stake.link is about the run of out LINK staked by sdl holders (who get priority)so anyone can get link into v0.2 easy
>>58776643how much is t roi?
>>58776643is the priority pool at zero or have the horselords just run out of chainlink?
>>58776643you niggers spend all day every day telling me chainlink is worthless and a scam, and yet you want me to buy a secondary token that is entirely dependent on the success of chainlink? fuck off
>>587766496.7%>>58776651priority pool still has 140k but it's just that sdl stakers are running out of link to stakethat means that everyone's link will be staked>>58776659the post is saying the opposite - now you now don't need SDL to get access to their staking
>>58776677ah I see. but of the holders in that 140k, if any of them buy and lock any SDL whatsoever, their LINK gets priority over the rest
>>58776677>6.7%monthly?
>>58776659Its one guy
>>58776699yes truebut looking like people without sdl will get link staked anyway due to how much the protocol is staking currently. sdl hodlers only have so much link>>58776709annual, it's normally 4.5%stake.link 2.2% higher
>>58776659Not even Johnny wants you to purchase his token. It serves no purpose. There's no reason to buy it.
>>58776933staking sdl gets link rewardsalso is going to provide metis rewards soon too:https://ceg.vote/t/lst-proposal-stake-link/2818
>>58776933Kind of interesting how he doesnt mention LPL anymore in public. The private invite only LPL chuddie kiddo groups are literally out of control. Based! I.Y.K.Y.K.
>>58777000Well they play the same "you can use sdl to get priority staking for your metis or you can just wait and get in eventually" argument?
>>58777038umm i assume so? as that's good for the sdl stakers, they get priority and they get a cut of the link and metis staked... so the more staked the betterthen anytime they want to stake they can do so immediately>>58777026well lpl doesn't exist... but they have redeemed... same supply, if you didn't sell then got same amount of sdl as lplactually more as there's another airdrop coming which will reward those who staked
>>58777364>SAAAR DO NOT DO THE REDEEM!!!>WHY YOU REDEEM!!!Nice try fuddie but we have IDs here
I’m certain you guys have brains like fucking goldfish. Think back to how much link was lost due to people staking through services like this and bancor and a whole long list of other shitty protocols.Stop giving these fucking criminals your link and trust nothing but official staking, otherwise you will 100% lose your bags
>>587766776.7% split between all SDL holders. Not to mention not all of the apy is in link. The majority of the apy is in SDL token, which is complete dog shit. Thats not even taking into consideration that chainlink is another cycle away from having anything of value.
>>58778960Generally I agree with this, especially when the yield that is promised is higher than the "native" yield of whatever asset is at stake because there is no free lunch. There are some legit yields but they are mostly from lending which is at an explicit risk, especially a liquidity risk. But yeah when I hear "7% APY" and I know the OG is 4.2% or 5% without that node cut, then it just means there is some risk in that system that is not accounted for, same thing with Bancor.
>>587789606.7% is the apy for stLINK, not SDL. and it's paid in stLINK. >>58779122the rate is higher because node operators have a separate pool with a higher reward rate, as set by Chainlink Labs when they created the staking contract. the stLINK reward rate is a blend of the node operator pool rewards and the community pool rewards
>>58779151i noticed that you didnt correct me on chainlink not producing anything of value this cycle. Since SDL is a derivative of that then SDL is just another shitcoin stacked on top of the king shitcoin that is chainlink
>>58779488so then you were completely wrong in your statement about returns? well donein terms of value, it doesn't really matter as staking doesn't have anything to do with thatcll is using 1.9m link of their supply each year to distribute to stakers, they have 400m link left>>58779122it's pretty much a free lunch as it all comes from chainlink's treasury. better for it to go us than sold into the marketthe rate is higher as it also draws link from the allocation of 15 of the top chainlink nodes
>>58780325>staking doesnt matter>im happy with my gibbsfaggot the gibbs are diluting everyone too. And staking does matter, its the only thing that does matter and the fat ass wants to do everything else but that
>>58780545Check the secret and uber based LPL chuddie kiddo discord anon you'll be pleasantly surprised LPL huh how you doing based LPL chuddie kiddos
>>58780545dude how retarded are you? in no way in chainlink ready for real staking, that's years offchainlink is ADDING SEVENTY MILLION TOKENS a year to the supply and you're worried about less than 2m going to us... retard
>>58781334thank you for conceding my point. if staking is years of then there is no reason to buy chainlink and the shitcoin variation the is SDL
>>58776659>>58776933>>58778934>>58779122filtered
>>58781334why is supply still at 1B, same as launch in 2017?
i thought you guys said the pool was closed
>>58782099uhh obviously there is... speculation and eventual adoptiondo you really think eth is worth $3k? no, it's speculation and name recognitioni am more than happy waiting given the names that chainlink is working withsdl is a good hold as it gives a % of stLINK fees, just look at lido and reth. if/when chainlink takes off, a LSD is going to be important>>58783527that's total supply, i'm taking about circulating supply>>58783544it is as long as a sdl staker has some link queued
>>58783827>specuationm8 you speculate to make money. there is no upside to holding chainlink or sdl this cycle
>>58783843chainlink is long-term bag. we don't know when it will move but we know it will, otherwise you wouldn't have posted 5 times in this threadhave lots of other bags to sell in bull market thoughwill sell some sdl in peak bull though, i bought a lot around 10 cents
>>58783859>long term>cryptoyou really are going to lose it all m8
>>58783870the first step is to forgive yourselfyou were young, you were greedytake some good profit over the next 6 months-1 year and move onone speculative asset shouldn't be fucking you up this much(i t. sold half my link bag in 2021)
>>58776933i don't understand. stakers lost a lot of money (dollars) so far. why would anyone want this? is it the build rewards? you have to give it to the marketing genius that came up with that carrot. exactly what retail crypto idiots want, gambling on shitcoins, but without becoming a competitor selling away the liquidity of link tokens the marketing team advertised so hard for. genius
>>58783903i got rugged by linkpool too. im just doing my part and letting everyone know what both sergey and johnny had done faggot.
>>58784283do you have any lpl or sdl now?
>>58784283Once a based LPL chuddie kiddo always a based LPL chuddie kiddo stay based and LPL pilled fren
>>58784615nope. i consciously choose to not get involved with projects that steal from me. you called me greedy buy you're the one who is controlled by greed by buying SDL
