Does Wikipedia do a good job explaining what anime is?
>Does Wikipedia do a good job No.
reminder wikipedia made 180+ million dollars last year but only spent a little over 3 million on actual hosting, and they still have the gall to beg for donations
>Does Wikipedia do a good jobYass
Hopefully not. I want the sort of person who looks up anime on wikipedia, or asks an LLM that draws on wikipedia, to get as many misconceptions about it as possible.I really tried not to read from the OP image, but I couldn't help noticing>emergent technologiesThat's not what "emergent" means. Wikipedia is full of word use errors like that because it's written mostly by pseuds who are indirectly on the payrolls of various governments via NGO money laundering.
>>emergent technologieswhat the hell it's realis there an edit war over this stuff lol
>>287787004If it doesn't, you can fix it yourself, can't you?
>>287787004At least it chose a decent show as an example
>>287787272>>287789010>emergent>Emerging; coming into view or into existence; nascent; new.>Arising unexpectedly, especially if also calling for immediate reaction. You're tourists if you don't know that anime has done exactly that. As soon as digipaint/digital compositing and CGI became viable in the production process they were tested.
It's so cool how AI has made people think Wikipedia is a good and reliable source of information now
>>287790793>luddites are lame teachers from 2001 who cried at wikipedialmao
