Under the Sea Edition!A thread for posting Disney girls and Princesses from any setting.>Bonus for Ariel>No futa shit>No gay shit or solo males, but lesbians are okay>No queen of spades cringe>No gas or onara>No dramaThread Question>How easily would dating a mermaid be irl?
Oh also no ugly bastardsPrevious thread>>7946668
>>8087115I just wish for Eugene to befriend Elsa and seduce her with his rogueish charms. I wish for him to be invited to Anna's wedding and bring the Coronian guard with him as security. I wish for him to dance with Elsa, slowly and intimately. I want him to lean in her ear, his breath making her blush and wet before he whispers "Rapunzel send her regards". Then I want the guards to slaughter everyone at the ceremony and have Elsa be trapped by one of Varian's devices.I want the slut princess Anna to be raped in the Coronian plaza as befitting of Corona's traditions. I bet the whore would even like it as Elsa watches her cum. Then I want Elsa to be flayed alive and left to rot on the Coronian wall, as a warning to Corona's enemies. Rapunzel is a Goddess to her people and a Nightmare to her enemies, that is Corona's way.
>>8087187Why do you think you’re going to accomplish anything by posting the same stupid thing over and over again?
>>8087581Because he's mentally disturbed and cannot accept Elsa's superiority.
>>8088832I love that naughty smile
Leg or no legs Ariel?
>>8091241Legs for sure. Follow up: voice or no voice?
>>8091540definitely no voice, women talking kills my boner
>>8091241Her legs give her a nice butt as well, so team legs.>>8091241She has a beautiful singing voice and I’m not big on the idea having a girlfriend/wife that would make need to learn sign language or have her write everything down to understand her.
>>8092301what are you, gay?
>>8092301>>8093174Yeah, before internet made porn common, there was literally an industry where you could call a number and talk to "sexy ladies" who would talk dirty to you for $x.99/minute.
>>8094024Ew, don't put that in your mouth
Anyone know if there’s a white version of that Rui3D Elsa video anywhere? Are bleachedfags capable of editing videos?
>>8094702I am not familiar with this video
>>8097826Very nice
>>8087115>Pincess
>>8098339
>>8099664tch...bratty ice witch...need correction!
>>8100603Hey, it's not Elsa's fault OP can't spell!
>>8091241>>8091540Legs and voiceFollow up: Naked or not naked?
>>8099664OR Disney Girls. Are you retarded, anon? No wonder since you like Elsa compared to our Goddess Rapunzel!
>>8102691Punziebros…I think being up in that tower so long cooked our brain cells…
>>8102691>>8102724You're both faggots.
>>8102691>my point>your headNot surprising for one who is unable to acknowledge Elsa's superiority
>>8104505elsa is mid at best, let's be honest here
>>8105728Elsa seems to stomp all other princesses in terms of number of porn pics, however she herself is stomped by Judy Hopps. Kek
>>8102116Naked, just nakedAriel being naked is perfect.
>>8105728I'm sorry, I speak English, so I don't know what "mid" means. I'm guessing it must mean "best ever", since that would best describe Elsa.>>8106172Yet another sign of the approaching apocalypse.
>>8091241>LegsAriel kickstarted my foot fetish, legs for me
>>8108655Bruh this guy’s dick has some fucking growth coming off the bottom part. That shit ain’t a vein or sweat
>>8110577It's melting! AHHHH!!!
>>8111447It happens sometimes
>>8110286Same
>>8113350That looks uncomfortable
>>8117133
>>8117774Is that her aunt?
Curious of any good smut art of Wish’s original better then the movie concepts like with Asha and Star boy or Magnifico and his evil Queen?
>>8119280I doubt too many people are familiar with those concepts, but then, not too many people remember Wish at this point, either.
>>8120152Don’t blame them, such miss opportunity for all the potential porn on the concepts.
imagine the smell
>>8118855Her mom I think
>>8122446No, that looks more like her free spirit aunt
>>8120152I literally watched it last week and couldn't really tell you much about it
>>8126062It’s a movie we’re the scrapped concepts were more interesting then the movie itself.
>>8121707>>8121813fuck off with your AI garbage motherfucker
>>8126707Seems like you need more AI
>>8128171>having a patreon for ai shitGod, our species really is doomed.
