i need a high iq narrative for crypto i can cast the spellim Allah
>>58771203Look at the DePIN narrative. There will be so many good launces this summer, Grass, Silencio, posemesh...
its done - crapto died with the eth zoomer cancer that came in 2015, was artificially kept alive with mlm, ponzi and pyramid shit and lost its entire legitimating base because of a dogeshit peddling socialist pretending to be a "free peach" retard that got courted by every scammer from Delhi to New Jersey.larry doesnt give it legitimation, political party dictatorships don't give it legitimation, some cheap uninspired marketing shit doesnt give it legitimation - the only narrative for crapto databases and cbdc copy paste that remains is to be forgotten and disappear in obscurity, dying with a fart, ignored by 99.999% of humans being an in-joke for a niche of nerds
>>58772443you are going to hell
>>58771203>34%just stay in spot nigga and hold
>>58771203Quantum tech is the only high IQ narrative. QAN and Algo are pure gold
>>58771203NFT's are dead, meme tokens and such aren't really going to grow. Unfortunately I think "the" narrative is still the same, boring one that's been around since 2015 or so - solving the crypto trilemma. It doesn't go away, it's just that the protocols which claimed to solve it in previous cycles slowly get debunked (mostly along decentralisation criteria) or people lose faith in them, so a new set of charlatans spring up to claim to have solved it in a new way. E.g. KASPA. This cycle will just be about finding newer, more compelling and/or novel narratives that address this problem.At first, with litecoin or bitcoin cash, and the like, all they did was copy and paste BTC abd recalibrate parameters a bit (block size, minutes per block etc... or in the case of XRP reducing the number of nodes). Next cycle we had more sophisticated set of protocols that aimed for more efficiency, optimisation, foregoing UTXO paradigm, adding smart contracts. Eth was the most successful. Halfway through the last cycle they started talking about sharding, and that's still on ETH's roadmap and shilled by other solutions this cycle. Many protocols already have it, and it doesn't seem to be the elixir they claimed. An emerging (easier) alternative to sharding is just parallel transactions. That's what's really being seen in the prolific alts this time around, so far like KASPA. So, be educated, know a bit about crypto protocols so that you can understand the tech a little bit, and throw out the boring, recycled ideas, find the newer, convincing ones
>>58772443This>>58775152Nigger, the sad rest of scammers and ponzi players don't give a damn about technical unsolutions or the pretending to "solve" a physical impossible to solve problem. Anyway, crypto won't grow ever again. There is no "untapped" liquidity faucet to dig into anymore, no new people coming. Thank Elon Musk for having given crypto in its entirety the dead blow
>>58775207>ponzi players don't give a damn about technical unsolutions or the pretending to "solve" a physical impossible to solve problem. Many of them don't care in the short term, but purely out of self interest enough of them care, over the long term, to reach a critical enough mass to eventually punish those protocols that don't deliver what they claim. It's out of self interest because they themselves learn to see the benefits of and desire, for their own money, decentralization, privacy, and performance.For example ETH has become very difficult to run a node on, they gave up POW and became POS and OFAC-compliant (US regulator can censor transactions it doesn't like, blacklist wallets etc), and Vitali came out saying the dream of anyone being able to run a node or participate in the network was just too idealistic and old fashioned. ETH has failed to pump through loads of bullish news, and the biggest degens, who will gamble on any memecoin, tend to speak with their actions what they won't say with their words, and move their wealth off that chain. There's also just the novelty aspect, people want something new, some new tech. Even if they don't care about it personally. Basically what I'm saying is, you can't just go and start your own crypto now by copying and pasting some existing project and generating some word-salad white paper about solving the trilemma. It doesn't work anymore. People need the novelty of feasible-sounding, innovative new solutions (or atttempted solutions) with stuff being demonstrated in test nets. So my response to the OP was that it is still a narrative that matters. >Anyway, crypto won't grow ever again. There is no "untapped" liquidity faucet to dig into anymore, no new people coming.This has been foretold many times over many years. Bitcoin is dead. Yet we're still close to all time highs
