Previously: >>8295085 The cartoony side: >>8304953 No DALL-E stuff.>GuidesGeneral: github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki | rentry.org/sdg-link | rentry.org/rentrysdHires Fix: rentry.org/hiresfixjan23Inpainting/Outpainting: rentry.org/drfar | rentry.org/inpainting-guide-SDAnimation: rentry.org/AnimAnonCreate LoRAs, TIs: rentry.org/59xed3 | rentry.org/simplified-embed-trainingList of models/LoRAs:rentry.org/acorepo>Auto1111 extensionsControlNet: github.com/Mikubill/sd-webui-controlnet | rentry.org/dummycontrolnetRegional Prompter: github.com/hako-mikan/sd-webui-regional-prompterTag autocomplete: github.com/DominikDoom/a1111-sd-webui-tagcomplete>Related>>>/h/hdg>>>/e/edg>>>/d/ddg>>>/g/sdg>>>/trash/sdg>>>/vg/aids>>>/vt/vtai
Slowly getting into zonkey/pony prompting
>>8315060Make some hairy Sadie Sink please.
>>8315074
>>8315124
>>8315128
>>8315134
>>8315138
>>8315230
>>8315138Where do I get Zonkey?
>>8315236>>8315408on civitai: Zonkey Realismthere you also find images at the bottom of the page, most of which show the prompts and settings usedzonkey needs a bit of setup and is a bit more vram hungry than other checkpoints
>>8315419
>>8315421
>>8315425
>>8315431
>>8315419Can't find it. Might have been removed. Shit. Awesome pics btw.
>>8315834https://civitai.com/models/405136/zonkey-.realism(pic not related)
>>8315876FUCK YEAH BROTHER! I have tried everything in the search. I even wanted to type Z (kek) and go down the list. Nice. Thanks.
did the dalle3-lora emma watson poster ever make more like these?
>>8315928I did the lora but not these images. Pretty great to see tho. new version going up late tomorrow night under a secret name that wont get taken down after 100 downloads
>>8316081did you put up sexual images for the lora on civitai?
>>8315431>>8315074>>8315124catbox for these three? I keep trying to get the girls off the ground (tied arms up, dangling feet) but I just can't get there
>>8316408The feet up is basically "legs up,feet tied to ceiling,shot from below" and some luck. Most gens were not like that and I wasn't going for it anyways.Case in point since the other two have the same exact prompt. Also "arms tied behind back" or "arms tied".DPM++2M SDE, CLIP skip 2 and 30 steps.Negative "score_6, score_5, score_4, pony, censored, furry, child" and the positive starts with "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, cinematic lighting, realistic, hyperdetailed masterpiece,1girl blonde woman"catbox sometime later
>>8316551and CFG is 4
>>8316081Thanks!waiting patiently for the loras emma anon.Any chance for the old ones in a mega while we wait for new?
Am I the only one who, after trying realistic pony models for a while, can't go back to 1.5 or xl models?It is so easy to create scenes as you want with the pony models, just by putting the tags the model recognizes it perfectly.And that's why it makes me so disgusted to have to go back to 1.5 or xl models, because of how difficult it is to create scenes with their very long prompts, having to use several loras to create a scene or sexual position, that it's impossible for me to think about going back to 1.5 or xl models.The realistic pony models are not at the same level as the XL or 1.5, in that we agree, with much more time and effort you get a better quality in XL or 1.5, but taking into account that only 3-4 months ago that have become popular I think it is advancing at a giant step.I still think that the realistic pony models lack a bit of quality in the lighting and the details of the skin, I understand that it is because they are not designed for realism and are very trained in anime, but I prefer that, and wait for it to improve, than having to relearn the thousand things needed to get a good photo in 1.5 and xl.Still, I don't know if there is any project that is entering a realistic XL model with the tags like pony does, because for example, I would like to use the face id plus v2, but at the moment the lora is not compatible with pony, a juggernaut/dreamshaper xL with the same style of creating images of pony (using tags, without so many loras), would be the best.What do you think?
>>8316719Use whatever makes your life easier/gives what you want, everybody and everthing else can go pound sand.
bumping for moar jenna
What samplers/prompts are u using with zonkey?
