and try to one-up me with their syphillis-induced reddit-tier evasive "reasoning".What should I do about it?
>>32600994>I willingly engage with rules and tactics that put me at a disadvantage!That makes you the retard.Don't engage them on their level. Undermine their ego and trigger their insecurities. Be what they fear.
>>32600994There's no point to arguing with morons, nothing but wastes of energy.
>>32600995Not OP but I like this. It’s the verbal/mental equivelant of getting up in someone’s face. You find out really quick whether or not someone has conviction behind their beliefs or not.
>>32600994If you can't address all their points and deconstruct them in a way that lets you destroy them you deserve what you get.But its worth noting that if they're relentless while also being stupid it might be a bot.
>>32600994Have you tried not caring what retards think?
>>32601031no
Through. Through can't be contradicted because it is a line.
>>32600994As difficult as it is - trust me, I fail this ALL of the time - try to not engage with people like that and understand that they build a model of reality and contextualize their experiences around their ideology and not vice-versa.
>>32600994>I hate retards who think they are smartWhat's it like to hate yourself?
>>32600995>>32601010>can't handle the merits of the argument so resort to ad hominem! so le based!woman behavior
>>32600994>frantically seething vitamin d starved fingers typed this postImagine being this buttblasted you have to make a new thread. Hearty kek.
>>32601102glad you liked it.
>>32601107Maybe you should book a therapy session. Nice meltdown faggot.
>>32601066that's not ad hominem. ad hominem is saying your argument is objectively wrong because you're a shit head. no one is saying to do that. they are just saying to call you a shit head.
>>32601125Hey fucktard, sentences should begin with capital letters. Holy shit you are so dumb lmfao.
>>32601066>woman behaviorNah not Ad Hominem. More like retracing the person’s motivation for their beliefs all the way back to their insecurity or weakness and then calling it out. It cuts through all the bullshit and semantics and turns the engagement into something personal. Try it.
>>32600994You know you've won an argument on reddit when they respond with 10+ sentences, none of which address your point.
>>32601125>can't handle the merits of the argument so resort to pretty namecalling! so le based!even worse than woman behavior. 10-year-old-having-a-tantrum behavior.>>32601143>It cuts through all the bullshit and semantics and turns the engagement into something personal. yeah...that's woman behavior. you ever been with a woman? that's what they do.
>>32601162>yeah...that's woman behavior. you ever been with a woman? that's what they do.Have you been dating men with tits? Being direct and confrontational is masculine as masculine can get. Women are known for being passive-aggressive, side-stepping your points only to throw emotionally charged acid at you. Totally indirect, just how a pseudo-intellect will argue his points.
>>32600994Welcome to the internet. Did you just plop out of your mother's cunt yesterday? With threads like this, odds are that you are the exact kind of person you're complaining about.
>>32601178turning an argument into "something personal" is woman behavior. period. there's no further debate on the issue. if the only way you can approach discourse is by bringing up shit that is not germane to said discourse and reframing it an affront against your fragile ego, then that's more of a poor reflection on you as someone who's poorly socialized and has the emotional control of a toddler. don't bother replying to me, i've grown bored of this thread and am closing out the tab.
>>32601066>woman behaviorWoman is feared so yes
>>32600994kill yourself
>>32601162>10-year-old-having-a-tantrum behavior.Yes.Is your only counter "Noooo I can't defeat that as easily"?
>>32601311>that's more of a poor reflection on you as someone who's poorly socialized and has the emotional control of a toddler.I know you areBut what am I?
>>32601137>wah u no use caps the post i responded to didn't use caps, and the fact that you didn't also quote that post in this message shows your argument here is not in good faith>>32601162>even worse than woman behavior. 10-year-old-having-a-tantrum behavior.shut up bitch
>>32601361Sentences end with periods too, retard.
>>32600994>What should I do about it?Be coherent
>>32601324Does your mother know you are on the internet this late on a school night?
>>32600995>>32601010Might makes right!
>>32600994call them out on their bad faith midwittery and just don't engage there's an easy form of having arguments without neuroticism and they don't use it. tell them to kill themselves
>>32600994If you argue with retards on the internet you cant be a that much smarter than them. If at all
>>32601311>*gets hit in the face because argues like shit*
>>32601599oh? not necessarily!
>>32600994Snicker