>>8128199
>>8137737Beautiful
>>8127829That looks uncomfortable
>>8127827She looks so happy
>>8141982 I think her way of looking at things probably makes her fun in bed. She's innocent in her outlook (as innocent to "reality" as a girl who has had someone attempt to murder her several times and lives with all that Dwarf smegma. ) She just enjoys fun. Punzie is probably the same. >>8137737 probably with the novelty of both legs AND a Vagina also wants to try a lot of things. I had this Mulan drawn a million years ago.
>>8142049Very nice. I'd like to mount Mulan, if you know what I mean.
>>8142049Mulan is fucking hot
Can I post, uh, Eclipsa Butterfly?
>>8146315She’s a Disney girl so why not.
>>8146230Who is that giving Ariel a spanking?
>>8146315Knock yourself out
Well I guess it was only a matter of time before the flood of hackneyed AI spam hit these threads too. It was nice while it lasted...
>>8150550I much prefer AI over faggots like you who only whine like little bitches without posting any pictures.
>>8150550Yeah it's jank
>>8150550>>8151724it's beautiful art. why do you hate beautiful things? why do you hate beauty? why are you so afraid of technology? those ai pics they posted look amazing. you really can't appreciate beauty be side it came from a computer? do you hate CGI too? do you hate CGI movies? a computer made CGI as well.
>>8151782
>>8151863basically describes this entire place
>>8151192it's just cartoon porn, it's just fucking porn or Disney princesses. I seriously don't understand his mental illness in hating AI, it's just fucking fap material. we are all here for porn. its not that deep
>>8151863people will write a program that takes premade art, dissect it and stitch it back together and called themselves artists and will spit in the eye of the people who made the ingredients to their abomination.Art is not just about the end product, its about the pleasure of making, experimenting, developing, and creating something with your own hands. But you spit in the eye of art you don't understand because you are not cursed the visions and the compelled by the compulsions and motivated by the emotions that drive a true artists to carve marble and paint canvas and etch with charcoal.You are not filled with yearning or existentialism or romanticism, you are not driven by pageantry or poetry. You don't attend art classes or go to museums.All you do is whack off to fake woman, because you have zero appreciation for the real deal.Fucking cope, losers
>>8152043it's porn. it's not some high art. it's fucking porn...it's naked fucking tits.>You are not filled with yearning or existentialism or romanticism, you are not driven by pageantry or poetry. You don't attend art classes or go to museums.oh yeah let's talk about "modern art"yeah like that banana glued to a wall that sold for 1 million dollars. yeahor the woman that paints pictures by putting paint inside her butt and farting it out yeah. that's high fucking art. or how about the guy that paints with a fucking mop in Japan. that's real fucking art modern art is truly pointless and awful. modern art is literally garbage.you are arrogant and you are elitistyou are pretentious. smug. ( typical artist.)it's always sunny in Philadelphia and Portlandia made fun of people like you modern artists are made fun of the greatest thing that could ever happen to the art world was ai. I'm so happy you are mad. I feel legitimate joy at your anger.I'm happy at your anger. this is youhttps://youtu.be/kjS6bQ5OQ-o?si=Jey78ANJOQcYJoU3https://youtu.be/fLzixKZp_a0?si=LG-h_G7TohPMARbyI'm so happy AI art is fucking people like u honey
>>8151782>>8149516>>8149514>>8149509>>8149492>>8149456I personally don’t mind AI art as long as it looks good, but these smiles just creep me out.
>>8152465most Ariel official images have her smiling.
>>8152824They never look weird though. I think it’s just the Dall-E style that makes it look uncanny, I never liked this AI art style wish it stopped being spammed.
Drawfag hereAny requests for Ariel, jasmine or Meg?
>>8153075Ariel naked in an Japanese onsen
>>8153075Ariel walking naked on the beach with Mera from Aquaman as both ladies are holding hands.
>>8153075Ariel getting measured by Meg and Kida.
>>8153075Ariel here in the shower after she strips herself to clean Anna.
>>8153075No Kida?
>>8151192I've been posting dozens of times each in the last five to ten of these threads you cunt. Don't you fuckin start with me. >>8151782They do not look good. It all looks the same, it's all filled with ridiculous errors, and it all lacks any kind of spirit. Hell, at least shit like Cartoon Valley has some value as something to laugh at. >>8152173I love that people come to these subs just to whine about artists. Your dumb niggerrigged AI wouldn't fuckin exist without artists, yet here you are bitching and whining about "elitism" and going off to complain about soulless "modern art" as if it has any fuckin relevance here. Then you go and try to mock people with comedy about art made by artists. Because like every other fuckin AI cocksucker, the ideas of nuance and comedic satire are wasted on you.On some level, I'm kinda glad AI is here now too; because I can't wait to see you all wailing when all that's left is a sea of AI-generated cronenberg'd garbage.