>>8316719i'm torn, because i vastly prefer the aesthetic of the realistic models and the added eroticism of me being able to add my fetishes doesn't counterbalance my preference for the realism. Zonkey being an absolute pain in the ass with OOMs doesn't help matters.>>8317087just pull from civit the real open question is how best to upscale
there's a tendency to think that if your gen was just hi-def enough, or had some extra little bit of je ne sais quoi, you would spontaneously nut, and you know what, that's not too far off
but like, yeah, congratulations, you made some coom shit. what next? I feel like with pony, the only way forward is degeneracy, whereas at least with realisic models, you can do some other shit with them
>>8316191No they were face closeups. Im not sure if some cuck reported me or what because the only way they could be sexual is via prompting. They were essentially a character/style lora>>8316716I just dont have pc access rn, the first one going up will be my latest.Also does anyone have like 20 good dalle gens of emilia clarke at different angles and lightings/ eyes open and closed? Looking to train one for her
>>8317177Start from pony and merge/finetune. If you want the max SDXL realism quality, you can use refiner at .8 with a epicrealism level model, but have your base model be ponyrealism. Ive used controlnet softedge to influence the setting and such, i.e. emma in the trunk of a car worked much better with controlnet
After several months using the realistic pony models and seeing that one of my biggest complaints was that the images came out with too much brightness and contrast, I just realized that it is quite solved by lowering the CFG scale (I was used to use 7 in 1.5).xd
>>8317489So good>>8317516I feel like I can hear the skin against that floatie lolAny recommendations on what to do with pics after generation to make them look more amateur? So far I've tried upping the white balance, smoothing texture, and trying to adjust curves.Real amateur pics outside of OF just has this certain level of jank I can't achieve due to how clean the lighting is in SD even with LoRAs.Also coherent txt2vid soon pls.
having a skill issue finding the middle ground on face loras and facial expressions, it's all or nothing
>>8317227zonkey+refiner. Why didn't I think of that.See pic for a comparison. zonkey has a bit of that unnatural texture (even with DPM++ 2M SDE and CLIP skip 2 it doesn't fully disappear at 30 steps).Running cyberrealisticPony as the refiner clears that right up. The hard lighting remains. cyberrealisticPony doesn't prompt as well as zonkey, so I'm not using that in the first place.Running cyberrealisticXL as the refiner fishes the harsh lighting (it's a non-pony model). juggernaut and irisLux are the same, but look a bit worse.Fucking wow. It's all the zonkey without looking zonkey...
>>8317516catbox this girl pls
>>8315074Instead of slowly getting into it, please quickly get out of itYou're dogshit
>>8317737>rrealisticPony as the refiner clears that right up. The hard lighting remaiwhat sampler/cfg scale are u using on zonkey?in my testing, dpm++ 3m sde have good results, but i dont like this sampler
>>8317762Post your gens for comparison great masterThey were not bad for a first try. You are just wrongI didn't even run adetailer on the face her
>>8317812What I mentioned there, and CFG 4. Copied those from some civitai image. I'll try 3m SDE
>>8315074Image redone with better face and crPony refiner as mentioned here >>8317737On closer inspection, a non-pony refiner can butcher the lewd details noticeably. So I'll live with the harsh lighting for now.>>8317762Better now?
I would like to try zonkey, but I have seen that it works differently from conventional pony models, I think it does not use the Score and uses a prompt of "real life" or something like that I have understood, for the theme of shadows and lights that you recommend, what I have seen most has been "dim light, dramatic shadows", any other recommendation, is there any prompt that improves the quality of the skin?
>>8317854I think you need both, since it's a merge. Leave out the score and you get crap. But you need some realistic elements in the prompt too.Try it with a refiner as was just explained here, works wonders >>8317737>>8317845even better face (god that stupid angle)
>>8317854>>8317737My go to has been ponyRealismv7 checkpoint, but i am reliant on loras for realism. This one plays well with everclearPNY at 1.0 weight and with ponyrealism at 0.6 weight.https://civitai.com/models/119667/sdxl-william-eggleston-style
>>8316408https://litter.catbox.moe/bi6if3.pnghttps://litter.catbox.moe/ddd61s.pnghttps://litter.catbox.moe/v7pwsm.pngFirst image with refiner and fixed face:https://litter.catbox.moe/ufkk9n.png
>>8317216pixiv will automatically search through your metadata for celeb names so i'd imagine civit would eventually do the same. i got hit for Mila Kunis in the early days>>8317227i'm not merging shit lol this is degenerate enough as is without spending even more time on it>>8317283yea xl needs lower CFG,idk why the slider even goes up to 30 when 99.9 percent of the time you need between 1 and 7>>8317568real photos have a jank to it that SD averages can't achieve. you can look at this and be like "damn i wish that were upscaled" but when you see an upscaled version, then what? is some curiosity satisfied? do you spontaneously nut? what is the point of any of this?
