Bitcoin is not quantum resistant
>>58689933My massive power schlong is quantum resistant.
>>58689933Omg did you see the heckin gold plates and glass tubes bro? Quantum computing is soooo cool!!
>>58689933$FrogCat onsol is
quantum computers don't even exist
>>58689933Your mom is not my cock resistant
>>58690612/thread
>>58689933and you're not a computer scientist no one cares, fat
shitoshi's coins will move in the next 20 years
Sp-sp-spooky action fr-from a distance??
>>58690872probably. who knows if they can actually scale that shit. rn it's pitiful.
>>58689933Truth.I don't know why maxicels are so emotionally attached to BTC (the first crypto) somehow being the perfect cryptocurrency for the rest of time.
>>58691004>what is a software and why does it changes
>>58691050BTC changes are extremely hard, it's changed exceptionally little over 16 years as a piece of software. Especially comparing to chains that are designed to be upgradable.
>>58689933That’s correct. Bitcoin will last until the first quantum computer starts working even half decently. Probably 5 years until BTC is history.
it's been over a decade and the bitcoin community still has no post-quantum plan
>>58689933This is not the only weak point, a very efficient AI would break BTC.
>>58689933it's still the thing that keeps my bags alive, and also what keeps me locked in here, I better not say anything, I don't want to get my $trump screwed again
QAN is
>>58694060If Bitcoin dips, I'm loading up on more AAST, easy peasy.
>>58692379what would you recommend past btc
>>586899334chan is not faggot resistant
>>58692473>no explanation how, just repeats the same npc bullshit over and over.>does not understand how AI works>does not understand how bitcoin worksok bro.
>>58694359Fact.
QR migration is not BTC specific, QC are still decades away, the "1000" qubit QCs aren't high quality qubits so are practically worthless. Cry, seethe, dilate
>>58692332That's a good thing in trustless money, slavemind
>>58695123all it takes is one breakthrough in materials science and that timeline speeds up very quickly. better to act preemptively than be forced to react because you blew it off
>>58695136> all it takes is one breakthrough in materials science SQUAREDCorrect.
>>58689933The mere existence of privacy preserving haircomb on the bitcoin chain disproves your theory
I've seen some quantum resistant token already back in january 2018, don't know what became of those.
>>58695136>but what if magic?!QR migration is not BTC specificQR migration is not BTC specificQR migration is not BTC specificIf magic breakthrough happened tomorrow it would still take years to scale to meaningful QCs, migration would take less than a year in a needs-must scenario, any crash caused by sudden advances in QC would be a fantastic buying opportunity, anyway
>>58695388the more you spam a line the more it seems like cope. it's way easier for centralized systems to migrate (some already have) and bitcoin has its unique challenges with no clear solution. satoshi's coins, for instance, for which all of the public keys are visible and which cannot be accessed through conventional means. how will you migrate them?
>>58695453>t. mindless followerOrganic systems are infinity more robust to significant change. In a "magic happens" scenario we'd fork to a "no Satoshi coins" chain, this fork would dominate as it would be more desirable than one where his coins are claimed by the crackers. In a realistic scenario, QR wallets would be added, a migration timeline would be developed, and after migration old wallets would no longer valid. Easy peasy.
>>58695483>we'll just censor satoshi's coinslol
quantum computing is science fiction just shut up
>>58692379>5 years
>>58695483>t. typical communist
>>58689933Who's still wasting time and money when onchain SUMMER is fucking destroying every base shitcoin
>>58695576Yes. Needs-must, faggot. >>58695817>uhh sorry sweetie but a completely free market in trustless money is communism, ok?!Mentally ill statist slavemind
>>58692379categorically false, if quantum computers can break it quantum computers can secure it
>>58692332Because the refusal to just upheave it imbues trust. It's successful because it's basically unchanged. If it needed to be quantum resistant they would do it.
>>58692379You realize quantum tech is well beyond what we think it is.
Various quantum computers are already online and nothing happened.
