Previous thread: >>8319401It´s real to me, damnit >>8328842>Pick one and install Stable Diffusionhttps://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui?tab=readme-ov-file#installation-and-runninghttps://github.com/lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge?tab=readme-ov-file#installing-forgehttps://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI?tab=readme-ov-file#installing>Recommended /aco/ SD modelshttps://civitai.com/models/257749/pony-diffusion-v6-xlhttps://civitai.com/models/288584?modelVersionId=324524https://civitai.com/models/184813?modelVersionId=445464>Beginner prompts: save an image and load it with PNG INFOhttps://files.catbox.moe/ie7m8h.png (embed)https://civitai.com/images(K.I.S.S.)>Optional extensionshttps://github.com/DominikDoom/a1111-sd-webui-tagcompletehttps://github.com/hako-mikan/sd-webui-regional-prompterhttps://github.com/Mikubill/sd-webui-controlnethttps://github.com/Haoming02/sd-forge-coupleComfyUI only:https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager>Paint with Krita & SDhttps://github.com/Acly/krita-ai-diffusion>/aco/ LoRAs:https://rentry.org/acorepo>GPU tier listhttps://files.catbox.moe/wseg1y.png (embed)>Related threads>>>/h/hdg>>>/e/edg>>>/d/ddg>>>/u/udg>>>/g/sdg>>>/trash/slop>>>/trash/sdg>>>/vg/aids>>>/vt/vtai
And that was the archival dump.
>>8331801Not that fan of the bimbo look, but that´s a nice one.
Requesting Lori Loud giving futa Carlota a blowjob.
Requesting Odalia giving futa Luz a buttjob.
>>8331818>>8332073fuck off
>>8331765Love that plastic style. That a lora?
>>8331818>>8332073Where's the attention whore that rewarded him last thread? C'mon, be a good cumrag and finish what you started.
half of what i make now is Fernando ripoffs, https://civitai.com/posts/3719543
Honey Goblin got a Lora and it's been glorious
>>8327728In the previous thread there were two images of a comic book with Samus. Can I please see catbox for them? If there is no such possibility then fine. ^^
>>8332617moar honey!
>>8332636
Dumb question, is there an archive site for all this?
>>8332628he stitched these together in gimp/photoshopin case you are wondering if the whole thing could be genned, it can't>>8332682literally google "4chan archive aco", it spits out two websites
>>8332713I took a stab at it when the initial anon had the idea, got sorta-kinda-almost close
>>8332713>>8332719score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up, score_5_up, score_4_up, (comic panels:1.3), science fiction, ADDCOMMblonde hair, blue eyes, samus aran, spacecraft, hallway, blue bodysuit, walking, BREAK ADDCOLclose-up, ear against door, samus aran, listening through door, against door, confused, ?, blonde hair, blue eyes, steel door, BREAK ADDROWfrom behind, blue bodysuit, low angle shot, standing in doorway, opening door, light coming through door, BREAK ADDCOLsamus aran, blue bodysuit, orgasm face, moaning, kneeling, all fours, solo, sex, sex machine, motion lines, BREAKNegative prompt: score_6, score_5, score_4, child, kid, childish, childlike, loli, extra arms, extra limbs, extra hands, disfigured, deformed, muted colors, 3d,
>>8332724apparently I took a lot of stabs at ittxt2img grid
>>8332713Nah i know that, Im talkin about a site just for ai like the -boorus and such.
>>8332735civitai
is there a recommended tutorial for actually making decent gens? Most tutorials I've found are about 2 years old and are blatantly differentinstalled webui/pony and then figured out how to use pony as a checkpoint (I think)images went from lego bricks to actual picturesbut they clearly don't match the quality of the example images on civitai pony despite me using the same prompt (and having the same metadata other than guidance which I can't find)been using this pony if that matters https://civitai.com/models/257749/pony-diffusion-v6-xlsorry if the tutorial is up in the OP, I was powerbombed onto concrete as a child and have yet to form a vocabulary for SD
>>8332758I think honestly the best way to start from the very bottom is to use civit AIfind a pic you like, click the remix button, then you can change around a few things in the prompt and see what happened, test the loras and so on or just plain ass copy the prompt and loras used to your local
>>8332758You are following prompts but not using the associated LoRAs. Use autismmix dpo, and on civit it lists the LoRAs used in generating images. Without those exact same LoRAs, you won't get the same results
>>8332758Don't actually use pony, use a fine tune like autism mix or whatever else. Base pony is melty as fuck and makes images that look like you saved a jpg at 30% quality 5 times over.Download catboxes and import them to see the prompts. There are some prompts specific to pony like the score up stuff. There are also secret tokens you can use but it's not strictly necessary.https://rentry.org/ponyxl_loras_n_stuff#reverse-engineered-hashed-tokensLearn how to inpaint. This applies no matter what model you use.
>>8332787some pony derivatives to look at, no loras were used for these examples
>>8332758https://civitai.com/articles if you're not one of these idiots that requires a fucking Youtube video for everything
>>8332758>>8332774a lot of the sloppy melty looking shit posted here is because of loras set to weight 1, and having four of them. Some don't work well together, so try to prompt some stuff with no Loras.Picrel
Think anyone can do a remake of Sailor Moon and Killer Frost scissoring. I got both a WIP and sketch concepts that can be used for reference.