>>8152845I just don't get why it all has to be here. There really needs to be a containment board for this shit.
>>8153075Sample of your work?
>>8153995no. I'm literally replying to someone attacking AI art. I'm REPLYING to someone. I wouldn't have attacked anyone if it wasn't a reply.and I'm not attacking all artists, I love anime, I love western comics. I love regular drawings, I love marvel characters. I have drawn posters on my walls. but my post was also a reply to this >>8151863ai art came into the public at the exact same time that the art world is In a horrible awful state full of pretentious elitists arrogant ASSHOLES that literally shit paint out of their literal butts and sell it for 1 million dollars .modern art galleries lookike trash dumps. I'm not attacking a person that takes a pencil and spends 2 hours drawing a tiger on a forest. but most of the people that hate AI art draw like Napoleon dynamite. every time there's some AI fight on Twitter or Facebook, I go look at their profile, and it's the ugliest modern art shit I've ever seen. literally looks like shit sometimes.I can't take ai criticism seriously from a person that draws with their feet or some pretentious nonsense. >>8154000because it's porn of a princess? because it's naked tits. the op didn't specify about it. next time the op can specify. only hand drawn porn
>>8154000>>8153995>>8152845>>8152465some people will say that if you use Photoshop you are not a real artist. if you don't draw using pencils and markers then you are not a real artist.clicking on a computer mouse to draw is cheating. if you want to go hardcore about it. art should not involve using Photoshop or Adobe products.artists draw by hand. on paper.using Photoshop is just as bad as ai. that's what a lot of people claim. agree?
>>8155142People just love to complain, so better ignore them and keep posting AI
>>8155142I’m not complaining about AI art I even posted a picture of it when it can look really good. >>8152845I just think the DALL-E art style looks like utter shit.
>>8155802I don't wanna get in more drama or problems. I've just noticed that the people that complained about AI are some of the smug arrogant artists I've ever met >>8156018fair enough sorry about that. no worries.
>>8153995>They do not look good. It all looks the same, it's all filled with ridiculous errors, and it all lacks any kind of spirit.It's only has errors if the person who made it is too lazy to fix. They often look good and can be in any artstyle. They don't have to all look the same. picrel.
>>8155136Look, I get that you want to push this narrative of AI being the great equalizer, but the fact is that this is just tacked-on marketing bullshit. It's a tool that exists purely to push human artists out of the market and save corporations money, because they know the general public is too stupid/lazy to care either way. I've encountered as many braindead tech bros suckin off every AI "artist" as you've met pretentious artists. I'm not gonna pretend they aren't out there, because they are, but it's beyond stupid to assert that AI exists as some response to "modern" art (a term you keep throwing around as if it's some monolithic villainous entity) or artistic elitism. Having a machine shit out images for you doesn't make you an artist, so it doesn't really solve that inequality. Imagine if the special olympics said "Instead of having cripples work to overcome their disabilities to compete, we're just gonna let them all have a robot. You still have to tell the robot which events to compete in though, so it's just like being an athlete!" You really think that's equality? >>8155142Strawman strawman strawman. Is that all you have? Describing an image does not make one an artist. That is all AI image generation is. It is not making art. It is nitpicking details as another entity creates imagery for you. At best, you're standing over the artist's shoulder. >>8156544>I've just noticed that the people that complained about AI are some of the smug arrogant artists I've ever metAnd the people that support AI art never stop whining about artists. Funny how that works.
>>8156768And this is where I'm gonna be frank and say that if these people would take the time to actually do this work, they might have a leg to stand on when they try to pass their hackneyed garbage off as "art". But the fact is that the market is so flooded with content right now that there's really no hope. Yes, you have as many styles of AI generated imagery as you have artists to steal styles from. And you have a million images being vomited up for each of them. Maybe ten of those will be passable, and if you're lucky you might even get one that's good.
