Women like this hold a special place in my heart I wish they were more popular
>>291181467Have some self-respect.
>>291181467>>>/r/
>>291181467Have less self-respect.
>>291181467What do you call this besides "jimiko?"
>>291181654Jimiko might be the only way to describe these girls plain face with a banging body and lewd personality is sub category so I don't know what would be a good name
I too am a fan of Kasumi Nomura
>>291181654Fem otaku
>>291181467
>>291182354Kasumi is beautiful so I don't think she fits in the jimiko archetype >>291182459that's just what they are not the specific niche of this
>>291182671>Kasumi is beautiful She's fairly plain in the manga IIRC, and is only really attractive when compared to Hanako and Olivia
>>291181654Meganekko?
>>291182689I'd argue she's at least a 7.5 which is above average
>>291182780Our opinion, unfortunately, is likely to be biased due to our attraction towards the elements that create a jimiko. I'd say that we'd get a statistically different result from anons in this thread in rating the attractiveness of characters posted here than we would from a more general perception, and (importantly) from the intention of the mangaka.
>>291182877You certainly make a valid assertation while our bias for this type of woman do inhibit clear and objective ranking I do think the average person would consider kasumi attractive
>>291182918I don't think they'd rate her as unattractive or ugly, I think she'd fall towards the middle with a small boost because she's fairly stacked. Which to me would put her in the "objective Jimiko" class of roughly 4-6
>>291183004Solid point then I retract my previous statement it seems I was indeed still influenced by bias(and big boobs).
>>291183065No need for a retraction, we're joined by the sacred bond of jimiko love