Requesting pinups of Molly Jo from Amphibia.
>>8332943Good advice to get used to prompting without loras first, though that's not all there is to melty fried shit. You can use a lot of loras without it looking fried, I do so regularly. Some people just don't know (or refuse to) upscale and use god awful models like pony turbo.
>>8332441About as easily as you can, fucking retard.
>>8332734>>8332646>>8332617>>8332518pumping
>>8331741What lora or style is this one?
>>8333109>fucking retardRight? What kind of retard rewards spammers? Now the spammer knows that he just needs to spam every thread that, eventually, an attention whore will deliver. So, chop chop cumrag. You have deliveries to fulfill.
all my gens look like shitis it because I don't use LorAs?
>>8331732>https://rentry.org/acorepo>(raise weight between 0-3)what are weights?
>>8333198CFG scale.
>>8333201so deafult is 7 so raise to 10?
>>8333198>>8333201What? No. The lora weight has nothing to do with cfg scale. Like when you load the lora and it says <lora:big-chungus:1> it has a weight of 1. You can say <lora:big-chungus:0.5> to reduce its weight to 0.5.You usually don't use a weight above 1 unless you really want to push the effect of something. Most style loras work best in the 0.6-0.8 range.
>>8333230>Most style loras work best in the 0.6-0.8 range.huh? then what does rentry mean by >raise weight between 0-3?
It's LoRA weights and CFG Scale, but that one is specifically meaning LoRAs. You need to play with those settings and sometimes the sample steps. For example, this is with 25 steps, 0.8 LoRA weight, and obviously CFG scale from 4-9. If you're using pony/autism, you'll want to start out making grids to see what styles work best for you. If you're on A1111, go down to scripts > x/y/z plots, and set the first one to CFG Scale, and type in the comma separated values, so like 4,5,6,7,8,9 and then in the second line, set that one to Prompt S/R. Then you'll need to go to your txt2img box, set your LoRA to it's lowest weight, and then increment it up by .1 in the y values box in scripts. So <lora:whatever:0.1> in your prompt, then <lora:whatever:0.1>, <lora:whatever:0.2>, etc. in the Y-values. It'll take a while to gen because it's doing an image for each lora weight at each cfg scale, but it'll give you a good idea of what weights work best with what scale. If you want faster gens and just want LoRA weights, set CFG to 7.5 and just use the Prompt S/R in the x- type/values box. I'll give an example of that in a minute when it finishes.
>>8333246>raise weight between 0-3I have no idea. You can technically use a weight of 3 but that's impractical 99% of the time.
>>8333247>>8333246>>8333215>>8333198This is what LoRA weights do on a default of 7 CFG. And this is on one of the more stable/consistent LoRAs. I can give an example of one of the ones I've made that drastically changes in a few minutes, too. As you can see, going up to 1 went and made the image gen shit itself. These are all on the same seed, too.
>>8333197what are you looking to come up with? cause some of the gens I see here are fucking garbage to my eyes, but some goon thinks melty cum covered bimbos are hot, so roll with that if that's what you like. And no, Loras ain't the answer except on SD1.5 or if you're looking for a very specific character/style
>>8333201No, retard, CFG scale means 'Classifier Free Guidance' which is a fancy term for "let the model go farther outside or adhere more closely to the parameters I specified".CFG scale of 1 means "fuck it, gimme what you want". CFG scale of 20 means "draw the picture based on only those assets in the checkpoint that include these tags"
>>8333287I keep getting fucked up anatomy. Is it just bad prompting? I have booru extension installed, but whatever I add it just turns to shit
>>8333321You need to turn down highres fix denoise to 0.1
>>8333321hiresfix is too high denoise but base gen shouldn't look that shitty to begin with. do another base gen and then post it in catbox.
>>8333321Denoise is kinda related to CFG. Denoise of a higher value (like .75) will completely replace the selected area. Denoise .25 is what I use if I like the image, but it needs some lines connected, or has some odd colors. If the original totally is what I want, use .15. I don't use Hi-Res fix in txt2img, cause it wastes time on gens that are shit. Run without it, find a gen that works for you, then send to img2img inpaint (paying attention to that Denoise value) to fix fucked up hands, wrong colors, etc, and then when it's not shit, send it to Img2Img, and use the SD-Upscaler via the Script dropdown at the bottom to upscale.
>>8333282Here's one of those ones that drastically change. 0.7 is what I gen with this one at, as lower gives me too realistic, higher tends to fuck up anatomy and melt.
>>8333287cum covered bimbos you say
>>8333341https://files.catbox.moe/85sb7x.png(no hiresfix)>>8333351>just inpaintis this the standard? are there no good txt2img from the get go?
>>8333368I still love you baby
>>8333351>>8333369IMO this way is not the right way to go. Use hires fix and adetailer to get hands, faces and small details rendered correctly. Use dynamic prompt and txt2img and generate a bunch of gens and see if there are any you really love, then get the seed and keep iterating. IMO if you are inpaiting you might as well pop it in photoshop. Part of the fun is the lack of control and unexpectedness of the generations. Again, YMMV
if I want two specific characters kissing, do I need a lora of each character ><lora:charA:0.1> + <lora:charB:0.1>or a like a lora that's trained to draw those two characters together?><lora:charA&B:0.1>
>>8333369very few mate, and the miraculous goddamn power of inpaint will amaze you. Pay attention to random seventeen finger hands, and body parts completely out of line, and you can fix a janky gen that you like because of...whatever, but it takes a minute
>>8333376I do use Adetailer (face_yolov8n.pt and mediapipe_face_mesh_eyes_only) on txt2img, cause it's a fucking horror show without, but doing Hires on txt2img results in so many useless gens
>>8333393for me the time it takes to just generate a new image is almost always shorter than it takes to inpaint.
