>just send the fees directly to me, it's fineHow the fuck did we let this happen??
THE cuckolds of crypto
>>59240305According to advocates there's nothing wrong with that
>>59240351There isn't anything wrong with that sweaty
>>59240305>How the fuck did we let this happen??Advocates are sheep that never stood up against this abuse
>>59240305>be me >friends hyping up LINK and ETH >ignore them, buy Kendu because chaos is more fun >turns out memes > fundamentals >mfw holding a dog coin is my retirement plan
>>59240500Imagine holders started coordinating dumps
the thing that burns fudgroids up most inside is that all of the talented linkies started nodes and have been making absolute bank ever since.did you see the node operator panel at smartcon? They were all super young zoomers. All millionaires.team "jerk off to anime and wait for Sergey to give them $100 mil" have been struggling, for unsurprising reasons.
>>59240609>all of the talented linkies started nodes and have been making absolute bank ever since.No. Only Sergey's friends that he whitelisted. All neet nodes are dead. But linkpool who rugpulled its users is still up because they're Sergey's buddies.So yes, fudders as you call them are a bit pissed off that Sergey is using their money to make his friends millionaires. You can think it's cool but good luck attracting new investors with this history.
>>59240305>>59240325>>59240351>>59240500Sergey in mid-2023:>while we're finishing the payment abstraction layer, fees will go into poolsFuddies in mid-2024:>hey wait a minute, the fees are going into pools???
>>59240636>seething because he couldn't put a professional veneer over his node operator application
copelinkies hubris was their downfall
>>59240636There are a whole bunch of absolute nobodies among the nodes. I bet a good chunk of them are from 2017-era /biz/raelis.
>>59240652>>while we're finishing the payment abstraction layer, fees will go into pools Oh yes? Are you sure about this? Can you point out to the pools receiving the price feed money?You're so stupid. Cuck.
>>59240500It's like HR, anon. They aren't there to advocate for you.
>>59240421>>59240609>>59240652Paid advocates spotted
>>59240698The price feed money?Are you retarded?
>>59240714>advocate feigns not to know CLL is collecting price feeds feesIt's so tiring
>>59240721Of course they're collecting price feed fees, they have been since the price feeds started in 2019.That's because they're the contract runners.And stop changing IPs. You're not fooling anyone, you alone make up 90% of the fud in this place.
>>59240609>jerk off to anime and wait for Sergey to give them $100 milThis is such a childish remark. Imagine Coca-Cola telling their shareholders well YOU make the fizzy drinks now you'll se how difficult making fizzy drink is!You have no idea how capitalism works. Link holders provide capital and expect a return in exchange. They have every right to tell the fat fuck not to mess with the network money.And before you say they're not shareholders have a look at your god in picrel.
>>59240730>Link holders provide capital and expect a returnyou seem to have confused your utility token for some sort of contractual dividend share
>>59240728>Of course they're collecting price feed feesHence the OP.>you alone make up 90% of the fud in this place.You are so delisuonal. You have no idea how pissed off holders are. Especially old school linkies. CLL is centralising the network a bit more everyday. And the advocate shilling on this board is disgusting.
>>59240733the utility token which has no utility for its holder except fake staking lol
>>59240733>Adhd riddled brain can't read the whole post with the attachment
>>59240743>Hence the OP.Chainlink are the contract runners for the price feeds. The fees HAVE TO go directly to them.>You have no idea how pissed off holders are.If "the holders" are so universally pissed off, then why do you have to resort to samefagging so hard every day?
>>59240751No idea what you're talking about. Haven't made a thread for days. Ip changing here because it's my setup.Also best proof every one is unhappy with current state of the network is the price. Everyone waiting for decentralisation before putting more in. All eyes are on CLL, they have to let the golden goose go not sure they'll have the balls. Muh contract operator you know very well since its them that's not an argument they have the subsidies it's not a fair competitive actor. This should be transparent.
>>59240305Chainlinkgod says it's a landgrab and i have more faith in him than a nameless anon
>>59240774;)love you buddy
>>59240769>Ip changing here because it's my setup.Yes exactly.You're always furiously switching IDs in every thread you make and participate in every day, just to prop up a fake sense of outrage.>best proof every one is unhappy with current state of the network is the priceYes, we're all angry at the price. Not at Sergey or Chainlink or the fundamentals.
>>59240305>>just send the fees directly to meUnbelievable
>>59240880Where else would they go, retard
>>59240887>how to handle payments trustlessly in cryptoThis confuses the advocate.
>>59240932And another new IP.Tell me how you would run the legacy price feeds by paying "trustlessly".
>>59240939>Tell me how you would pay "trustlessly" in cryptoAdvocates, everyone
>>59240972Tell me how this would work with the legacy price feeds.No need to get complicated, just say for instance where the users should send their fees.go
>>59240305Sell your tokens then bitch.
>>59240976Wait, advocates really think it's not possible to have a trustless payment system? You actually think it hasn't been implemented because it is technically difficult?Incredible.
>>59240998>Sell your tokens thenYes that's what everyone has been doing these past 4 years
>>59240698>You're so stupid. Cuck.The paid fudgroid lashes out in anger at this its pea sized, coom riddled brain cannot comprehend.Sad!
>>59241012Good, Sergey doesn't want any Indians to make it.
>>59241005And another new ID.No, it's not possible to have a trustless payment system for the legacy feeds.Prove me wrong, tell me in very basic terms how you would do it.
>>59241023I have absolutely no words to describe how stupid you are if your argument is that Chainlink, a multi billion dollar company specialised in building trustless or trust minimised contracts and software cannot develop a trustless system payment for their price feed payment system. I have no time to explain to you the very basic pricinples of crypto payments, and the trustless network on which they are built. The fact that you ask this as some sort of gotcha really says a lot about your knowledge of crypto.
>>59241041>cannot develop a trustless system payment for their price feedThere's a fundamental problem that cannot be overcome.You don't know what it is because all you have is your impotent rage and your VPN.
You should all bend the knee while you still have time.
