[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/an/ - Animals & Nature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I think those charts comparing the size of animals to humans should use women as the models/female silhouettes instead of male ones. Is that stupid?
>>
>>4873266
>Is that stupid?
I don't know.
I think it's stupid to use human models for size comparison in the first place.
>>
>>4873280
It's neat to see how little space you would take up in their tumtum.
>>
>>4873280
Well, I think using a human is a good frame of reference for people to visualize how big or small something is.
>>
I think I could only beat the first one in an unarmed, no-surprise fight. Maybe the second because he doesn't have any theeths
>>
File: lh.png (356 KB, 800x450)
356 KB
356 KB PNG
>>
>>4873266
It is dumb how they always use a 6 foot man (taller than the average human on earth) as a reference rather than an average sized person. Makes the animals seem smaller.
The problem is also that 2d black and white representations will always fail to convey the true size of the animal compared to a human.
>>
>>4874010
>taller than the average human on earth
sorry manlet, you're too short to have good opinions
>>
>>4873992
I'm not the one who wants to see men everywhere in graphics
>>
well the males are taller so it would be better but isnt the average height 5'6
>>
>>4874010
>a 6 foot man (taller than the average human on earth)
No, the average human height is about that tall. Average brownie height would tank it if included, though.
>>
>>4874132
>>4874010
>>4874168
any "man" under 6' isnt human
>>
>>4874430
yes they are? you stupid? look at genetics of them lol still a man
>>
>>4874516
>subhuman cope detected
>>
>>4874632
im 6'3 you dumb fag
>>
File: 1703174440991774.jpg (62 KB, 421x421)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
>>4873266
I know what you're doing, degenerate.
>>
File: vwxfxvmvkhwz.jpg (50 KB, 700x577)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>4874681
>
>>
>>4874711
Explain
>>
>>4874820
He's into vore, specifically the "monsters or animals eating women" subset of vore.
>>
>>4874822
I'm OP. That sounds like a stretch if I say so myself. But I knew it was either going to be that or animals fucking women.
>>
>>4874832
Couldn't help but notice that you didn't deny it.
>>
>>4874835
If I did, would you believe me? If you were willing to change your mind, you should be asking why I'd rather have female models.
>>
>>4873266
>>4874010
The idea is to compare to a human.
>>
>>4874516
Height is mostly genetic, at least in the 1st world.
>>
>>4874844
Sounds like an admission of guilt to me.
>>
>>4874168
>>4875852
>>4874430
>>4874033
>t. Pablo Guadalupe Sanchez
>>
File: 1590594720530.jpg (36 KB, 320x304)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>
File: 1602707516859.jpg (28 KB, 627x366)
28 KB
28 KB JPG



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.