>>8333369>are there no good txt2img from the get go?You can get decent stuff out of the image, but if you have attention to detail, you're gonna want to learn to inpaint. It's 100% a mental block to get over the intimidation of inpaint if you're not used to doing it, it's not hard.>>8333376>IMO if you are inpaiting you might as well pop it in photoshopInpainting is easy and a good way to refine the details of an image even if you're not drastically changing it. Inpaint sections like the face and torso at like 0.57 denoising and you'll make it crisper and add detail without much extra time or effort. Adetailer also is no silver bullet for faces or hands, and besides, it's just automated inpaint at the end of the day.
>>8333397but sometimes, there's just that perfect composition and everything matches what you want to see, but the bitch has nine thumbs and a fucking tentacle out her ear, isn't it simpler to inpaint that goddamn tentacle out?
>>8333397> I don't want to fix anything, just spend that time making moreslop mentality
>>8333398>>inpaint>>easycome on now >>8333401we are at an ideological impasse LOL
>>8333373Velma > Daphne
>>8333408nah >>8333413always
>>8333414
>>8333413> tell me you've never inpainted without telling me you've never inpainted
>>8333376>Part of the fun is the lack of control and unexpectedness of the generations.This has to be one of the worst takes I've ever seen. This mentality is why the /aco/ version of these threads is the worst.In the last thread, I talked about the detailed spammers, and here's proof of their mentality. This is why their images are boring. This is why their images get worse the more you look at them. Same face, same composition, same pose, same inbred prompt.
>>8333408lol I ain't gonna lie, spent a lot of cycles trying to inpaint some shit hands/misplaced eyeballs/ugly shit out of gens, but when it finally worked, I was happy with it
>>8333428keep whining LOL
>>8333408>>8333413dammit, responded to the wrong anon
>>8333369>shipping \(fandom\),this isn't a real tag, take it out>888x1344 this res doesn't exist and is probably where most of the hands are coming from. try 832 x 1216 or 832 x 1152. 1344 is a popular landscape resolution but not common in portrait. >cfg 7turn it down to 5. pony is a burnt model and it needs lower cfg.>steps 20 sampler dpm++ 2m karrasI don't know that sampler very well but I'd start with 30 steps minimum for anything that isn't euler or restart. grab the DPO lora from civit and it will also help try to reduce extra hands/fingers.
>>8333380Regional prompter 99% of the time.
>>8333428Yeah mang. It's hard to believe that fucking /trash/ is better because they figured out that they needed a dedicated slop thread.
>>8333438>>8333431if you consider that time well spent, have fun
>>8333444>>complains that another board is better>>continues to post here take a lap
>>8333444/trash/ is better because they have intent. That alone makes things better. Now, pick the last 10 images on this thread and look at the previous thread. You'll be able to pick 3+ images that are the exact same with minor variations. This is the low-quality, low-effort adetailer spam.
>>8333494then post there what in the fuck are you talking about
>>8333494It wasn't always like this. I drop in every once in a while since I still browse /aco/ generally but the thread's been in a sad state for a good while now. In a regular thread it's not normal to post the same shit with minor differences, beats me why that kind of mentality flies here. I'm not even talking about bad hands that could be fixed or anons getting started and wanting to learn the ropes. It's the samey shit that's a real problem. Just look at /vt/, they post samey batches all the time but they have the courtesy to just make single posts with a bunch of catbox links and the best of the batch as the post image.
>>8333520>>8333494>>8333444is this retard talking to himself or what LOL
>>8333440thanks, it's betterI'll try dpo, adetailer, regional prompter to boot
is there an alternative to the default inpainter ui? it's very shoddy and I hate it.
>>8333505Why? I'm here because I want /co/ stuff. This is why this thread got split last year. I just have to wait for the low-quality spam to slow down so I can start posting again.Either way, your image is a good example. If you've seen one, you've seen all. Adetailer spam that amounts to "eh, good enough"
>>8333553forge couple is probably the easiest method to get what you want if you're using forge. adetailer is for using at the last step after genning > inpainting > upscaling > adetailer.
>>8333567Why do you keep saying "adetailer spam" as if that's why it's low quality? Adetailer is a tool. It makes as much sense as saying inpaint spam, photoshop spam, or hammer spam. Their slop looks like slop because they are slop connoisseurs. Adetailer has nothing to do with it.
>>8333573does reginoal not work on forge? or is couples just a better option?
>>8333634couple is just significantly easier to work with. regional prompter works, it's just a bitch and a half to figure out.
>>8333634yes, regional works in forge picrel
>>8333648well, I lied, cause not picrelpicrel
Man I just got back into SD and it's crazy how good it's gotten. I could only dream of getting results this good with barely any work or with Loras on 1.5.
>>8333653also a good example of "pay fucking attention" cause I just noticed my redhead nurse is missing a fucking arm
>>8333656I was going to say thats part of why couple is easier to work with lol. better attention cross spaces.
