>Blah blah check priceWho cares, this market is filled with retards the entire thing is still driven on speculative retail hype and frankly it doesn't take much money to pump any of these shitcoins. Even 80% of /biz/ threads are filled with low IQs who don't understand the value prop of crypto at all.We have the CCIP 1.6 audit happening RIGHT NOW and ending in 9 days, probably with 1-2 months after 1.6 will launch which includes>Anyone can issue cross-chain tokens at the drop of a hat>Anyone can create token pools on CCIP>People can launch tokens without exposing themselves as the owner>tokens no longer travel through lanes but rather will have single on/off ramps per chain>CCIP contracts will no longer be tied to EVMAnd then in December the payment abstraction audit will be happening, ending early January.These 2 components are 2 of the "final" puzzle pieces for Chainlink to enable insane adoption at scale. And then we have regulatory clarity coming for banks who we know are all waiting to onboard and start issuing cross-chain tokens which can be utilized in complex smart contracts, CCIP the only interoperability protocol which allows this.2025 is going to be fucking bananas for this token. All of the shit we have been waiting for is actually happening. Fudsisters are going to be having extreme meltdowns left and right. This catalogue will be instead littered with "LOL I FUDDED CHAINLINK BUT WAS HOLDING 100K THE WHOLE TIME" threads.Unironically, I'm so excited for you guys.
>>59231757>best post on biz>board is silentits for this place but just starting for linkies im happy for you guys, i have a few link but never went all in. Can't imagine how rich you guys are going to be.
Linkdraked sucks every random cock he can find. There is no one gayerAlso, why are people not allowed to discuss sol tokens here? Seems a little weird you’re only allowed to push last cycle scams that only lose people money here
yeah, now let's pull up that chart baggie and check the price...AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHGHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHGAHHAGHAGHSGHASHASHAKek baggie
>>59231757Oh I didn't even mention the fact that LINK is now Trump-backed and Trump's DeFi platform is now dependent on LINK. Fucking insane.
>>59231757This makes me want to buy more LINK.
>>59231888On sol
>>59231757>And then in December the payment abstraction audit will be happening, ending early January. Funny how advocates said this wasn't needed as apparently Chainlink stealing all the fees for themselves wasn't an issue, just fud.But now that Sergey is releasing it advocates say its the last missing puzzle piece.You should get on your knees and suck all fudders cock little drakey
>>59231757>People can launch tokens without exposing themselves as the ownerWheres the post/tutorial on how to do this? Or sauce for more info?
>>59231757I bought LINK on SOL thinking they were compatible until I read thisWhat do bros?
>>59232124it's a literal shitcoin most likely continued fud ops jump crypto rug pull attacksfits the MO
sir gay fat man stinky poo poo
>>59231757>>592277732/3 useful posts on /biz/ atm. The 3rd is the /biz/ activity one, which is bullish because it looks like btc/link chart, the reversal will be amazing. Non /biz/ boards will come here to cope
>>59231888Checked
>>59231921Well you see at that point arbitrum was the last piece and the previous last piece to that was staking and then the last last piece was ccip. The important thing is that you never sell when all these last pieces are coming out.
I don't ever see CCIP becoming a launchpad for cross-chain meme/shitcoins. Chainlink is too "serious business" to ever support this kind of tomfoolery even though ironically this is the only thing that could boost CCIP usage without banking institutions "maybe in 2050". And if it did occur, it would be very funny to imagine, that any shitcoin launched via CCIP, would require 1% of the supply to be given to stakers. 99% of shitcoins die but that 1% could also mean the next x1000 shitcoin.
>>59233257>I don't ever see CCIP becoming a launchpad for cross-chain meme/shitcoinThe point is now it's much easier and your meme coin can be bigger because of multichain and less liquidity fragmentation
>>59233530But there is no real organic meme coins, all the coins that take off are actually VC mafia washtrading astro turfing, and the mafia won't ever acknowledging CCIP when they push their own bridges and own stakes in their own silo'd chains. Like currently SOL memecoins are taking off because they're propped up by SOL stakeholders. They don't want cross-chain coins, they don't want neutrality, they want to keep milking the "my chain vs your chain war" narratives. You wrongly assume CCIP's improvements will be embraced by the market, when all it gets is resistance.
