>current AI models require as much electricity as a small city >to make more powerful models the companies making AI will need more electricity>microsoft already unironically trying to plug their computer to a nuclear reactorhow do we profit?
TEE CEE CEE
>>58697900that isn't enough for AI, human batteries could be a bigger play for profits
>>58697959Dumb. this is a mind brain washed by Warner Brothers
>>58697959>dude just like in the movies!!! this is so friggin epic :D
>>58697900Orbital supercomputers in sunsynchronous orbit around our planet with constant solar power input.
>>58697902how do I buy this?
>>58697900DePIN and spatial computing are solutions for AI progress. Just look at the stuff posemesh is doing
>>58697900yo putting money on energy is not a bad idea. should we put money on nuclear or green energy or both?>>58697902why do retards here always have to answer in the form of a riddle? if i google "tcc energy" or "tcc electricity" i get something called "tcc group holdings - green energy"is that what you are talking about? how do i put money on this shit?>>58698414>>58699208guys pretty sure if you send a computer to space it would explode because it would overheat to death
>>58697900With any luck, fusion. Maybe also mini fission reactors.
>>58697900If you're serious with that, it's obviously SMRs. There are soon few companies in licensing phase. I hold NuScale.
Oil
>>58699601your mom must be proud of how smart you are.spatial computing is a game changer and since you don't know shit about it would be best to google it
>>58699601>nuclearhow? uranium miners? I don't think you can long nuclear that easily>green energyyou definitely shouldn't do that...if demand for total energy goes up the green transition bs is donezo...lots of political factors involved too (and subsidies of course)
>>58700172I just bought Nuscale.. what am I in for?
