> bitcoin price soars> WWIII woes startWhy?
>WWIII startsIs that what the voices in your head are telling you?
>>59242933I haven't paid attention to any world news since the electionare we going to die soon?
>>59242933The last three years should have shown you that Russia isn't a threat to the West and they're incapable of doing anything serious.
>He fell for the WW3 fud
>>59242971bidan trying to start nuclear war with russia on his way out
>>59242933>Russia>WW3Bro, Russia is fucking weaker than Saddam Hussein's army in 1991, and they got fucking trashed.Russian nukes are a meme, half of that shit doesn't even work. Don't fall for their crude threats, they have no power.
>>59243297No, Anon, you don't understand, this huge state of Alcoholic Federation that can not capture some chernobyl radioactive village is a major threat cause a chess grandmaster Pitun had a half-hour meeting with Vinnie the Poo previously.
ww3 would be bullish for btc>>59243297and retarded hohols will probably make it reality because their leader is a jewish comedian
>>59243297Even a shithole like NK can build working nooks. Even if half of Russian nooks are duds we are fucked. Even if ONE works and detonates somewhere populated imagine the impact it would have on the world economy (at least in the short term). Realistically they could end us with only 10% or less of their arsenal working
>>59242998Russian motivation for the war is simply to preclude ukrainian induction into nato. If this happens they are surrounded on the western flank by all except belarus. Being at war in ukraine means they cannot join nato because no actual real niggas in nato want to war with russia.Russia is a mischievous threat to the west but mainly just wants to preserve their influence in the region, now under more pressure from china than ever. Russian worst nightmare: nato from the west, china from the east. They are partners in commerce but naturally compete for control in asia.Nato will never enter the war decisively unless the US leads it and US will never enter the war. Thus the war will never be fought by nato regulars.What will happen:Ukraine is not capable of winning at this point - insufficient personnel and materiel, russia will outlast them in attrition and is willing to. A peace agreement will be drawn that will concede territory to russia particularly in the southeast and entire eastern flank. They would like kyiv but may not get it. Ukraine will fuck this up a few times by using it as a means to regroup and launch offensives in conceded territory. Russia will do the same thing but they will use covert forces until they have a cause for action from overt ukrainian attacks. They will build influence, sow insurgency, and support revolutionary groups. They ultimately want to have control of the entire territory.Eventually a deal will settle, the new borders will be highly militarized probably forever, security situation will remain poor and this is a strategy to continue excluding ukraine from nato.
>>59243501Suck a dick russki
>>59243591Russian motivation for the war is just better naval/trade access to the black sea so they can't get hemmed in by the sea of azov. The rest is just the means to do it
>>59244745Wow youre actually low iq retard lmao were not in the 18th century you stupid mongoloid go play with your 100$ shitcoin portfolio kid
>>59243591Pretty alright assessment although a few problems.>Ukraine is not capable of winning at this point Neither is Russia.>insufficient personnel and materiel, russia will outlast them in attrition and is willing toUkraine is more willing to go much further than Russians to outlast them. Russian materiel is expended at a much higher rate with very little to show for it. At their rate it would take decades to achieve any war goal. >A peace agreement will be drawn that will concede territory to russiaThere's no reality where Ukraine ever makes a peace deal that concedes territory. >They will build influence, sow insurgency, and support revolutionary groups.This is even more fantasy, if there's any serious insurgency it will be in the occupied territory. >the new borders will be highly militarized probably foreverRussia would never agree to this. They want Ukraine to disarm their army BEFORE even coming to the negotiating table. Basically leaving the whole frontline undefended and demand that Ukraine dismantle their whole fighting capability as part of the "peace" deal. It's a complete joke that's never happening.
This entire thread had the reading comprehension of a 2nd grader.
>>59244777>overaggressive bullshit posturing>thinking land and access to natural ports isn't importantOh shit, you're right I forgot we have teleportation tech nowI accept (You)re concession that you will deliver with another expletive filled projection post>>59244824I think you might be missing their pointRussia is essentially holding Ukraine hostage by continuing a war NATO has no designs on getting personally involvedIs Russia losing MASSIVE amounts of resources? Definitely. Is the continued war effort costing heavy morale damage to Ukraine and financial burden to NATO (specifically the us)? Also definitely. Russia is in a better position to continue their losses to push NATO into forcing Ukraine to sue for peace. If they capitulated now, they would not only lose to NATO, they would get dominated by China
>>59244824Ua may be more willing but doesn't have the actual capability. This is even more grim if/when foreign assistance stops. I happen to be a knower. If ua refuses to concede territory, the war will simply not stop and they will continue to take losses. This increasingly is unpopular and viewed as a sort of vietnam situation. However universally the thought is to accept an unfavorable peace agreement "for now" and attempt to retake the land later. They will not have a choice. An arrangement was nearly reached already but ua blew their load on the cease fire too early and fucked it.On insurgent groups and other weirdos. This is a kind of popular thing in ua. Not important to go into it, call them separatists, nationalists, whatever.
btc made war obsolete
>>59242933GET A FUCKING PET ROCK HOLDING ROCKYIT'S ADORABLEEND WWIIITHAT'S ALL
>>59242933it's just to balance things out, if I can take chainlink and make it a profitable piece of shit in sol, then something bad had to happen
>>59245499>Is the continued war effort costing heavy morale damage to Ukraine and financial burden to NATO (specifically the us)?lol no, NATO is using barely a faction of a percent of it's resources. The only problem is most members thought and wished that the cold war was over and so completely dismantled their military spending, the UK and Germany being the biggest drops. The issue is none of these countries want to go back to the military spending they used to do and so are dancing around it hoping that they won't have to take the plunge but it's totally doable for them to go back to old times. Unfortunately, most journalists don't have any idea and so when the topic of spending comes up their minds are just filled with "Nooooo the hecking welfare state! We need more money for the poor brownorinos and the hecking schools who teach them that white people are bad!" and so the news always portrays military spending as bad and has no idea what the realities of procurement is like.>If they capitulated now, they would not only lose to NATO, they would get dominated by ChinaThey're already dominated by China. They can't keep their economy afloat without Chinese business flooding their markets and taking them to the cleaners. It's really a no win situation but I'm sure Putin will spin it as a moral victory just like the US tried to do when they left Vietnam before it collapsed 2 years later.
>>59243501the only comedian is the circus monkey in moscow who cant win a war against irellevant shithole
>>59249055NATO countries were all basically in debt up to their eyeballs before zelensky started demanding gibs. France and Germany specifically are fucked as far as .mil capacity right now, with the latter resorting to burning wood for fuel last winter because of gross national mismanagement. That doesn't speak to a country willing to increase spending on anything, let alone military hardware (despite them desperately needing to do so). And we're in agreement on just how fucked the whole situation is, but you cannot see that the "fraction of our resources" is already overburdening an overburdened system. I'm not in the tank for Russia, they've been forced, and simultaneously painted themselves, into a corner and the only positive way out right now is to continue the war effort. Last time this gambit failed and collapsed the ussr; this time both of their "soft power" opponents are in fiscally dire straits, so we will see.Also: brics is probably already doomed (at the very most it will make a bipolar trade world again) and that has the potential to do more damage to rus/chi stability and relations than anything else this war would do.
>>59242933We must stop Trump from creating the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve. If he does this, the United States cannot be stopped.
>>59244824trump is gonna cut off Ukraines gibs then they r gonna be fukked lol