>>8318157It’s definitely a just a curiosity satisfied, even when using 3D modelers and things like that I always challenge myself and see just how believable I can make an image or piece of work… like if I saw it without any context that it was an AI photo that I’d believe it. It’s just one of those things where either way you go, whether it be upscaling the photo for fidelity or purposefully adding noise and artifacts, that there’s always going to be that sort of “look” to it that is so hard to shake. It’s just a fun game and time waster to me.
>>8317568Fun idea: try running the image through img2img with "amateur" in the prompt.The clip interrogator can identify an image as amateur. That means it man also generate an image to look that way (whatever that exactly may entail).
>>8318027thanks!
>>8317737Cool! What percentage are you setting the refiner at for your samples?
>>8318209It reminds me of the photoshop fake days. If you wanted to make something look really "real", you had to add fake jpeg noise to the shooped head. If the base shot has crappy artifacts, your brain expects so see those in the face as well.Now we have new problems. I'm suspecting that some issues people are having with XL is bad prompting and AI being too sneaky. For example, Fooocus puts "noise" in the negative prompt in its style. Guess what, noise can be needed to make an image look good. And something can be mistaken for noise that is then filtered out and hurts the final image, like hair fuzz or skin pores.And they also put "ugly" in the negative. Guess what's tagged ugly in the dataset: skin imperfections, out-of-symmetry appearances, blemishes, untidy makeup. All things that make something look real.
>>83183150.8 like anon suggested, which is also the default value in A1111 and Fooocus and probably good for technical reasons.
>>8317216you can search on desuarchive heres a search just for emiliahttps://desuarchive.org/aco/search/text/emilia/page/1and one for Daeneryshttps://desuarchive.org/aco/search/text/daenerys/page/1/You should have plenty to choose from.Otherwise I'll post some of her shortly.Looking forward to your new model.
>>8318353did you inpaint the hand? it made a little hand-in-hand and arm in there
>>8318372uh bruh its fine da vaselino filter makez it gud dun fosus on detayzz
>>8315575prompts?
>>8318372oops lol no i've been fucking around with 1.5 and tile upscale>>8318380>nogen
drawfags are mad tonight lol
>>8318576>tardgen
>>8318331Yea true i was hoping to avoid the sifting lol. Ik there were some people who made a ton of emilias and used to catbox all the time. Looking back at all those early dalle threads is depressing tho. It was fun
i dont even see images anymore. just see potential
>>8318445it's a 3d render that I img2img with realismengineXL>raw high-resolution extremely-detailed real natural gritty atmospheric closeup candid amateur iphone photo, terrified crying weeping sweaty dirty naked 30 year old Caucasian woman wearing torn medieval dress, natural large saggy breasts, natural nipple, auburn hair, being grabbed by several medieval warrior men, medieval warrior men tearing off woman dress, on a medieval city street, natural light, harsh afternoon sunlight, skin details, natural skin, imperfections, foggy, moody, hazy lighting, shot with iphone, natural detailed face, ugly, gritty, grimy, intense, visceral, bad photo
>>8318323That’s so funny because that reminds me exactly of what it was like lol
the last thing you see before the probe goes in
>>8318592Source of the said salt farm?
Made in SD
>>8319381
>>8319387Do you have the lora link for this pose?
>>8319477More?
>>8319565that was just prompt, no lora involved
>>8319025Prefer the "you found too late it´s an infiltrator".
sdxl too blurry
>>8319917had some good results with setting adetailer to run over the skin by setting the detection model to person and marking "use separate checkpoint" with a good SD1.5 one in there (and a prompt like highly detailed skin bla bla)You'd think this wouldn't work since the resolution of 1.5 is lower but it actually does a good jobMakes me question XL more and more. The higher resolution is not worth much if the details get blurred out
>>8320016WOW incredible realistic JennaOrtega. Can you do ScarJor or EmiliaClarke??
