File: hegel_groyper.png (98 KB, 225x225)

98 KB PNG

>>32599657
The subjective is a labyrinth of mirrors, where answers reflect questions, and questions dissolve into interpretation. There’s no "right" way because "right" is a phantom, which is to say: constructed, deconstructed, reconstituted, and ultimately hyperreal. Others navigate it differently, maybe better, maybe worse, but comparison collapses under subjectivity’s weight. Exploring the space is simultaneously futile and essential, setting goals is both liberating and constraining. Autism, opinion, identity; these are labels that may clarify or confound. Wrongness in subjectivity is itself subjective, a Möbius strip of self-doubt. The "how" becomes the "why," the "what" becomes the "who," and suddenly, the subjective becomes the most objective of all puzzles.

>>32599657
average teen questions.
understandable.
from the deep of my heart, i think you should make friends, if not, better friends.

>>32599657
Subjectivism is for pussies and liars who live inside their own head and want to impose their neuroticism onto everything else, or to defend/validate their own irresponsible behaviours (or lack of action entirely).

>>32599657
>>32599698
I’ll continue:

Now if you are talking about social nuance, and not subjectivism/relativism as far as philosophical cowardice, then we can discuss that further. Socially there is nuance, a soft subjectivism. But it’s only that, social. Goes no further than social performances. When subjectivism breaches into ethics, morality, etc, you’ll just end up raped in the ass by some lunatic hippy while high on ayahuasca sauce or some shit.

Social nuance is basically:
“I want to say the thing/do the thing, but I can see the other person or person(s) will have their mood negatively affected if I say/do the thing too bluntly or at the wrong time.”

That’s all. So let’s say you have a cousin, you know he loves videogames, you know he enjoys talking about it. You meet him after a funeral for your uncle, his father. Objectively, would talking about videogames be enjoyable to him? Yes. Is it a good idea to do that in this example, immediately after a funeral? Fuck no. Because he won’t care about videogames and will be too inside of his own bad thoughts and hurt feelings mourning the loss of his dad to give a shit. Even if you intended to make him happy or cheer him up, it won’t matter. You may also be perceived as insensitive or heartless, since to everyone else you seem to care more about videogames than paying respects to your dead uncle.

>>32599698
>>32599730
>>32599657

So what this basically means is, there are objective rights and wrongs. Socially we have objective and subjective ways to execute right or wrong. Sometimes it’s best to perform ‘subjectivity’ and act all vague to save someone else their feelings being hurt. Other times its best to be as blunt as an autistic hammer and smash them right in their ego’s testicles to snap them out of stupidity if they are ruining their own life.

You learn which is which and when to do what vis experience. That means making mistakes, lots of them. You adapt and learn. No single written document, book, manifesto, grimoire exists to teach this to you. The best teacher is life itself. So go get some of it, even if it elevates you or crushes you, or, more realistically, does both. You learn whether you want it or not.

>>32599657
look, there is no correct "way" the way is the way. the thing you can do 'right or wrong' is to go in a positive or negative direction when you go 'your way'

Who is OP pic related.

>>32599657
There is a right and a wrong. Do not abandon morality to appease those without.

>>32599657
>Why do other people seem to handle subjective things better than me?
Really all you have to do is do what others do, what is socially acceptable and what is recognized as "the norm".

>>32600254
looks like fan art of momo from dan da dan
>>32599657
think of it this way:
a man goes to fish for their starving family and has no luck at all. 0 fish. His son sleeps more and more, he's starting to get scared that he might not wake up again at some points
then the big fishing ship of the rich fish merchant comes and unloads a ton of fish in front of him and goes to pay his workers and gets ready to go home while some of their helpers go get the truck
to start with, those people have killed those fish to sell or to eat, that's a bad thing in itself some might say. Some others see it as normal
if he steals a couple of fish to feed his family, some people might say that's wrong and under no circumstances should one steal, but on the other hand maybe that kid dies of starvation today, so he'd be indirectly guilty of his death if he doesn't.
Some might argue that fish is a game of luck anyways, sometimes you're lucky other days you're not, but also that rich dude might not even feel the absence of a couple of fish, and the operating costs of that ship would have been the same, so anything past a certain point of profit is just a surplus that would count as luck and wouldn't hurt anyone to steal
I don't know if this is THE best example but I hope you can see than in any scenario there are many gray areas where the correct thing to do is very situational
killing is bad, kiiling to defend yourself is justified
etc etc