>>8333580nta but I think he's using it as an example of the kind of attitude that's averse to manual fixing and applying intent to the gens, where the only investment they're willing to do is to run the face and hands through adetailer and anything after that is simply a waste of GPU cycles because those cycles could be used to crank out more shit. I'm with you though, I'd rather call it slop. Adetailer just happens to be the only tool sloppas care to use.
>>8333580>Adetailer is a toolThat's the point. The overreliance on adetailer is a problem. They know that adetailer will fix the fucked up face and hands. They can generate 16 images and just spam away without thinking. If adetailer didn't exist, they would have to inpaint manually. For this, they would have to look at what they generated and not just glance at it as quickly as possible.If you look at the face, it's beautiful. The eyes make sense, the lips are plump and delicious, the ears are cute. If you look around, you'll see a watermark or Patreon logo, fucked up limbs, nonsensical clothing, and more stuff that could be easily fixed with inpaint. And how can you avoid these problems as lazily as possible? By making sure the overall composition stays the same. That's why their images always look the same. That's why it lacks intent. The moment you start thinking about what you're doing, you can't spam and fry your dopamine receptors.
>>8333661couples might do couples, but regional can do other stuff!
>>8333687goddamnit, panties fucked up. forgive that, early pony slop
>>8333683>If you look at the face, it's beautiful. The eyes make sense, the lips are plump and delicious, the ears are cute. If you look around, you'll see a watermark or Patreon logo, fucked up limbs, nonsensical clothing, and more stuff that could be easily fixed with inpaint. The entirety of your complaint is because they used adetailer at the wrong step and not enough people bully shit images. The image creation process consists of gen until fixable image > fix image > upscale > adetailer. This is the way. If you were just shitting on shitty images, I would be joining you right now. The fact that you're shitting on a tool means I have to correct you for being wrong. If you want to blame a tool, it's stable diffusion for putting art in the hands of everyone.
>>8333683it is surprisingly easy to miss things like a missing arm or an extra nipple or sixteen toes, as long as the eyes/tits/ass/whatever floats your boat turns out well
>>8333701I've wasted hours now inpainting images without noticing fucked up backgrounds or some small detail but to not notice sixteen toes or an extra nipple means either you're still at the stage where you should be gooning and putting SD down or you're retarded anon.
>>8333710I may in fact be retarded, fair enough
>>8333712
>>8333683Anon, you're not even wrong, but your expectations for this thread are way off.This isn't the "perfect finished AI masterpieces" headquarters. It's just a thread on the cartoon porn board where people can post things they personally thought were interesting.
>>8333725you better start taking your cartoon porn more seriously, buddy
>>8333698>The entirety of your complaint is because they used adetailer at the wrong step and not enough people bully shit images.No, my complaint is the spam. At no point did I say people use adetailer wrong or that bad images should be bullied. It all started because of this horrible take >>8333376. After that, I rambled about the mentality of these spammers, and the easiest way to spot them is the samey images that rely on adetailer. >If you were just shitting on shitty images, I would be joining you right now.So you don't have the balls to voice your opinion without others agreeing with you?>The fact that you're shitting on a tool means I have to correct you for being wrong.The problem isn't the tool but the people using it and their mentality.
Does the background remover extension just toss the background it cuts out or does it separate them into two different files? It'd be nice to have a character clean background that also share the same lighting/perspective to composition in photoshop
I just want to say I appreciate the last 4 pics. Good people doing good things.>>8333739>rely on adetaileryou retarded fucking ape. If you had half a fucking brain you'd stop saying adetailer. Shit on the shitty images for what they are. Shitty. Don't use the name of a tool that's completely unrelated or I have to correct you. >So you don't have the balls to voice your opinion without others agreeing with you?No. That's some mentally imbalanced fucking headcanon you've created.I don't feel the need to shit on any random image for having 8 fingers unless they say something wrong or spam. We all made shitty images at some point. The post you replied to with 3 people calling him retarded? I don't feel a need to jump in and call him retarded. He's wrong. >The problem isn't the tool but the people using it and their mentality.Everyone uses adetailer anon. All the good images you've seen? adetailer. All the shit images you've seen? adetailer. It's completely unrelated to the core problem.
>>8333736>tfw my cartoon porn license is revoked
>>8333701Yes, this tunnel vision is how you end with a thread with the same images spammed. This is why "lack of control and unexpectedness of the generations" is a stupid take. AI isn't as random as it seems, but they can't see it. This tunnel vision makes them think that minor variations are something entirely new and worth spamming. But dingus thinks I'm criticizing adetailer.>>8333753Shut up dingus. You read and interpreted my words wrong, got mad, and now think you're correcting something?>Everyone uses adetailer anon. All the good images you've seen? adetailer. All the shit images you've seen? adetailer. It's completely unrelated to the core problem.The good images, if there were mistakes, what would the person have done before upscaling/posting? Used inpaint or other things to fix it. And the spammers? Nothing, because Adetailer does a good enough job. So they end up over-relying on it; this is why I call them adetailer spammers.The only thing with quality on their images is the places adetailer works. Recognition tools don't have intent; that's why you end with the same face, same pose, same concept, and same inbred prompt.I'm 100% sure you didn't understand what I'm saying, so don't waste our time replying, dingus.