>>8320030NTA but I have some emilias lying around from a test
>>8320075
>>8320079
>>8320083
>>8320089
>>8320092
>>8320102
>>8319609
>>8320075>>8320079>>8320083>>8320089>>8320092>>8320102>>8320103SURREAL REALISTIC bravo anon, incredible work.
>>8320272bonus content then
>>8320375
>>8320375>>8320380Any nudes or with man?
>>8317845>>8317861Still ass face
>>8320455Yeah maybe. But I can make hundreds more similar images without lifting a finger. And I'll keep making them and they will get better as I learn.
>>8320412No men. But I want to run some tests of light, poses and facial expressions and might as well do it with her at the (nudist) beachNevermind any garbled hands or toes since I'm only running adetailer on the face for this
>>8320586
>>8320588
>>8320589
>>8320590
>>8320592
>>8320606
>>8320617
Why is this thread on a cartoon board?
>>8321220because it's adult and there is a cartoon companion threadthe celebs would fit in more on /tv/ or /hr/, but /tv/ doesn't fit the adult theme and /hr/ requires higher resolution images than the default gens provide
>>8315060QQ anyone here uses NAI and has a referral to give, please?
>>8321253The cartoon/sdg thread has gens of cartoon girls.When I think of a cartoon companion thread, I imagine an irl gens of cartoon girlsbut this thread contains random girls. Is /aco/ the best board for a thread like this?
>>8321398the cartoon thread has randos tooit's not perfect but what the hellthere's also the dall-e threadit's much faster moving and most of it not even adult
>>8318818thx
>>8316704>>8316706>>8316706amazing, thank you
>>8321398you are not discouraged from posting your gensif you can make more of these and post them, they belong heremake it your thread, don't try to change other people's posting habits with words
>>8321398I agree but there is no where better for it currently. DESU at this point I think we need a dedicated AI board
DallE LORA uploaded. No keywords, makes good Emmas.>https://civitai.com/models/522298?modelVersionId=580296
>>8322157Disgusting.
>>8322113>>8322157Sweet! Thanks mate gonna grab it now
>>8322157
>>8322271
>>8322275>>8322164get gud
>>8322113is the lora made to create emma? I have tried it and I like the shadows effect it adds from 0.3-0.7, but it also modifies the face a little bit making it look like emma, right?
>>8322474yes it was only trained on emma pics
Woow Love that Emmas! Im looking for more! Could anyone know where i could find?
I'm still testing with zonkey, it's a bit more complex to use than other models, because of the hires. fix, the promts without scores, having to use the refiner to get better effects, and the adetailer, but of all I've tried is the one that gets better shadows and lighting, the other models are very good (ponyrealism, fennfoto and novareality are my favorites), but are still very "bright" and have little shadows, or are very difficult to achieve, this photo is using what I learned, with a hires.fix of 1.4 and adetailer, what do you think?
>>8322704For reference, this is the same prompt, only using Fennfoto, another of my favorite models, as you can see the shadows and lighting changes a lot and that's what I mean by "bright" (I didn't use adetailer this time, I just wanted to show the lighting and shadows),
>>8322113sneaky! let's hope no one snitches this time
wow dalle3 is over, now zonkey is my best friend.
>>8322113>DALL-E LoRAJust use dramatic angle and extreme angle shot in the prompt.>>8322704>>8322735Yes, seeing it. The first one is a more interesting image.
>>8322704pretty gudso the upscale factor is 1.4 and you just set Latent upscale or is there something else to recommend?The first time I tried using upscaling it ate all my VRAM and crashed my system so I'm a bit hesitant to experiment myself
>>8323109incredible , 10 years from now you cant tell real pics from fake.
>>832311510 years from now, we are going to have videos
I had kind of a crazy idea I call it Friezafication. Orginally it was just bdsm pictures of Frieza but I thought it was hotter if this was actually Frieza's original story. He is a normal person who gets transformed into Frieza.The helmet is a brainwashing device to turn him into an insatiable cocksucker. The tail is a giant robotic dildo, his crotch is just an ambiguous mound because it's just latex or armor over a chastity cage. etc. Somebody created Frieza and then unleashed him onto the universe. And it's no wonder he's so pissed off and also so gay.
