>introduces swordsman as some kind of local legend>everyone he meets makes some fuss after they learn who he is>jobs to every single opponent so far over the one thing he's supposed to be good atWhy do this shit? It's one thing if it's in a no-holds barred fight, but he keeps losing in pure swordsmanship against swordsmen who are contesting him in swordsmanship. And somehow he's earned a reputation as a swordsman.
>>287883248>posts an image of someone losing to something that isn't a sword
>>287883248I'm not a swordsman, so maybe it's different but I had quite a reputation as a chess player at school despite never actually winning a single game by the simple expedient of:1. At the start of the game play four completely random moves in response to whatever action my opponent decides2. At the start of my fifth move pick up a piece then shake my head and put it back saying "No no, I shall of course have to resign. How clever of you."3. When my opponent asks me why respond "Well you're bound to take my [high value piece] ins sixteen moves, and after that well... unless unless, no you've foxed me there as well. Well played."4. Shake their hand, stand up and walk away shaking my head and muttering "absolutely extraordinary"
>>287883445you sound like a massive fucking autist holy shit
>>287883445holy kek please tell me you aren't making shit up
>>287883445holy fuck my sides anon. i concede, your /a/utism reigns supreme.
>>287883445