>>8333808fucking retard.
>>8334029
funny how the people complaining about quality and slop are always nogen whinersmissing intent lol
is this fried? I've played around too much and suffer from some kind of blindness
>>8334275I have no idea what fried means but I like this
>>8334275the shards in her arm look almost like texton the left leg one of the black lines vanishes
>>8334275doesn't look fried to me, looks pretty legit
>>8334275No, "fried" is when the details become muddled and the whole image is an incoherent mess. The lines and colors here are clean. Just because there are flaws in the image doesn't make it fried, that describes a specific aesthetic that usually comes from the model outputting garbage or using shit loras.
>>8334319that's a nice style, is it a single lora or a blend?
>>8334334it's Ponyfaetality with an alternate Adetailer (?!?!) checkpoint of RealCartoonXL and a bodysuit lorahttps://files.catbox.moe/hg3hbk.png
My cumbrain is creatively bankrupt. Are wildcards best way to go for semi-randomizing gens? Girl, __outfit__, __position/pose__, __location__ something like that?Never used them.
>>8334491wildcards, or even just lists work{standing|kneeling|seiza|on back|one knee}, looking at viewer, {beach|desert|forest|glacier|street}, outdoors, from {front|side|below|above}, {smile|smirk|naughty face|slight smile|excited}, __eyecolor__ {long sleeves|sleeveless|short sleeves} __clothing__25 years old, adult woman,__hairlength__, __hairstyle__, __haircolor__,
>Prompts given: active galactic nucleiJust like how Einstein envisioned it.
hires latent ruins my gens. esregan 4x works, but is slow as heck. How do I fix this? I want speedy resizes
>>8332628Oh hi. I responded down here before I realized the old thread is autosaging. >>8334439>>8330538>>8327732>>8327737So for all of these, it looks like I deleted the individual images that I used. I've got limited hard drive space, so I purge images semi-frequently.If you're looking for the style, it's generally a mix of:<lora:Rainbow Style SDXL_LoRA_Pony Diffusion V6 XL>and<lora:Smooth Anime 2 Style SDXL_LoRA_Pony Diffusion V6 XL>on PXL turbo, no other loras other than that.
>>8334491totallyalso the wildcard packs you can download contain tons of things to try out you'd never think aboutoutfits, poses, facial expressions, lighting, backgrounds, camera angles
>>8332758Just figure it out yourself retard
>>8334966
>>8334966>>8334973these are great as usualpony always makes dildos with realistic veins and a pronounced glanshas anybody ever made a smooth shaped one, by prompting?
>>8335024my guess would be that it draws dildos by mostly just colouring in penises
>>8335024Have you tried vibrator rather than dildo?
Yo I just had the wildest ideaCan someone make Odalia giving futa Luz a buttjob.
>>8335056yeah, any color, any size it can makesometimes it's a bad dragon dildo thingit's kind of weird that it can make these complex things but the simpler shape is either harder or impossible to prompt>>8335059briefly, it always made a little vibrating egg thingy that disappeared in the pussymaybe should try moreI might try running a couple images of what I'm thinking of through the CLIP interrogator. maybe it knows the shape under a very different name
>>8335074put egg vibrator in the negative then.
>>8332713Thank you so much for answer! I often see his work here and they are really good, so I decided that he was able to create this by using generation. Because he good AI creator
>>8334588That shoulder is all sorts of fucked up, same with the ribs. Looks like that one artist's style though.
This is why you don't feed request fags
any recommendations on a good upscaler for cartoony style? I have the 4x ultrasharp but going 4x seems a bit excessive, 2x would be fine
>>8335326you don't have to go to 4x, I upscale 2x with 4x-AnimeSharp but to be honest I'm to blind to notice any difference...
>>8334550lol at the Star in the background going 'Wait, that's not me'
>>8331752How looks Prompt and Loras for this art?
>>8333414Don't worry, you'll grow out of your Reddit gained opinions one day
Anybody get that Sharron Spitz Lora from civitai yesterday? I opened it up on another tab, then when I checked on it the damn thing was gone...Also Happy Summerween!
>>8333230Is big chungus lora really a thing or is it a joke? I can't check rn
>>8336092there's a single big chungus lora on civit. SD 1.5
any new notable checkpoints? been using nothing but autismmixConfetti
This is such a weird thing to gen. Not because the image is weird, but the process was something.>make LoRA using ocdonut honeyselect character by posing her in neo>prompt and combine LoRAs to get rid of 3D>inpaint + adetailer the face>throw in a third LoRA for the pussy>upscale 1.5x using a different upscaler than normal>get this
>>8336696>LoRA for the pussywhat lora did you use? I have trouble making pussy looking natural
>>8336696There's a slightly convoluted way to make that kind of lora.https://rentry.org/bp87n
>>8336724labiaxxl. It works on 2D and pony.
>>8336767Damn, I'd fertilize her crescent.>>8336557Well, SD3 came out, but there's a big thing about CivitAI banning resources about it due to license issues.And Pony v7 is in the works.
>>8336765Funnily enough, that's kind of what I did. But I didn't do face at multiple angles, just body. Front, side, back with nude, front with clothes/underwear as well. Headshots were done with clothes, nudity, and without glasses.