>>8323138
>>8323142eventually his skin turns white from whatever they're feeding him, and the seems on his helmet and restraints start to fade and just blend into his skin
>>8322113Thank you, you show the way working with dalle images, don't stop with emma
>>8323144until one day eventually he wakes up and he's free to leave. his captor is gone. the fucking machine he was strapped to is gone, and he needs to seek out into the universe for some cock to crave his insatiable appetite.
>>8323138>>8323142>>8323144>>8323151cool stuffmeant as someone for inspiration to try make a realistic version or did you post in the wrong thread?
>>8323138>>8323142>>8323144>>8323151>>>/d/
>>8317605try to make the base with a lower face weight until you get the expressionit will then have lower likeness of courseset adetailer to inpaint the face with the face lora at higher weight to get the likeness backif the denoising strength is low enough, the facial expression will be retained
>>8323022im using the ESRGAN_4x with 0 steps,I have tried several steps, but I don't notice much difference. i have 8gb vram and with forge i dont have any problems with vram
>>8323115thanks, really getting the hang of zonkey, mostly by just stealing a bunch of danbooru tags...
>>8323199I just love the images of veiled Muslim women. It's so beautiful!So, I don't know if you could give some pointers. Prompt, model, loras, etc...
>>8323222deepboru interrogate of any existing images (drawn or photos) is really helpful to learn tags too
>>8322271>>8322275>>8322113thank you, can you make loras with orhers celebs? zendaya, scarjo, taytay, miley, aguilera with dall-e images?
>>8323223I use autismMix to create a base image to work with, then I use it with pyracanny or image prompt on fooocus with Pony Realism then inpaint details, lora isnt needed usually
>>8323215Thanks, I tried that and 1.75 upscale to 1792x1792 works at least, with VRAM to spareI have 12GB but the AMD driver is apparently really bad at dividing the memory between system and SD
>>8323250EMILIA CLARKE ??
there's some gens in here with obvious underage girlsremember that this is a realistic threadmaybe we should link to /b/ AI DEGENerated in the opthose will fit right in there
>>8323223that is the workflow I started with as well, but manual inpainting gets boring real fastfortunately you can automate the process with adetailerthat's if you can't prompt or lora/embedding generate the required look in the first placemight be hard to combine with naked/lewdness, and loras bring their own issuesbut I bet it's real easy to just prompt for a consistent hair style that has the size and color of a veilset adetailer to detect face + dilate mask (or try a head detection model that includes hair)inpaint prompt headscarf with appropriate denoising (can even be done with a different checkpoint, can mix SD1.5/XL/pony in one gen) and maybe headscarf loraand presto. a perfect image every time at the push of a button
>>8315060am I degenerate enough, boys?
>>8323222Can you get longer pussy hair?
>>8323215if you leave the upscaler steps at 0, it uses the same number of sampling steps as the normal genYou can set this to a lower number to speed up the process
>>8323594sort of.
>>8323721Not bad, can you get it consistently? Or did it come with the 40 year old MILF porn star body?
>>8323813excessive_pubic_hair gives pretty consistent results no matter how much weight. no 70s bushes for me.
>>8323843>that>excessiveLMFAO let me guess, tags from a pedo site?
>>8323222>>8323435nice one, guy. you found the sweep spot for genning. it looks good face looks good.
>>8323853danbooru tags, so I guess.
>>8323858You don't want that, I just looked at the list of tags and it has practically nothing relevant.
i tell I lie, a weight of 4.2 in A1111 gets you a proper bush.
>>8323889This looks like when people who never saw a pussy started making Skyrim skins.
>>8323889oops, pre-inpainting. >>8323886ah, I'm not really familiar with danbooru. I'll look for something better.
>>8323211good idea, that’s almost what I’ve been doing except I didnt change the adetailer prompt to a higher strength lora. I’m going to be building a new rig soon, so I should also be able to upscale/inpaint much more quickly.