>>8156806>And this is where I'm gonna be frank and say that if these people would take the time to actually do this work, they might have a leg to stand on when they try to pass their hackneyed garbage off as "art".I get what you're saying, but you can literally say the same about any traditional art. Go to deviantart and browse the art. There's a lot of terrible amateur artists there and a fraction of the artists are actually really good. This is no different. Having said that, a AI "artist" is no more an artist than someone who gives a chef a recipe to cook is considered a chef. It's a different skill set using software to achieve your goal, but those that do it well can stand apart from the hobbyists bashing their keys just to see what comes out.
>>8156830>Go to deviantart and browse the art. There's a lot of terrible amateur artists there and a fraction of the artists are actually really good.Agreed. I would say that, by virtue of being created by humans, it's still art. And despite us being largely on the same page in regards to whether AI image generation and the people behind it count as "art" and "artists", that's more philosophical than I think the discussion here needs to get. The more relevant point is that shit like that sucks just as much when it shows up here as well. The only difference is that, for the most part, those shitty DA artists aren't regurgitating dozens of nearly identical pieces daily then come here and dump it all over like they're turning out a garbage bag. Likewise, those shitty DA artists don't already have multiple threads devoted to their shitty art (which frequently have nothing to do with the CARTOON part of this board, making it baffling as to why it's here) which should at least contain them.
>>8156842True. I post AI gens but I usually take the time to fix hands and wierdness so it looks good, and I'll post that one image I spent an hour on. I don't like to see people spamming the dozen images they churned out from one prompt with all the fucked up things still in it. (or even if they're all fixed, it's still boring to look at what you know is very similar images that all came from the same prompt)There SHOULD be a separate board. AI has exploded and there's no reason why it shouldn't be stuck in it's own board. I've complained myself about the shitty dall-e threads that have been going on for months now in the adult cartoon board, that barely ever contains any cartoons and no adult content. Those fags get off on getting a gen of taylor swift sticking out her tongue now, they've been so cucked by the corporate ai censorship.
>>8157216>I've complained myself about the shitty dall-e threads that have been going on for months now in the adult cartoon board, that barely ever contains any cartoons and no adult content. Yeah see this is the shit I don't get. I mean even if we don't have an AI containment board, that shit at least should go over to somewhere like /s/ or even /hc/. Although even then, the fact that they're weirdly devoid of adult content so much of the time really means they should probably just be foisted off onto /b/.
>>8157216Thing is there are mountains of absolutely garbage MS paint tier disney porn that routinely get posted. Basically everything made prior to like 2012 is atrocious quality. AI slop is better than most of that stuff
>>8157604>AI slop is better than most of that stuffYou say this as if it has to be one or the other, or that there being garbage art of one sort justifies shitting out any garbage art. There's plentiful good, real art out there. Honestly, if the bar is "Better than Windows XP era MS Paint doodles", this whole place is just fucked.
For me personally, I don't mind the AI stuff if it's good, but there's a lot--a LOT--that isn't. The DALL-E stuff is just creepy, for example. And of course there's all the pictures with weird errors like extra fingers that just ruin it.But my main issue with it is when people post it, they can't post just one or two they have to dump a TON. Soon the whole thread is AI and there's no room for the better stuff. That's annoying.
>>8156544>I've just noticed that the people that complained about AI are some of the smug arrogant artists I've ever metThey're afraid and rightfully so because their whiny asses are gonna be replaced by AI. The good artists will survive and may even use AI to improve their craft.Its the law of nature
>>8159270Being replaced by computers is the law of nature?
>>8160496In case of whiny artist bitches, yeah and I'm glad for it!
>>8159270>AI dickwarmer>only ever whines about artistsHow typical. Their behavior is as predictably stupid as the content they worship. Pick up a pencil, you lazy hack.
>>8158571>And of course there's all the pictures with weird errors like extra fingers that just ruin it.yet if i draw a completely horrible piece of shit ariel by hand then its worthy of praise? why?is this drawing perfectly proportioned?thats why i cant take ai haters seriously, all art has imperfections, no one draws perfectly
>>8163093>Pick up a pencil, you lazy hack.so you agree that photoshop digital art is done by fake artists and hacks. if someone uses photoshop to draw, they are a hack
>>8156805>It's a tool that exists purely to push human artists out of the market and save corporations money, because they know the general public is too stupid/lazy to care either way.oh im really glad that you dont use netflix or itunes or spotify, im very happy that you buy cds and dvds, you only buy real media right? youre not a hypocrite right? thank you for supporting cds and dvds>strawmanno, explain to me how clicking a mouse on photoshop makes you an artist. literally explain to me your double standardsif you are mad that a MACHINE creates a drawing in aithen you equally must hate digitally created photoshop art, right? "a machine created it"right?