Prompt bros I need help. For pony derivatives, how can I create an image of two girls standing next to each other with their breasts touching?(Preferably from side view also SFW). Sorry for homo content, but this is the pose I am looking for. It uses "pectoral docking, touching pectorals" which doesn't seem to work with women.I know that "double paizuri, collaborative paizuri" exist BUT I am not looking for titjob or penis, just women next to each other, and standing.I tried crap like "breasts squeezed together, breast press, breasts touching" but nothing provides reasonably consistent results.
>>8336858If a lora of this kind of pose exists, I am fine with that too. I tried to search civitai, but couldn't find anything similar.
>>8336858You'll need regional prompter to do it. Try tags like pressing breasts, yuri, breasts touching, etc.
>>8336864I already am using regional prompterI was using those tags too but forgot about yuri, let me see if it helps.
>>8336878Yuri tends to help A LOT with multiple girls. Worst case, use control net as well.
>>8336878inpainting an existing image and using adetailer for each face is also a way to get what you want
>>8336847>Pony v7 is in the worksI'm worried on this one, between the war on artist tags and the safety manifesto...
>>8336858>>8336864the term you're looking for is "docking". Symmetrical or Asymmetricalhttps://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=symmetrical_docking
>>8336910>>8336881>>8336878>>8336858I got it with just img2img but I'll try regional prompting it next.
>>8336930Didn't even need regional prompter with this. Just spat it out with the same params using txt2img I put in img2img.
>>8336930works even without RP, but RP will help with the character bleed"score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, (score_9:1.1), (score_8:1.1),2girls, alice in wonderland, snow white, symmetrical docking, pole dancing, seductive smile, thighhighs, standing,long hair, ginger,woman, 25 years old, sexy, fit, skinny, fair skin, shiny skin,"
>>8336881Alright after some research and trial and error I found a way to consistently do this: "2girls, breast_contest, breast_press, facing each other, side view". Thanks for the advice but yuri does not seem to be needed.I also found a tag called "symmetrical_docking"(female equivalent of pectoral docking I guess) but it is less consistent. May help in some cases so worth nothing I think.
>>8336896I am not really good with inpainting/adetailer sadly.>>8336930Thank you, I managed to find that tag but what I described in the above comment works more consistently for me.
>>8336953adetailer is really easy and will really help you in the long run, you just use a light version of your prompt detailing the face, don't forget to use the loras. In the case of multiple characters, activate the detect left to right in the option tab and use [SEP] between each character
>>8336953>>8336948Yuri might not be needed, but it's one of those tags that ends up helping whenever multiple girls are involved. Never hurts to throw it in there and try genning a few images with and without it to see what comes out best. I got mine using even less tags - 2girls, breast press, breasts, cleavage, large breasts, looking at viewer, medium breasts, multiple girls, reaching out, selfie, symmetrical docking, BREAKAlso, adetailer is usually pretty simple. 99.9% of the time you just enable it and let it go.
>>8336900It's a little worrying, but it's probably going to be the way forward to ensure these tools don't get scrubbed from the internet. As long as there's a good dictionary for the styles, I'm happy.Also, if all the styles are accessible as "style_###" then it should be trivial to cycle any generation through all the built-in styles. Which seems kind of cool.
>>8336557I've been using Ebara, small but noticeable upgrade from Autism imo, better default artstyle and definitely less influenced by western art.
Oh by the way, is there an ass equivalent of symmetrical docking?
Krita is pretty fun
BTW, the Krita plugin now supports binding individual prompts to layers. It's a lot better than using slow/cursed browser GUIs IMO.It's also a dream tool if you know how to use photoshop/paint.
>>8336963>but it's one of those tags that ends up helping whenever multiple girls are involved. Never hurts to throw it in there and try genning a few images with and without it to see what comes out bestMy problem here is that adding yuri gives both of them affectionate expressions, while I am trying to have one girl dominant/smug and other sad/shy. But I will keep it in mind for most use cases.>Also, adetailer is usually pretty simple. 99.9% of the time you just enable it and let it go.Well if I enable adetailer here I think it confuses prompt and adds scar to Juri's face too. Or if I enable it for hands often it doesn't unfuck hands at all. I can't wrap my head around how it exactly works. I can't predict what it will exactly do so I don't use it.
>>8337081Yeah the only thing I dont like about comfy is the overcomplexity for regional prompting. But setting up Krita has solved all of my problems.
>see model "SkibiddiMix">dl>it's actually pretty good out of the box for western stuffwell, shit
>>8337159
>>8337159>>8337172Link? Doesn't show up on civitai for me?
>>8337187https://civitai.com/models/452757/skibidimix
>>8337086Yeah. I tend to run a small amount of batches when I gen multiple girls or want a specific thing. And as >>8336959 said, that's one of the 0.01% things. It reads from right to left, so you need to put [SEP] at the end if the first girl's prompt to get it to not apply it to the second and apply another specified prompt instead. And that's really just as simple as stating what character it is, the face details (if any), then saying [SEP] and starting a new line for the next girl.
>>8337191>>8337086And hands are mega fucked with it. It'll improve existing ones but not fix them. You'll need to inpaint them. The optional pussy/nipple ones work good, though. Just gotta be careful with nipple sensitivity as sometimes it'll detect things as nipples when they aren't, if your gen is bad.
>>8337190Damn, there's even a pretty good Blackarachnia in the example images there.
