>3DPDx39best or worst isekai scenario?
>>284589111I've read one manga where the mc was a shota and the women were very masculine. he had to keep dodging their advances to avoid being raped. there's also a sliders episode about this where the men are kidnapped and stuffed into breeding facilities and have no rights. I think it's the worst if the gender roles are reversed because you're surrounded by women who all act like men
>>284589111There's probably an optimum ratio where there are more women than men so competition is lower and women are less choosy, without the ratio being so high that society is some kind of absurd matriarchy which puts men in prison and gives them no freedom because they are a state asset. I'm not sure what the ratio is, but I bet 1:39 is too high. 1:5 sounds good.
>>284589111That's just Paraguay after that war that killed like half of all the men
>>2845909921:39 only enforces monthly semen collection for men as far as restricting their freedoms goes.
>>284590992>1:39 is too highthe first twenty chapters are all about softcore incest so you're not wrong>>284592806Battle of Tuyuti convinced me to never take up military arms>reading about it>author explains that it became harder to retreat as more men died and their dead bodies took up space and got more men killedfucking brutal
>>284592806It really is like that.
>>284589111>1:39 ratioIf you want to avoid a feminist matriarchal dystopia then guys need to be built like engineer level superhumans.
>>284590992There is a manga about a world with a 1:5 ratio too
>>284589111>last chapter 16 days agobros...
>>284595917The concept of an engineer race is cool. The fact that they create races on barren planets is just.... So cool. I get the same cool vibe from the Blade runner world human like synths but what about interesting weird creatures and engineered organisms? I think they were briefly shown in the original movie Imaging genetically engineering the perfect girl for you...
>>2845909921:5 is still comically high, even a relatively modest 1:1.5 ratio would be more than enough. You have to realize that even with a 1:1.5 ratio it would be mathematically impossible for a third of all women to ever be in a monogamous permanent relationship. The societal pressure on women in a 1:1.5 world would be so high that the vast majority of them would be desperate to enter a relationship.
>>284597601the point isn't to just get laid, it's to get hunted by sexually frustrated women
>>284597652What do you actually mean by that? Do you just want to flip the gender dynamics so that women are expected to initiate or do you want even 1/10 men to be scared of leaving their homes because they'd be assaulted by 8+/10 women? Because if it's the former then a 1:1.5 is definitely more than enough.
>>284597601I do wonder how much more socially acceptable non-monogamy would be in a 1:1.5 world
If that happened women would probably have to fight over you desu.
>>284598282You are thinking too much about it, it is a premise solely to surround the self insert with hot women who craves the D.
>>284598282the problem with your statement is that you are assuming society stays monogamous in such a situation, in reality a lot of them would share and men would not be that valuable as they can handle 2 wives each
