NO DIVVY, NO BUY
>>58695506actual ignoramus. dividends are a net negative because they're taxed at a higher rate.
>>58695619They are taxed at a qualified rate (most of the time)
i always thought stocks that didnt pay out a dividend were a scam
>>58695758I think the idea is the might pay one out eventually
>>58695758>>58695918Yeah, it's okay to buy stock in a company that is focusing on growing and using all their profits to help grow, but if a company never pays dividends then at some point it's just a ponzi scheme.
>>58695506NO DIV-VY NO BUY