>>8337191Huh that [SEP] thing seems useful here, thanks.>>8337194>And hands are mega fucked with itDisappointing but figures>The optional pussy/nipple ones work good, though. Just gotta be careful with nipple sensitivity as sometimes it'll detect things as nipples when they aren't, if your gen is bad.Thanks for the additional tips anon.
>>8333567damn you are mad LOL imagine making this image instead of just posting stuff you think is good. Absolute baby brain. Your opinion, and thats what it is, a shitty opinion means nothing to me.
you are not ready
>>8337246LFG
>>8337224There is apparently this kicker though:"The order in which objects are detected is highly arbitrary, so use with caution."So it may take multiple tries to get which face is which correctly.
oh no
>>8337246>>8337263much to think about
have one more
Combination of Nipple Ring and Pillory loras came up with something rather unprompted
>>8337241>damn you are mad LOLIt wasn't me the one that tried to start shit after 2 days. I'm sorry that you got so offended that you can't let it go.Either way, another example of adetailer spam. Let's start with the dimensions and size. Sure, it's jpg, but if you saved it at 100% quality, it would've halved the image size. The image itself is fried. This isn't a stylistic choice; it's laziness birthed from relying too much on adetailer. Look at the cleavage, that border is a sign that the image is fried. That blinding white highlight next to her mouth is also a sign. The image is melting all over the place. One of her hands has 8 fingers. 20 seconds inpaint it would have fixed this. If you look at the prompt of this image, it's the same inbred prompt used by the adetailer spammers. If you go back 1 thread, you'll find this same image, yadda, yadda...At this point, I'm just repeating myself. And don't waste both of our time replying; the best you can do is simply say, "Haha, stay mad" while proving everything I'm saying.
>>8337316fingers and stuff aside, the oily smeary style is just awful and I can only hope people will bother to do better in time
>>8337316post one of your masterpieces thenI'll wait
>>8336071its back up, had to remove the pics and still it took 20 hours to get it reviewed
>>8337316>engaging with an obvious attention whore who keeps replying until people respond to himngmi
>>8337364it's time for a dedicated AI boardwhere all posts must have an image that doesn't exist (like r9k but for pics)
>>8337316>>dont waste my time replying>>took the time to open photoshop and put meaningless circles over my gencome on man this trolling is so embarrassing. Not posting your own shit and being so condescending is just wild LOL >>8337364noted
>>8337376He's not wrong in his analysis, you know. Pretending he is just makes you look weak and pathetic same with falling back on the "lol troll" argument. That image is blown out and overburned which a little touch up in photoshop or inpainting could have fixed.Your current image is better. Her proportions are still a bit odd (shoulders are too compressed, that's just an sd issue) but it looks good overall.
>>8336964Anal in the pussy? DisappointedShould have been anal in the ass
>>8336900What's the safety manifesto?
>>8337376>1 thread>the best you can do is simply say, "Haha, stay mad" while proving everything I'm saying.Another example of adetailer spam, yadda, yadda... If you don't want to hear the truth, stop interacting with me. Simple.
>>8337390not the anon that goes anal about it, but since we're all art critics around here I still think that this layer/finish of the oily smeariness or whatever you call it just makes it unpleasant to look at. I know it's hard to get rid of it completely, and it's not as bad as some of the older ones but still especially if one dumps 50 very sameish pics per thread
>>8337390i simply disagree and those elements of the composition dont bother me. I must create for myself first and foremost. but frankly I really have no issue with these opinions or anyone having them about stuff Ive posted. Its the fact that he is quite mad and autistic about it, writing long screeds and implying I'm a moron that i need to push back on because its fucking cringe and baseless. I see all sorts of wack gens and borderline loli stuff here that I think looks awful. Most of the time I just scroll on by and find an interesting gen to post about because that's the point of the thread. this asshole would rather the threads die with six identical images of zero suit samus in smooth pony style than have a bustling thread at all.
>>8337412sorry i think these look great get over it. if you cant simply hide my posts. Or keep saving and editing them like a weird little freak idk
I like Fionna
>>8337428Now this is a good base image to work with. The simple gradient background doesn't take the attention off of the main subject and greatly reduces melting the adetailer can't fix like this >>8337376 mess. Look at the cans and the hand holding the can. The backlight is also something that breaks the monotony and most of the samey felling that the spammed images have. I can go back 4 threads, and I'll probably not find images like this. I could go on, but I'm sure you don't want to hear it.The problem is prompt inbreeding. Look at the default bimbo face. This is like a character creator, the only change was the character's race. Everything else is set to default. But this can be easily fixed with inpaint and intent.
>>8335295J Scott Campbell?
every time this autist mentions adetailer or intent I bust out laughingalways words words words, would be way easier to show one of his own work but nah
what are the best/your favorite available western art style loras? gattles one is pretty good
>8337615>he still doesn't understand the pointC'mon dingus, don't be a coward
>>8337552Yes! Thanks, Couldn't remember his name offhand.
>>8337355Awesome! Thank you
>>8337412The prompter isn't wrong in that you really are some level of autistic. You should probably get some help to get over that, because screaming and posting the same thing over and over and over isn't going to get anyone to listen to you at all.