>>8323957that's the way to go>>8323989saved>>8323993pretty good
I got deported here from /g/ despite censoring.Here are some catboxes I posted at request, seems better than spamming the thread.https://files.catbox.moe/nzoch8.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/1n7hnu.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/g4pve0.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/4sad5m.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/08n5qt.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/zd4ozs.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/i44onf.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/vpf5xn.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/h6zf94.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/e0pble.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/i23ss0.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/rjj2i5.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/1semc0.pngSomeone please tell me why realesrgan_x4plus upscale doesn't actually work and eats the original image but produces nothing ever when I enable upscaling in metastable, even though it is their recommended upscale module.More details on the problem here.>>>/g/101040207
>>8323271>>8323468Ok nice, thank you a lot ! =)
>>8323897How long does inpainting a small part like that take for you compared to generating an entire image? I have a shitty PC so it would take me less time and effort if I just shooped a good looking pussy from a porn pic.
>>8324265
Redoing paintings with img2img can produce good results
Another one.
>>8324337
>>8324344>>8324357Do you use an autotagger on the source image for the img2img or something? Whenever I img2img it generates a totally new image with some similarities but different positions and stuff
>>8324516
>>8324529
>>8324519NTA but lower your denoising strength
>>8324519So I use img2img mode.- Model: RealVis XL 3.0.And in my prompt, I put: Realistic analog amateur photography posted to facebook, Fujifilm XT3, Canon R5. Realistic, photorealistic.I often add a few details of the image in the prompt to make it easier (Girls, happy, naked, etc.).I also put a negative prompt: EasyNegative, anime, cartoon, 2d, 3d cgi, bad anatomy, clothes, bikini, dress, polydactilyI use the sampler: DPM ++ 2m karras.Yes, I use an adetailer: face_yolov8s.pt
>>8323155>>8323168i specifically put it in his thread on this board.theyre made in stable diffusion so this is the right thread and they arent anime style, theyre western style so its aco not d. not sure what is difficult to understand about that.
>>8324600but we are the realistic SD threadthere is a separate cartoon SD threadwhat is difficult to understand about that
>>8324621/d/ is for eastern art and full of gay pedos/e/ is for eastern art and full of pedos/h/ is for eastern art and full of pedos/p/ is for actual photos/hr/ is probably the actual right place for a realistic/photographic thread/aco/ is for western art related to /co/ and /tg/ and is the right place for threads of stuff like >>8324265there is no faggot/futa western art board which is a FUCKING mistakephotofags/realismfags should go to /hr/ and start up a colony therethe deranged repulsive fag you replied to should unironically start a general on /lgbt/, I'm sure those screechy twitter pedos will cry about AI but will be outweighed by the other coomer faggotsI wish faggots just wouldn't fucking come to /aco/, it was such a good board back when especially the futafags were over in /aco/
>>8324650this thread here is not what's shitting up your board thoughthat's the dalle thread
>>8324684I'm not complaining about this thread though, or that one, I'm just talking about what each board is actually for.What's shitting up /aco/ is trapfags.
doing a lot of face experiments - I suppose now I know a lot of ways NOT to make a lightbulb
and the damn freckle clumps keep popping up
speaking of this being a cartoon board, I messed around with 2.5d for like five minutes... drawn styles are definitely easy mode
>>8323119rather 1 to 2 years
>>8315060damn, this shit looks like renders
>>8325311If you add a head that's this clear, you gotta get rid of the zonkey grit everywhereTry cyberrealisticPony as a refiner at 0.8>>8325248In this one it's barely noticeable
>>8325672FUCKING HELL MAN , anon this is scary how realistic it is. bravo. Can you do it with Emilia Clarke or ScarJo?
>>8325723>Can you do it with Emilia Clarke or ScarJo?Not at the moment; what you're seeing is the result of a LORA that was hammered together in my trusty forge over the course of several millenia.
>>8324784if you are having weird troubles, try simplifying your promptthe AI works by association. seemingly unrelated terms can affect the outcome in unexpected waysfor example, prompting brown eyes changes the whole face and body since those are associated with different ethnicitythere is probably something hostile to ginger/freckle types in your prompt (positive or negative) without you realizing itI wish there were a tool to find these hidden interactions
>>8325978make sure to kick out "ugly" from any of your negativesit's the opposite of beautiful, which is associated with clean skin, airbrushed fashion photography glamor crap
>>8325738>course of several milleniaSpend couple of millenia on EmiliaC and ScarJo because anon that head of JennaOrtega is incredible, fucking spooky realistic
>>8326097Very nice pic.