>>59231757>Blah blah tokens tokens tokensNobody here cares about DeFi stuff because the real money is in TradFi.Unfortunately, it seems you haven’t noticed that the fatman screwed us over when he settled on CCIP using flat fees of just $0.25.EVEN IF WE GOT 100% OF SWIFT MESSAGES, the token would only pump to about $91 (see picrel) if CCIP fees remain flat. We could make it with % based fees but that seems to be to expensive fo banks (banks want to save money, not pay more than they are currently paying).Why do you think ETH has been struggling against the market since the merge? Do you really think a protocol being 'cheap' is a good thing? Lol.>2025 is going to be fucking bananas for this tokenYou wish. Swift live trials are set to end in Q4 2025, just in time for the crypto bear market. Coincidence? Nope. The best news ever for LINK will come when BTC gigacrashes again, so no one will pay attention. Sound familiar?
>>59231921It wasn't an issue because Chainlink said from the very start that the payment abstraction layer would be coming.
>>59233963And it never came and was never mentioned, which was an issue. Thanks to fudders for sticking to their guns and reminding CLL that they had to deliver that. Advocates were so complacent they were afraid of bringing that up, they would try to shut down anyone mentioning this, they're cowards.
>>59234090>it never cameWhat? It's being finalized right now. It was always coming.>was never mentionedExcept of course it was.
>>59234281You don't get it anon. It's obvious they only started working on it the moment us fuddies were making a stink on /biz/ and Twitter, and shortly after that it was finished already! Insane how fast we booked results. I never knew project management was this easy :^)
>>59233172How does bny and blackrock make all these blockchains interoperate?https://securitize.io/learn/press/blackRock-launches-new-buidl-share-classes-across-multiple-blockchainsi don't understand because chainlink is always talking about multi chain future usage but actual real multi chain products today aren't using it
>>59234373The press release says nothing about them interoperating.>>59234312kek
>>59234486hence why i asked, how are they interoperating?considering the fund is going to be on several different blockchains
>>59234627>how are they interoperating?Who says they are?
WE ARE ALL IN THIS NIGHTMARE TOGETHERDO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF NEGATIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE NEGATIVE THOUGHT!THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $0 EASILY!HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!!!!!
>>59231825Because nobody gives a shit about any LINK cope so long as Sergey dumps billions of dollars worth of link constantly.Its dead in the water. No speculation = no valuation as link is vapourware.
>>59234923You're retarded. Like physiologically retarded.Sui for instance hopped over Link in the rankings and did a 7x these past few weeks, all while dumping way more than Sergey.Seriously, get yourself checked out.
>>59234687so it's multi chain operable, as per the press release, and chainlink isn't actually needed. you can't tell me that isn't interesting.
>>59235464>it's multi chain operable, as per the press releaseThe press release doesn't say that.
>>59235237The irony of a guy that has missed the entire bullrun calling someone else dumb. You could have picked 50 random people and told them to buy a few cryptos this year and none of them wouldve performed less than youPsa to all - becoming emotionally attached to an altcoin is a recipe for disaster. Dont make the same mistake she did. I was going to say you’ll end up like cardano cult but even they mog weaklink
>>59235237Because people are happy to speculate on those projects because they aren’t piles of shit known for dumping on their investors and delivering nothing and never pumping you fucking retard.Its called supply and demand. They have demand: link has none
>>59231757>These 2 components are 2 of the "final" puzzle pieces for Chainlink to enable insane adoption at scale.no its not faggot. CLL has a track record of doint beta versions and slow role outs. They are going to milk this shit for as long as they can
>>59231867and there's a Trump nft on galaxis, this is insane
>>59235237>Sui for instance hopped over Link in the rankings and did a 7x these past few weeks,Yeah, the best decision I made was selling last year for SOL and then selling the rest this year for SUI at $0.78, as well as participating in the Peaq token sale on CoinList. I'm holding in profit. idgaf about anyone's opinion anymore on link.
>>59235521>>These 2 components are 2 of the "final" puzzle pieces for Chainlink to enable insane adoption at scale.We wish this could be the case, but how long can we wait to be milked of the little we have?
>>59235493>they aren’t piles of shit known for dumping on their investorsI just told you that Sui dumped a lot more on their investors than Sergey.Sui is dumping 2-3x more than Sergey in fact.Again: get yourself checked out. You are clearly not well.