>>8163351You not understanding the slogan is not the argument you think it is. >>8163366>oh im really glad that you dont use netflix or itunes or spotify, im very happy that you buy cds and dvds, you only buy real media right?>youre not a hypocrite right?I like how you thought this would be such a gotcha, except you actually described my media buying habits. >no, explain to me how clicking a mouse on photoshop makes you an artist. literally explain to me your double standardsIf nothing else, it demands physical coordination. If you're only using photoshop to alter an image using filters and such, that's not art either. But that's hardly the same as digital painting. To keep pointing to photoshop as some "make art for me" machine is beyond disingenuous to the point of being outright retarded. If Photoshop or programs like it simply existed to vomit prompts into and let it spit some abomination back out, then I'd agree that it isn't art. But that's not what it is, and we both know it. Not stop being a stupid faggot and at least try to come up with a real argument beyond "Lazy idiots want all the credit of being an artist without any of the effort."
I love this picture!
She's my Goddess
>>8164367but real art is by hands, right?> Photoshop creates coordination didn't cgi killed practical effects? so you boycott marvel movies right? you boycott all CGI> gotcha momentlet's go through all the problems with AI:> kills jobs so you boycott solar energy and electric cars then. you support clean coal and natural gas. right? electric cars will kill the oil business? > strawman, coal and gas kill the environment.but if I use ai, aren't I saving trees?I don't buy pencils or paper. am I not saving trees? > ai steals from artistsok do you own Ariel? do you own the copyright for Ariel? isn't every single person in here stealing from Disney.kind of retarded to complain about art theft on a board full of plagiarized porn of a Disney™ character...... > so is full of ugly defects and real art doesn't have fuck ups?I literally can't take the AI hate seriously with all this hypocrisy and double standards.
>>8164367Iv made like 10,000 images or so of AIslop and participated in the threads for a long time. It’s very rare to see any AI user on 4chan ask to be called an artist, though, people might be doing that outside of here. Especially the ones that are monetizing. However, I think most or nearly all of the people that are making money off of AI porn are in the “AI-assisted” category still, and they’re at least doing serious editing work on their stuff. Personally, AIslop has gotten me to start learning how to use GIMP. And I will probably try to draw some stuff for real once I get bored of this.
>>8165961>didn't cgi killed practical effects? so you boycott marvel movies right? you boycott all CGIWell actually I do refuse to watch marvel movies, so bad example on your part.The thing you fail to grasp here is that you're comparing different artistic mediums to a program which just shits out imagery. No amount of these stupid comparisons can possibly mean anything, because you're still only ever comparing a medium through which a human creates art to a machine which manufactures content. These are fundamentally different things. >so you boycott solar energy and electric cars then. you support clean coal and natural gas. right? electric cars will kill the oil business?Are you actually this retarded that you can't make one solid argument? Who the fuck is talking about the energy or logging industry here? This isn't about "protecting jobs" as some blanket term. This is about protecting ARTISTS. I couldn't give less of a fuck if some sister-fucking coal miner gets laid off because the next town over decided to switch to wind energy. If you really want to say that's hypocritical then fine, but it doesn't mean anything because at that point EVERYONE is a hypocrite; nobody out there could possibly care about saving all jobs. >ok do you own Ariel? do you own the copyright for Ariel? isn't every single person in here stealing from Disney."Disney" is not an artist. They employ artists, who themselves have no ownership of the art they produce. There is no indication that independent artists working under the protection of the First Amendment to produce artwork, erotic or otherwise, has any impact on Disney's profits. Indeed, it is far more likely that these artists indirectly contribute to Disney's profits by maintaining awareness of otherwise forgotten media. Any decisions which Disney makes that negatively impact their artistic staff is on Disney.