>>8324322>inpaintingthe area you're inpainting doesn't matter, as it is done at the resolution settings you put in, so a smaller selection will be processed at a higher resolution and get more detail. generally takes me about 30 seconds each time with a 6700xt using SDXL, but varies with model, steps, resolution. Unless you're a master at photoshop, you're not going to be quicker. I used a 1050ti with SD1.5, generation times were about a minute.
>>83261866700xt here toonot to mention that if your denoising strength and padding is set right, it automatically matches the light and camera angle to whatever is neededand if you are not happy with the result, let it make a batch of 10 and grab a coffeeit's literally automated photoshopping
>>8326199>6700xt here toopain
anons, would you consider this gen blurry?
>>8326343pretty high detail for a latex doll
>>8326343>>8326358oofhow about this one (ignore the vacuum face)
>>8326343cute face, but the skin...
>>8326441
>>8326460>>8326472I see your point anonhow about this one
>>8326484this one is oddly perfect, just run adetailer on the face and/or eyes
>>8326484>>8326491thanks for the feedback anonturns out the workflow I use for 2D was backfiring big time for 3D
>>8326512now her face looks a bit rubbery againbut there is actual skin detailthese are all not bad looking by the way, just different looks/styles
>>8325700
the thread has been so milquetoast mid that I had to step in.
>>8326720>>8326748cool. looks almost too clean hehbut head and body are a perfect match>>8326774you sat on these for almost a week, what a welcome gap filler>>8326785hot as hell, is there a keyword for choking/throat grabbing?
AOC back in the community college/bartender days
>>8318592U mad tho
>>8320272What are you smoking those are all dogshit
>>8323591Not even remotely, we need to go deeper
>>8327085POST BETTER THEN????
>>8326960>>8326963>>8326964>>8326967>>8326973>>8326977Dollar store knockoff AOC
ignore dismissive nogen comments, we all know who's behind those
>>8327103I'm waiting for a guide on how to set things up
>>8327117pathetic
>>8327114Biden stfu and go back to being charged for felony gun possession
every AI thread has a resident shitterin here, the cartoon thread and even in dalle (take yer meds...)I wonder if it's the same guy actually
>>8326929I was banned :(I use "choking" + subject + weight, (too much of a weight and you get anomalies, invisible hands etc.)
>>8326781good fucking lord
>>8326790holy
>>8326781You got a discord? Take commissions?
>>8327119Retard
>>8327192Finally a good post
>>8327153thanksoverdoing it with the weights is a universal truthyou just can't force things too hard, if the AI cannot place something and you force it with high weights it starts bending reality to fit the prompt
So she is in demandShould have said something sooner
Remember to wear protection
From my testing so far, I can't get Zonkey to look nearly as good as PonyRealism. (Picrel is Pony, not Zonkey)Zonkey seems so be too noisy and the faces are always fucked for me. I did use a refiner, but it didn't seem to help THAT much and it took too long to gen things. Skill issue?
>>8327582
>>8327591
>>8327582Did you lower the CFG to 4? At 7 the grime is so crazy the refiner can't fix. Also try CLIP skip 2 and then try another sampler
>>8327599I tried several different CFG values based on sample images I saw, and I usually do CLIP skip 2
>>8327612And samplers? DPM++ 2 or 3 M SDE is usually recommended, some are terrible
adetailer pussy detection works like a charm
>>8327635missed some pubes damnthe inpaint mask is not the only thing thats gonna get dilated
>>8323889You can use "happy trail" for more hair towards the belly.
should be no more stray pubes and switched to better pussy prompt and larger titsall automated by adetailer, no manual steps
>>8327943That's a waste of perfectly fine milk.
>>8328003
I have about 1k pictures of a similar model.
>>8322113can anyone re-upload it please to catbox or something?! thanks. really wanted this one :/
>>8327943>>8328453a literal titcow
>>8327943>>8328453>>8328547fresh milk at the table, love it>>8328512>>8328517maximum realism>>8328519is this inspired from some really really old bondage scan? the face and size of the tits are really specific, and the pose matcheswe page 9 now, guess I'll bake a new thread
New thread>>8328842>>8328842>>8328842
bump
