Cba learning up about these things, or what the project is about. i just keep buying it because the banks and asset managers are all talking about it and wave after wave of brownoids keep screeching about it. I had xrp and eth but i've gradually switched it all into Link. Ngl it feels like i did the right thing. Basic psychology. the weird answers to posts like this are a giveaway
>>59245539No need. Everyone holds link. The ones who fud the hardest, hold just as much.
>>59245539Just ask yourself. If the banks and asset managers were really interested in this as an asset, why aren't they buying it? Think really hard about this.By the way I'm not saying they're not interested in the tech stack or in hiring CLL as a third party to hook them up on this crypto thing.
I have a stack of 40k LINK burning a hole in the back of my mind thinking about how I could have bought almost anything else and retired by now.
>>59245539Why isn't the price going up if the banks and asset managers are buying it?
>>59245612Eh, don't blame yourself. We couldn't know they'd centralise and use the token only for their funding, they looked like a honest team back then. It was a gamble anyway.
>>59245539>He thinks the Link fud is ironicNgmi
>Just ask yourself>Think really hard about this>By the way I'm not saying...See? This. What other project attracts this shit? None other project. Maybe i got it all wrong, or maybe the banks did. I'm gonna go with the banks. Simple as.Nothing else attracts this attention on here. I'm all in.
>>59245644So you didn't really think about it. About the facts. Banks aren't buying it. You are just accusing everyone to be a fudder. I k ow it's hard but try to actually think about this and come up with a good reason for it.
>>59245644>babys first shitcoin it's paid speakers and pocs. the fact you dont know this shows you must be new to crypto.
>>59245539>>59245644I also came to these conclusions long ago and it only reinforces the hold I have on my stack.
>>59245656maybe i would have doubted it, but when loads of people tell me to do one thing, i tend to go the other way. it's psychology. kinda like how i never took the vax, yet here we are 4 years later and i'm glad i didn't listen to the people telling me to do one thing.as i said before. whatever chainlink are selling, i'll buy it. simply because of a)the banks and b)people like you telling me not tothis is how i operate and it always works
>>59245539>Guys guys listen guys I found this coin that has lots of articles on the net on how banks will use it it's going to the moon!!Link truly is the new xrp lol
>>59245680>antivaxyep checks out lmao
>>59245692>fudtrannies are vaxxiesChecks out lmao
>>59245684point me to the huge institutional interest xrp has and maybe i'll switch back. it just ain't there, bro. chainlink has all of it. why i'm invested. why i moved to all in
>>59245680No one told you not to buy it bro. Go on, buy it. Its just that we've all been burned with these kind of scams before. It already had its giga pump against btc, and the team never implemented the tokenomics that would drive value in the token, it's all very centralised the team collects the actual little money the network is getting. They only use the token to fund themselves, like xrp. Read the archive if you don't believe me.
>>59245692>checks out lmaowell, i never died and my immune system is in excellent order. i hear not-so good feedback from the mult-ijabbed, but hey// this is about the effectiveness of propaganda. i'm immune. pisses people like you off. i'm unjabbed, have a ton of staked Link, and i attract people like you like flies. who's the loser here?
>>59245704>we've all been burned with these kind of scams before>imagining a room in which the man scammed Swift and the DTCCSorry but i find that too unlikely. why don't you contact them? they'll be so pleased you let them know
>>59245735He didn't scam them. No need to exaggerate. They k ow what they in for. They're probably happy to have a free poc (paid by token holders) so they can show their boss they're working on the shiny new stuff.
>>59245539I have 25k USD in LINK just sitting on coinbase doing literally nothing besides waiting for it to go up. MSTX is up 223.24% just this month. I have come to the realization of the opportunity cost associated with this piece of shit. I can't wait to dump these fucking bags in 2025. I am fully aware of the scope of the project, the token price clearly does not reflect the fundamentals.
>>59245704>n-no one told you not to buythen why do you deranged freaks get so upset and shit out angry paragraphs in response to people saying they will buy? lmfao
>>59245680Lol my brothers whole family is sick with 'covid', all multi vaxxed. I live with them and didnt get sick, no vax. They all get covid like 2 times a year while i never do.
>>59245789Kek - thanks for walking straight into that. i love eliciting responses like this. Job done. Catch you on the flipside dude. Keep buying.
>>59245692See my post above , vaxxies in denial in 2024, lul, lmao even. Happy about RFK in charge of health? Or are you worried you wont get enough jabs?
>>59245845What do you mean? I am just trying to speak the truth. I don't care about shilling or fudding. You have the wrong mindset if you think like that.
>>59245539Based bong.Xrp is a fugazi, it's a literal do nothing abandonware corporate coin that's gaining no traction.Eth is a good platform and will be inevitably a core part of the future of blockchain development, but activity on the base layer is small in comparison (due to speed and cost) of its L2s (which DO hold and pay fees in Eth) and competitor more centralized L1s (Basedlana and Avax among others)Link is a fundamental beast. Truly underrated as fuck, despite fudders and baggies at each other's throats here no one outside of biz gets it, they're too retarded.
>>59245835>VAIDSit's horrendous and i'm so glad i never fell for it. ironically, anyone who was skeptical fared better. even the one who thus far have had no side effects; who knows what the future holds for them? and fertility figures are thin on the ground..imagine the effect on financial investments etc
>>59245862>link is too right curve broIt's been 7 years now, everyone gets it. Advocates are so cringe.
