chainlink would be so great if it were coin and not an ethereum based token.
>>58697397that doesn't make any sense, but neither does LINK token's alleged right to exist. It's quite literally and 100% unironically not needed.
>>58697397tits are too big
>>58697403and? if I saw you IRL I would say the same thing
>>58697421smthnsmthn saggytitts after 30 buy donut!
they are working on an l1. they are also working on blockchain gaming. apparently also real staking, lol
>>58697402thispeople talk about if link is "needed"but is link even morally justified in existing?this is an important question to answer
>>58697397don't say this out loud to the lonkies
>>58697397Someone post the anime donut Pic please
>>58699583kekEither way, it will be trash.I prefer RWA to Oracle as it stands. I will secure even more RWA, specifically Ondo, Dua, and a few others, rather than buying LINK. I know those LINKtards will hate me for this. Do I give a fk? Hell no.
why do jeets dickride link to shill their garbage? Is it because all non-whites are retards?
but then it would be needed instead of a scam ico token