. You can't realize that both take the same approach: societal views on the matter.Or why do you think is the reason? Maybe you'll surprise me.
>>283644093>Lack of empathy
>>283641920>the JP wiki page made note of how it specifically aired on children's programs predominately for rebroadcasts.Was that version also censored?
>>283644458probably because the nudity wouldn't fly well on american TV, and early 90s, very very very very very few people would consider cartoons as something for non-elementary schoolers, so good luck selling ranma nipples to a network that airs cartoons like nickoloedeon or WB kids.straight to unrated VHS, parental guidance advised.
>>283639245Here anon, trimmed out Sasuke and Happosai out of this one.
>>283648133And what is this captcha???
>>283639058this episode felt like 5 episodes compressed into onenot enough space to digest what the hell is going on
>>283639058Souless
