Why don't you move to San Francisco?It's like a cheat code to becoming a top 1% earner in the USA >b-but the cost of living!! Who gives a fuck when you are making $150,000?
I think you're flipping correlation and causation. People who are top 1% earners in the USA are moving to San Francisco for work, moving to San Francisco doesn't transform you into a top earner.
>>58417854it's not about how much you earn but how much you keep you vanity metric retard also enjoy getting mugged by crackhead niggers
I'd rather make half of that and work remotely to live wherever I want
>>58417854SF would be such a nice city if they rounded up all the homeless and sent them off to concentration camps
>>58417854>when you are making $150,000and paying 60% of that in taxlol
>>58417913nah, keep the homeless and send all politicians instead
>>58417854>Median income below low income in LA countyI guess most people are poor there.
>>58418279wait so does that mean that LA basically has millions of super poor people, then a few ultra-rich people causing the average to be high?
>>58418286Most people in LA county are homeless or illegal, so probably. All the middle class are moving out.
>>58418279where did you find that pic?can you post one for NYC?
>>58418310https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/grants-and-funding/income-limits-2023.pdfIt's just California.
>>58417854I'm already making that much money in an area where houses don't cost $1.5 million and gas is $6/gal.
>>58418340but you don't live in the most cultured and intellectual place in the world
>>58417854I make 150k in the northeast for way cheaper. I just need to go to d.c for worte even now and then
>>58417985
>>58417854150K is poverty tier in the bay area, you will literally be saving nothing>4K+ rent unless you want to spend 3+ hours per day commuting or living in a pod>40% effective tax rate>all the benefits of living their are expensive, if you don't use them to save you might as well just live somewhere cheaperit makes no sense to move there unless you are making 300K+, even then you would probably be better off taking less to work remote and work on a side business. At most do 2-4 years there to network and get established then leave
>>58420259whoever told you that is lying to you rent is not that bad in the bay area its like the same price or less than every other major city in the usa I find SF to be cheaper than Seattle
>>58420259That leaves you 42k after rent and taxes for food bills transport entertainment etc. If you can't save at minimum 1k a month out of that you're an absolute retard.
>>58420275enjoy never having kids or owning a house, not possible on 150K. SF is the test bed for bug society and how far they can take things and have people still live with it>>58420268I work in tech and have run the numbers, only way I'd move to SF/bay area instead of working remote is if I get more than 2x my current income>more than 1BR apartments are 4K+>public schools are shit, so need expensive private schools>taxesquality of life is shit in the Bay Area unless you are making 500K+
>>58420292>public schools are shitsome of the best public schools in the country (and thus the world) are in the bay area, there are school districts here that are so competitive that chinese millionaires buy homes in those areas just to send their kids herewoodside high school for example yes, the taxes are high. they are higher than seattle and that is a legitimate problem that needs to be addressed, considering the city governments in the bay area are filled with literal criminal scum faggots who give the money to their friends in non-profits. doesn't change that the bay area is the best place to be in the world for people who want to change the world right now
>>58420300>>58419818>the best place to be in the world for people who want to change the world right now>but you don't live in the most cultured and intellectual place in the worldso great you've got to make a thread defending it and coping, do you work for SF tourism or something? SF just had a huge commercial building sell at a 75% loss because nobody is investing there, you fags are living off what libertarians and conservatives built over the previous 50 years in tech and you killed it within 10 years of hijacking control
>>58420300What about all the live syringes and toxic street feces?
>>58420354don't care stop being poor then its not a problem
>>58417854>Who gives a fuck when you are making $150,000?150,000 a year? don't fuck with me faggot, you can make that kind of money in 2 months doing copytrade or investing in XRM, SUPER or ETH.
>>58422249>crypto shilling grow up you have no money
>>58422249>crypto
>>58422249>2 months>ETHin what universe you can do that in 2 months with ETH
>>58417854Correlation does not imply causation. Just because rich people own Ferraris doesn't mean buying a Ferrari will make you rich. Just because 1% earners are living there, doesn't mean you'll become a 1% earner. They became a 1% earner first, before moving there.
>>58420268> rent is not that bad in the bay areaIt's not that bad if you are willing to live among the crackheads in the tenderloin, the squattemalans and mexican cartels in the mission, or the faggots in the castro. If you want a nice neighborhood, you're gonna pay extra. SF can be VERY nice, among the top cities in the US, but don't expect it to be cheap.
>>58417854>ayooo just move there first and then look for a 150k jobtoppest 1% retard take
>>58422368you can find cheap rent basically anywhere in the bay area