>>8337419>I still think that this layer/finish of the oily smeariness or whatever you call it just makes it unpleasant to look at.It can be unsettling in some images, others I find it ok if they really look oil painted or have a particular style, but I can see how they can be unpleasant.>>8337421In general I like your gens, I'm just pointing out that that autistic guy isn't wrong just because he's autististic. Of course you're free to gen what you want and in general I'd rather see your stuff than as you say 6 almost the same gens of Zero Suit Samus Aran or any of that pedo crap.
>>8337664not a lora, slu in pony blends very well
lot of Samus hate in here, I shall never post Samus again. Who's next, Violet Parr?
samus is greatbut it gets boringhe needs to innovateand he's too arrogantmaybe he earned itbut come on make new stuff
>>8337752And you should seek help to see why you can't handle criticism. This isn't normal.
>>8337778samus was just an example LOL and besides if we get rid of samus, then its raven, violet, etc and we cant have that
>>8337511hell yeah dog
>>8337246loss.jpg
anyone what artist lora is used for this?https://twitter.com/ByTheBroken1/status/1804877070436270463
>>8338174anyone know*
>>8337540Dude thinks he's a professional critic or something.
>>8337819It ain't me dipshit, I'm just pointing out what's real. You on the other hand are really butthurt, which is pretty funny.
>>8335063No, because I suck ass at prompting
>>8338190>professional critic Thanks, but being against spam and knowing how to distinguish it isn't the same as being a critic. The fact you think they are is a testament to the quality of these threads, though.>>8338217Anon, get help. This type of obsession and anger isn't healthy. Both your health and hairline will thank you.If you're going to reply, at least try to make an argument.
what if someone posted an image that would be novel
>>8338300no, no, no, keep bitching, this isn't an image board
>>8338324>genning Nani and not Chelngmi m8.
>>8338300Not enough lipstick smudges, I'm a professional critic! xD
>What's the matter babe, you haven't touched your breakfast
>>8338347I dunno. Just watched the film with my gf's family a couple hours ago and I came home wanting more Nani.
>>8338346
>>8333376This is stupid. Using hiresfix doesn't "fix" things. It often makes them worse. >>8333351 is absolutely the way to go. No sense wasting time making hires versions and hoping the slot machine gives you something good. In that same time you can make multiples of regular/smaller res and pick the best one to fix, instead of just make one where something is fucked up. And using upscaling with low denoise maintains your image better, and uses less memory and works faster, enabling you to make higher resolutions. It's a no-brainer.
>>8338654>Using hiresfix doesn't "fix" things. It often makes them worse. Too much noise, between 0.3 and 0.4 is the sweet spot.
>>8337957More like this
>>8338840
>>8339188The Force is strong, etc, etc...>Captcha - SAW JRThere a new movie coming out?
amazin'
Could someone gen something for me? I want to see Yennefer from the Witcher in the outfit on left but with deep cleavage and obvious cameltoe in an artstyle like the image on the right. There shouldn't be any sex, she should just be standing in a fairly neutral pose, just with the big boobs, either exposed or still in her blouse I don't mind.
>>8339393Did you take a VaM scene and run it through SD?
>>8339188Yessss
Requesting Diana going skinny dipping
>>8339460not that anon, but it's koikatsu. same principle tho, can do it with any 3d software like daz studio, vam, koi, honey select, etc
>>8339310hot damn!
>>8339862It turned out really well.
Are there really only 2 XL LoRAs of Yennefer?
Used up
>>8340269Agreed. Half the Pony character loras on CivitAI really are just tweaks from built-in training
I know you people are only looking at the tiddies here, but all it takes is the tiniest bit of emotive content to remove the dead eyes. Happy. Sad. Outraged. Embarassed. Some kind of cue. Fucking anything but neutral-ass expressions will help your pictures immensely.
>>8340318;)
>>8340272I deleted my post cause I was barking up the wrong tree. the dude asking for yen wants her with clothes which either pony doesn't know or I can't describe well enough.>>8340156yes only 2 yen loras. only need loras if you need her clothes to be on point.
>>8340318>_<
>>8334275mind sharing the catbox ?
>>8339410my excuse to bang rocks together in Krita.https://litter.catbox.moe/585wr9.pngart style and outfit don't match for reasons. also, there is no way she is getting a cameltoe with those trousers.
>>8340570leather pants can absolutely give cameltoe.
finally, nice braces
>>8340570About Krita, how much more helpful is it to use Krita vs something like Forge?
>>8339460>>8339862exactly what that guy said just ran it through img2img; I thought I needed controlnet but I generated that without it enabled
>try to inpaint a mouth>it does this shitI found this too funny not to post.
Her trousers/breeches have something that almost looks like a codpiece, so I doubt it.Although some official art makes it look like regular leather trousers.>>8340716It uses ComfyUI. You can use Krita and regular ComfyUI at the same time.> how much more helpful is it to use Krita vs something like Forge?It depends on whether you're interested in editing images.
>>8341746 >>8340576
>>8341549Would submit to/10
>Sire, the goblin 'girl' is ready for your attention
Which other characters (on danbooru) should I do with this prompt
>>8342445Jade from Beyond Good and Evil.
>>8342589No chance on only 22 images. Usually need around 100 or so minimum for NAI.
>>8342650Huh, weird. I swear I someone post her a long time ago and I could've sworn it was NAI.
>>8331739>>8337376could i request a gangbang pic similar to this one, but with Panda Delgado from Bodybags?
new>>8343197>>8343197
