I dislike convenient leg placement
>>285332278Who's that next to Nadeko? I feel like I watched the show but can't remember which one it was.
You lost
It's hotter that way.
imagination is always superior to reality
>>285332278Move the legs!!! I want to see every one of those odorous pairs of pantsu
>>285332278It is often bad, but convenient hair placement is worse.
>>285332558some of them are nopan.
>>285333861Every girl in that image probably wears panties, but since there are no shots in their respective series that explicitly show bare skin where panties would normally be, it's impossible to say for certain that they do or do not wear panties. Schrodinger's Panties is very real. I choose to believe that they wear panties though because panties are way sexier than nopan.
Kuroneko's pantsu were visible in that scene though
>>285334064Why are they only visible on one side? It looks a little awkward
>>285332278That a new name for it?
>>285334765What else would you call it? Censorship technically applies but that's a broad term that encompasses all of its many forms, with convenient leg placement being one of them.
>>285332307Akane from gridman
>>285332278And ladies dislike showing their panties so they sit properly
>>285335535based
>>285335144Girls cross legs when they sit
>>285335535Why do they wear skirts if they don't want to show their panties?
>>285334765"Convenient censoring" has been a tag on the boorus for as long as I've known them. You use it on pictures for say, hair just barely covering nipples, thick steam only covering genitals, random blades of grass just barely covering their slit
>>285333747How does hair block panties?
I can't stop imagining
>>285338728I can only hope Colette’s pantsu are the same way.
>>285332379this is such a midwit's take and shows that the person saying it has no imagination at all. first to take the presented situation at face value: can titillation be exciting? yes, but at the same time if you know that you will always be cockblocked no matter what it turns around and becomes unexciting. for example if a girl in a skirt walks over a shiny spot on the floor you would be watching it closely to try to see her panties, but if you knew that seeing panties was impossible, like if she had shorts on under her skirt, you probably wouldn't bother. these shows that always put something in the way and never show panties are like the shorts.second in a general sense: if you can't imagine situations where seeing panties or even bare ass is more exciting you have no creativity. for example imagine a naked girl in an empty void. you might think this isn't very exciting and it would be more interesting if she was in a sexy outfit. now imagine that she is naked but in a bathroom. this is more exciting, but maybe it's still too mundane. now imagine the same view, but with a red dot and a battery indicator in the corner. the subject hasn't changed at all, but by changing a few elements surrounding it the scenario has become exciting. a "boring" naked girl has now become the subject of a hidden camera recording. does she know about the camera? how would she react if she found out? there are so many aspects that you could write a short story about it, and all it took was a little imagination. if you can't do this yourself you are basically a npc.
>>285334169Panties can migrate up the crack and become asymmetrical. Especially with rotational movement from say... sitting on a bed like that.
>>285336274Girls are all about fashion, and more importantly attracting men. 90% of what they do is dedicated to getting male attention. They absolutely know that they need to ride the line of pure:slut just right to get the man they want, per the morals of the day. You don't show panties because that is slutty, but you show leg to get the man interested because it's not considered slutty. Because showing NO leg results in 0 male interest & attention, and that is bad.
>>285338728Why does the skirt magically appear beneath her in the second shot? How did it do that?
>>285341389the images you're witnessing are actually drawn, they aren't real.
>>285339839>90% of what they do is dedicated to getting male attentionYou seriously underestimate how much of that is dedicated to competing with other women. Anything you see that's cosmetic but doesn't interest you isn't for you, it's for war.
>>285332278>>285338728>>285342137Why does this infuriate me?
>>285332278without it these wouldn’t have even been aired
>>285341565They were so focused on censoring the panties that they didn't notice how they fucked up the continuity between shots. Their priorities need adjusting.
>>285342137I love looking at poses like this for 30 minutes then typing an asterisk and cumming instantly
>>285342451That's one of the problems with this kind of censoring. They are more concerned with making sure nothing can be seen while picking angles that most often should show something, and don't care so much about continuity or physics.
>>285339733>midwitopinion discarded
>>285332278
