If you're white and can't get laid why not just get 10 nigger wives and bleach africa?
That's even worse.
>>21615695Why?
>>21615694I mean. America is minority white now, you can do this without buying a plane ticket
>swazilandenjoy aids
>>21615694This is why. That's a monkey, and you're encouraging bestiality.
>>21615696Because you're just contributing the Black birthrate and giving them more intelligence, which will invariably want to make them leave their country. Use a prostitute, where a condom. That's all there is to it.
>>21615694I'm darker than all 4 of those negresses
>>21615697Polygamy is still illegal
Given that a lowlift is 1000 to 1 at best and 100000 to 1 at worst, to argue superior genetic representation in the deep future you would have to at the very least have 1 thousand children by different protohominid females for a full 100% chance of outperforming 3 children by another that reached the top of human evolution. An argument might be made that if you can put a spin on the ball, then you could do it in as little as a hundred, but if you dice roll shit, then you'd have to get this up to ten thousand, or god help you 1 hundred thousand, for a parity evolution.Could be anywhere from 100 children, to ten thousand children to reach parity, depending on approach and details you can control.Your white DNA will be bare punching 7 stations over its category in those thousand people, however, by sheer numbers, and that evolution rewards a randomly isolated victory disproportionately, 100 kids by 100 women in the 3rd world plus positive spin, is an equal evolution, the sacrifice is that the top of the mountain doesn't get higher, but the sub-peaks get higher.
>>21615694But you'd need to bring a bro to double bleach them in 13 years
>>21615694I don't want to live in Africa.
Actually, thinking about it.The black women you impregnate from the 3rd world would have had to not had children with a black male and so your seed getting in fully displaces a black seed. Then confining the problem by only impregnating the women who would have had black children and did, because they had children by you, would be more direct spin on positive evolution, since 100 bad DNA's went away with the introduction of 1 good DNA that got copied a hundred times.Fuck, that's optimal strat. But again, thousand to 1 to reach parity.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUf-odtFiJE
>>21615700The race is determined by the man so its not contributing to the black birthrate
>>21615700Based escort enjoyer
>>21615694If you're going to racemix it's gotta be Asian women. Idk how people are attracted to black women.
>>21615694>try trad asi… African women No.
because whites are pink and recessive and dominated by their female halfwomen require a bull not piglet
>>21615711Yes. The people who literally conquered the entire planet and currently have the means to reduce all of the cities of man to radioactive rubble in under an hour are "dominated by their female half."