>>8165961>and real art doesn't have fuck ups?At the level AI is trying to emulate; not really, no. If a real "artist" was making the kind of Lovecraftian monstrosities AI shits out without it being intentional, I would be deeply concerned for their health. I'd suspect they might have a large tumor pressing on their brain, or might have suffered a severe blow to the head. Because unlike AI, a human should be able to recognize how many fucking fingers another human is meant to have. >I literally can't take the AI hate seriously with all this hypocrisy and double standards.You literally can't make a single argument to support it either, so... I don't know what to tell ya. >>8166438>people might be doing that outside of here.No, there is no "might". They are. >I think most or nearly all of the people that are making money off of AI porn are in the “AI-assisted” category still, Some may. Some don't. At absolute best it's a massive crutch, and what little editing they're doing hardly makes them "artists". It's more akin to tracing than anything else. >Personally, AIslop has gotten me to start learning how to use GIMP. And I will probably try to draw some stuff for real once I get bored of this.That is the best possible outcome of this whole disaster. Unfortunately, as a system which exists at its core purely to cater to laziness and greed, I suspect that the vast majority of AI users have no interest in actually improving themselves and are rather content to just keep pumping out the same dreck. Like any tool, some percentage of users will bend the intent and make something useful of it. But it is not a tool which lends itself to making art or artists any better.
>>8165159Creepy...
>>8166746It's so rare to find good Cinderella art
>>8169040It really is. Unfortunately that's about all I've got. Or at least all I've got that can be posted to /aco/. Shame either way. Same goes for Aurora.
>>8169040>>8170154why isn't she more popular? she's a classic aryan beauty
>>8171754Lack of agency, people remember active heroines more.
>>8171754She was barely a character in her own movie even when she’s not asleep for half of it.
>>8166705>. I couldn't give less of a fuck if some sister-fucking coal miner gets laid off because the next town over decided to switch to wind energy. If you really want to say that's hypocritical then fine, but it doesn't mean anything because at that point EVERYONE is a hypocrite; >nobody out there could possibly care about saving all jobs.then why should people care about you losing your art job?seriously, why would anyone give a shit that you can't get paid to draw something?that's exactly the bullshit artist mentality I'm talking about - who gives a shit if taxi drivers lose their job to Uber- who gives a shit if blockbuster closed because of Netflix- who gives a shit if Walmart and McDonald's employees lose their job to self check out machines >I ONLY CARE ABOUT AI BECAUSE IM LOSING MY JOB AAAAHHHHH exactly. artists do not give a shit if coal miners lose their job to electric cars. exactly so why the duck should anyone care that you can't draw for money how was it that journalists said it about coal miners?learn to code?>Disney" is not an artist. They employ artists, who themselves have no ownership of the art they produceno, no no. that's not the question, are you stealing Disney copyright content to draw porn with it? are you taking someone else's drawing and creating an obscene pornographic picture? isn't that stealing. by YOUR definition?
>>8166738>You literally can't make a single argument to support it either, so... I don't know what to tell ya.ai creates beautiful images, they look very beautiful sometimes. some AI pics are gorgeous looking ai helps people be more creative and ai helps people create their ideas. ai helps everyone to create whatever they want. so is easy to use and doesn't require a lot of learning like Photoshop, anyone young or old can use it. kids or Grandpas can create art. it's easy. it's simple. >AI is not real artwell I see a drawing. I see a cartoon. if AI is not real art then Photoshop pics are not real art. a computer made it. ( different mediums but all created by computers. CGI. Photoshop. ai= computers) > ai steals from artists but everyone steals from each other? this entire fucking thread is stolen Disney art. come on. come on ...........
>>8172277This one's not so bad
>>8172263>seriously, why would anyone give a shit that you can't get paid to draw something?Because art is foundational to society. And before you start with this shit again: This isn't about porn. This is about art as a broad concept. The taxi driver doesn't make his car. The blockbuster clerk doesn't make the movies. The cashier doesn't make the products they check out. You are, once again, equating fundamentally different things in an absolutely ridiculous effort to salvage some kind of point. AI generated imagery does not improve society. It does not make the world cleaner. Not all jobs are equal, and the destruction of certain jobs is necessary for society to advance. At no point in human history have artists been expendable. Even in the most quixotically utilitarian societies, artists had a place. Now fair enough, if all you intend to do is shit out propaganda posters then I'm sure AI could do fine for you. But I have to assume that, retarded as you are, such a society isn't what you're hoping for the world to head towards. >are you stealing Disney copyright content to draw porn with it?No. The First Amendment protects parody work. This is what allows artists to produce this manner of work without threat of legal repercussions. Thus far, no precedent has been established protecting AI generated content from the artists from which it steals material. Given that the US Copyright Office does not extend copyright protection to AI content, I'd wager that it's not looking great for AI content mills.