>>59235483>missed the entire bullrun>not even 2025 yetYou people are utter fucking retards
there's literally no reason to hold it until something happens thobtcSuiSolD.o.g.eBonkADAPepeXLMKaspathese are all pumping currently and will do so until februari-march, why would anyone waste their stacks on holding a coin that MAY pump in 2025, but late into 2025 in that case.anyone with half a brain would just hold a better coin until something FINALLY happens with link, until then token not needed or wanted.
>>59235568Nobody cares though, so it pumps. Again: you don’t understand supply and demand.Sui has demand, link does not.Link has a reputation for never pumping, never delivering, 2 more weeks, and being dumped by sergey. This means no demand = dumpsSui doesn’t have that reputation, so it seems plenty of demand = pumpExplain to me what supply and demand is and how it relates to both those tokens.You cant become you are an uneducated loser who is unemployed or seldom employed, lives in whatever backwards town you were born in with mommy and daddy and have little life experience despite a likely advancing age.I cant believe you spend your time seething about how much other projects dump their tokens compared to Sergey yet you cant understand how supply and demand works lmao.Get your head checked
>>59235604Literally all the things you mentioned are moot except for: >never pumpingThat's all it is. Stop a coin from pumping, and it will never pump again. Unlucky BTC dumps made sure LINK dropped off of the radar of pretty much the whole crypto space, because all that matters is hype and catching pumps. It's a self fulfilling prophecy at this point, until it reverses.
>>59235604You said Sui pumped because they didn't dump on their investors.getyourselfcheckedoutYou're mentally unwell.
>>59235599Well-stated observation. I wish more people would take this seriously. Imagine holding all these, especially SOL and SUI, earlier this year.I plan to sell my link for Yelay and Kaspa soon.
How do you compare Wormhole to CCIP? I'm interested in the RWA space and seeing that Securitize is using wormhole. I know CCIP has a different focus but they are both cross chain infra.
>>59235656Guess what?You are poor. Im not.You baghold link. I dont.You seethe on biz at people explaining why you wont make money holding link. I dont.You invent reasons your “investment” sucks and why others unfairly moon while still holding and being poor. I dont.Get over yourself loser Btw, you are objectively a loser as you hold LINK
>>59236092>explaining why you wont make money holding linkThat's the thing: the explanation you keep spamming year after year doesn't make sense.
>>59232786That's all I want, a yacht.
The average American has a reading comprehension of a 8th grader. Thats what you witness here regularly.
>>59233721DeFi will grow, a lot. Part of what Chainlink & CCIP enables is banks to offer completely new derivatives and tokenized baskets which will also expand the tradfi market. And then you're not considering staking collateral which is the final final piece of this puzzle. When staking goes live legit, that's end game. You then will see supply shrink extraordinarily.>>59234373BUDIL is a test fund and was entrusted to Securitize who is a Jump pawn and does not have the fund's best interest at heart. That sort of "interoperability" is extraordinarily limited and will keep BUIDL walled off. There are less than 100 total shareholders with only $500 AUM. Not too concerning.>>59235521>role outskek>>59235599There are literally millions of tokens, anon. Yes, you can throw a dart at the top 200 and might get lucky in the current casino. Or you can just bet on the long term. There are less than 5 projects in the top 100 actually building infra of value right now. Or you can chase things that already pumped instead of identifying outliers which are vastly undervalued.
>>59231757I feel like we've been waiting for the trigger to the big green candle for years and with every new piece of tech released the uptake is very low despite how good it sounds in theory.So yeah, it sounds good but I'm not counting my chickens. My ducks are not in a row.If someone is launching on AOL they can control the volume more easily than cross chain, so would that really be attractive to a shit coin dev to start via CCIP? Legit ones sure but others not so much and it's hard to know how many projects are legit in any way.I dunno, just very demoralised but doesn't mean I'm selling. We'll get the staking payout in a few weeks so that's something I guess.
>>59235718Wormhole has been hacked several times. It’s an inferior product.
>>59231757Bump
>>59231757>two more weeks!>two more months!>two more years!>two more decades!
JUST TELL ME WHAT PRICE TO SELL AT I DONT WANT TO HOLD THROUGH ANOTHER BEAR MARKET
>>59239798Sell if $100 to avoid the bear market.But u will miss the run up to $1k and regret for life
>>59233721Yes flat fees, everyone is waiting for the next troll guarding the tollbridge on the information highway. Institutions cheering the idea of giving away the keys to their money making machine to a russian who uses pseudo intellectual mumbo jumbo to convince them they need his ''solution''.
