How do you interpret anime? Which side are you on?>Biographical Criticism: meaning comes the authorial intent, through analyzing the author's life>New Criticism: meaning comes from what the text says>Reader-response theory: meaning comes from what the reader feels
>>283653899How is there any debate against the first one?
I don't, I'm not fond of smelling my own farts.
>>283654041This but the second. A certain English woman author is proof enough the first is invalid. HOWEVER the first used in conjunction for specific passage for indeed matter
>>283654240>HOWEVER the first used in conjunction for specific passage for indeed matterIs that not the implication?
Interpretation entails taking no side, retard.The moment you take a side and disregard the other three you break the three intentio principle which stands as the core of any basic interpretation attempt.Interpretation isn't about picking sides between the text, the reader or the author, but shaving all the shit that doesn't make sense when you consider these things.Fucking high school dropouts, I swear to god.
>>283653899Interpretation is merely a way of enjoying a work. It doesn't matter what your interpretation is, only that the process satisfies you. It is no more significant than solving crosswords.
>>283653899
>>283653899anime is real
>>283653899It's just text
>>283654269no, there are people who read a line from a biography and ignore the entire text. The author prefers coca-cola to pepsi, the work is about that now. expect 100 anti-pepsi threads on the catalog for (you)s.
I'm pretty sick of readers. I've read what the readers have to say and they're fucking retards.
I laugh = I keep watchingI don't laugh = I stop watchingI don't know much less authors and all I watch anime for is to relax.