>>8172274>so is easy to use and doesn't require a lot of learning like Photoshop, anyone young or old can use it. kids or Grandpas can create art. it's easy. it's simple.Good. I'm glad. It'd be nice if we could just let them have that and keep it out of the hands of those who would use it only to destroy one of the oldest professions of humanity for the sake of greed and laziness. Except we can't, because greed and laziness is the whole market for it as far as the movement of money is concerned. >if AI is not real art then Photoshop pics are not real art.>a computer made it. ( different mediums but all created by computers. CGI. Photoshop. ai= computers)No, again; you're mixing up an artistic medium with a machine that manufactures images. There is a difference between "I made this using a computer" and "A computer made this". Saying they're the same is like saying a TV dinner and a michelan-starred meal are the same simply because they were both created using electricity. Could you argue that cooking over a flame has more culniary merit? Sure. But it's still a false equivalence. >but everyone steals from each other?>this entire fucking thread is stolen Disney art. come on. come on ...........See here >>8173404There is a very clear difference between what we see here, and what AI image generation relies on to produce content.
>>8173404>It does not make the world cleaner. Not all jobs are equal, and the destruction of certain jobs is necessary for society to advance. At no point in human history have artists been expendable. Even in the most quixotically utilitarian societies, artists had a place The kind of point you're making here is exactly why a lot of people are applauding the prospect of artists losing their livelihood. You patently don't care about technology destroying OTHER people's ways of life and jobs, but now that technology is coming for you it is supposed to some kind of moral catastrophe. Fact is, AI being able to supplant artists in some or many ways is not different than technological progress streamlining, standardizing, automating, and rationalizing other people's jobs out of existence. Artfags mad about this are essentially calling for themselves and their professional compatriots to be recognized as a kind of priestly caste that must be insulated from the effects of technology. That makes perfect sense in terms of rational self-interest, but it you have to realize that technology has already swept over and fundamentally transformed the economic life of everyone else in society. Now it's coming for artists, just a completely logical extrapolation from past trends
>>8173540So clearly you either didn't bother to read or couldn't grasp the whole second part of that point. In the context of human history and society, the simple fact is that art is different. Art is not something that can be looked at through the same lens as manufactured goods. While events like the industrial revolution doubtless had a massive impact on the nature of art, the fact is that even then art and artists remained. You cannot streamline, standardize, automate, or rationalize the creative process. To do so is antithetical to the concept of "art" in any sense. Aside from anything else, there's a line between "fundamentally transforming" and "annihilating". You've been making the same stupid fucking points over and over again. Literally all you can do is talk about how the march of "progress" is something that impacts other aspects of life, as if that's either relevant here, or somehow justifies what's happening. We are discussing art. We are discussing an aspect of humanity that goes deeper than nearly any other that can still be practiced in the 21st century as a profession. It is so fundamentally tied to our being that pointing to jobs like "blockbuster clerk" as an equivalent makes it abundantly clear how little you grasp the concepts here. This isn't an "artists are better than you" thing. This is a "You're a fucking moron who clearly has no comprehension of the value of art to society, but is so very happy to surrender it all for the sake of saving major corporations and lazy faggots some minor effort and expense." It is a tool made by and for those too spiteful, lazy, and greedy to make art. That. Is. It.
>>8151782It's not art at all. In many ways it's the opposite of art.
>>8174260I wouldn't even bother. If the multiple walls of text haven't been a clear enough indication, these AI dick-riding faggots can't be reasoned with; their entirely motivated by spite, so there's literally no way to have a good-faith discussion with them.
Which Princess is the most naive?
Keeping the blood pure! For an Aryan Corona!
>>8177975If we're counting the TV series, it's definitely Rapunzel. The way she keeps letting criminals walk free, because she thinks she sees the "good" in them. If it were anything other than a Disney cartoon, one of them would have killed her by now.People think that because she can beat a lizard at chess, she must be some kind of genius, but the truth is, she's not very bright.
>>8175206>>8175863The duality of (wo)man
>>8179097So pure his cock is growing out of his thigh.
I noticed a surprising lack of good mulan content around
>>8182972Another underappreciated princess for sure. Honestly all of the renaissance era girls need more love (both figuratively, and literally).
>>8183855Mulan is the best Disney girl
>>8182972>>8183851Someone draw her getting a Nuru massage from Ariel.
