https://warosu.org/biz/thread/58439987https://warosu.org/biz/thread/58717206https://warosu.org/biz/thread/58917732https://warosu.org/biz/thread/59166963congrats linkies, im a bit disappointed the drama didn't continue longer, I was expecting to make this post next year. 5 year trend officially reversed and confirmed. to anyone on the sideline, its time to bet the farm on LINK, push all in and swingies get back in immedietly. to the fudsisters, call out when this thing crabs for the next couple weeks to a month, but severe breakout is imminent. trolling link is coming to an end. to any cucks who will say "LOL TA", you know the fundamentals are also behind LINK as well. this coin is legitimately a world beater. Expect not just ETH but BTC to get flipped. I look forward to part 6. Ill see you guys on the yacht. To the anons posting math, appreciate you guys. This boards been through enough, people need to see its finally time. when the dust settles, dont forget where you came from, dont become one of them.“Blessed are the neet, for they shall inherit the earth” Matthew 5:5
>>59237592I will actually grab a bit of a LINK bag in december when eth capitulates and so does LINK dump. I'm priced out of AVAX for now so LINK will do. it's going to 44 this bullrun btw
Hello anon, what are your unironic price targets for 2025 and when do we sell, assuming we must? Im thinking of letting go of 500 LINK from my staking rewards.
I bought this at 40 lol
for me its link on solana
>>59237592I think we’ll be back at 18 within a few days
>>59237623this is a hard question honestly, i have a good life outside LINK, so I will be fine to hold to unrealistic numbers. Im in the same boat thinking of getting rid of staking rewards as well. however, fear is if they can fully implement LINK into financial structures, selling any before the god candle will be painful.look at your personal finances, budgeting anon. how much do you need this money? i think when you can sell 10% for an amount you are happy with, thats your exit price. I dont think its copium, $81k is FUD
>>59237684I dont NEED any to be honest. Its just a way of gauging one another's projections. My house is paid for, but a nice watch would be great, so would be a week long ski trip to Japan. But I agree. On a second thought maybe selling staking rewards before the full liftoff can be our 10,000 BTC pizza.
>>59237884Meant for >>59237824
>>59237592Yeah im not holding my breath, i have seen a million posts like this over the years. I will see it when i believe it
>>59237592The feigned calm collected demanor is a way better tactic than sending out obese losers to write emotional buzzword posts, but… its too little too late at this point. It just doesnt work anymore. The market moved on kid. Also there’s a few tells in your post that reveal you are absolutely BOILING watching your cult miss the bullTHE Cuckolds of crypto
Ok, so I'll take the opportunity and ask here. There is something that has me worried a little bit about link. And that is, who the fuck is approving the "chainlink adoption update" tweets? CL Labs is dropping the ball there and doing zero due diligence. They are putting the brand at risk. Not too long ago they posted a shitcoin utility project made by serial ruggers. I shit you not, you look it up in X and everyone knew it was a scam except CL it seems. To nobody's surprise, It totally hardrugged. I think it's common sense they shouldn't be posting on their main account low cap shitcoins
>>59238557Since the start Chainlink counts every single project which uses Chainlink services as any other, even if the name of the project is DoggyDogInuDeFi finance. As long as you use Chainlink services.I agree though they shouldn't even name those literal who projects, if they want to use Chainlink services sure but don't give them any platform to advertise through Chainlink
>>59238502>calling other people cucks when you're known for being such an unfuckable turkroach mouthbreather irl that you ended up being addicted to watching other people receive sexual gratification behind a screen, to the point where it gave you suicidal thoughts and you started posting about "peeling back the layers of your porn identity"classic Adem Kayser! do the other lads in the fuddie discord make fun of you to your face or behind your back? has your family staged an intervention for you yet?
>>59237592Cycle top $87 wagmi
We have already moved on stinkers. The days of being gaslit and cucked are over.
the question is when do i sell
when can I cease waging with 24k stinks staked?WHEN!?!
I've bumped it down to 3 days a week wagecucking but it's still 30+ hours a week some days 14 hours long, hard manual labor, GIVE ME SOME RESPITE FROM THE WAGEKEKERY
>>59237592I'm up 10x on SMCI calls in one day. Why would I ever waste my time with this shit?
>>59237592but what about the btc dumps then, whoever is doing those has limitless credit as they still are doing it in the btc bullrun
>>59238945because turning a 10x on $500 is nice for beer money but not much else
>>59238742Ewwww how ugly do you have to be to write like this. Id guess 2/10Im a huge Thomas fan btw. I must have liked 30 of his posts this month. Theyre great stuff bc of how hard they make you uglies cryAlso, check this out kid2020BTC $11,000Link $202024BTC $95,000Link $15THE Cuckolds of crypto
>>59238754This. Shitfluencers said $100 LINK last cycle and they were off by half.Now, they are saying $150-$200+ LINK so expect $75-100 which seems reasonable desu
>>59239535THE hammerhead shark of biz