>>59245860don't take it the wrong way, dude. i was just thanking you for being so obvious. don't panic yet
oh look, another link thread full of people insisting holders should:>sell>buy memetokens>not buy more link>seriously whatever you do, don't buy more and sell what you have>check out this funny frog token instead>you don't really think you know more than people with money, do you? if it was worth anything they'd market buy it all at once and make the price skyrocket instead of ... don't worry about it just sell
>>59245692>lines up in rage for its fluoride injection Many such cases
>>592455392025 is the year of the cube. Hope you guys packed your bags.
>>59245874You are clearly here to shill link and are not interested in discussing its flaws. You are not honest. You probably lied about being a first time buyer. One day reality will snap back and you will have to pay for all your lies.
>>59245869>AdvocatesAgreed they're cringe... but I just like the coin unironically and I think the right curve take is accurate. Most retards who buy cryptocurrency have literally 0 understanding of the tech.Look at the market also. STALE as fuck memes like Doge, Pepe, plus absolutely retarded 3rd/4th/5th wave meme coins like BONK, PNUT exploding the last few weeks.Not to mention ancient retarded unused protocol coins like XRP, XLM popping off.The mass normie sentiment cannot get hyped enough en masse to move LINK. I'm guessing they never will. The only thing it has going for it is fundamentals which are unappreciated by anyone who doesn't understand what a blockchain, a Smart contract, and an Oracle is.
>>59245897Thank you so much for your ongoing obsession with my financial investments. I could never have wished for such selfless dedication to one who is a stranger to you. You're the best.PS 74k Link staked. I'd prob have half that if it weren't for your (and your failure pals') constant nagging to sell. I'm not kidding -loads of us are the same. all you did was make us hold and buy more. i guess you 'don't care' though... right? The irony of that kills me. And it happened.
>>59245692YOU KNOW WHO ELSE IS FULLY VACCINATED? CHAIN. LINK. GOD. FROM. TWITTER.
>>59245606>>592456221. Chainlink is intended as a pay-as-you-go service, similar to Azure/AWS/GCP. When banks start using AWS they don't buy a bunch of Amazon stock or pre-pay for a bunch of services.2. Financial disclosures and conflict of interest agreements can prevent insiders from buying.3. We already know people like Sandy from Franklin loaded up years ago. I don't know how much money you think bank employees have, but it's not enough to send the Chainlink market cap to $100 billion.4. People said the same shit about Ethereum when it was under $10. If it was going to be valuable then why aren't bankers, market makers, genius billionaires, etc buying?
>>59245789>these kind of scams beforeThis is what I think you’re saying: So it’s a scam, but he didn’t scam THEM. They’re being super smart, and are actually using him to look good to their bosses. Merely pretending to stay in the loop with current tech. They liked this concept enough to let him try and prove it works. Now that they have proven that it works, and is backwards compatible with their antiquated existing system, they just got a free poc, and can walk away. Why would they? If you’re saying, “tech needed, but coin not”, why spend so little effort to sell the coin?
>>59245539>sells two losers to buy a worse loserbasic psychology indeed
>>59245875it never goes up anymore. NOBODY is buying. because the token simply isn't needed. staking was a meme, economics 2.0 was a meme, build is a meme, cll despises us just like their partners they constantly pander to
>>59245539finally sold my last link stack. call this fud I don't give a fuck. Shits going no where
Also finally bowed out of this shitcoin. I've been holding for close to 5 years now and sure I made a lot of cash on it but I think the ship has sailed.
>>59245918This guy having 74k is the best proof it will never go up again
>>59246523link holders dont realize they're bigger fud than the fuddies ever will be
>>59246523Cope much?
>>59245539Good thread OP, I'm the anon who made the link valuation model (>>59227773) and I broadly agree with you.The thing that makes link different IMO is that it stands on two legs: DeFi and TradFi. It's basically the only coin/token that's riding on this value prop (sans maybe ETH but in a different way).All others either have no real use or stand on only one usecase.For my valuation model, I didn't account for DeFi (because I wanted all assumptions to remain conservative, like no staking, full 1B dilution and so on).But let's say DeFi as a whole does a x10. Then we can expect to see $150 LINK this run.To that IMO you should add about $70 coming from a lil bit of TradFi usage, which results in about $220 LINK this run.If instead of that we get more TradFi usage than expected sooner than expected (+/- speculation), we may see something like $500 LINK this run. At this point, ETH will probably be about $7-12k.Also, consider that if (real) staking with linkies as collateral is dropped then things start to get crazy, but I dunno how to model that (or when it will come) so I leave it out.BTW fudders are just bored holders.
>>59246569cringe see you in a year from today, LINK will keep on stagnating while you'll keep up making excuses and inventing new carrots to dangle on
>>59246569idk how you find the heart anymore man.
>>59245789>k owI don't have to take anything from an overweight phone-fag.How do you like the new captchas?
>>59246569more like>chainlink now powers the world, the singularity is real>price: a cup of coffee
>>59246602Anon, your ancestors are watching, make them proud.
>>59246569>fuddies are bored holders We all know this but we still play along with the act. It's like a medieval dance in which the fuddies have those funny hats with the three prongs and little bells on their feet, prancing around to entertain the court
>>59246655The court jesters you mean. Only they are being paid to tell blatant lies by some (((lord))) and they also have crippling addiction and substance abuse.
>>59245606Conflict of interest
*some* fuddies are bored holders, but the majority of them nowadays are third world trash picked up in the netherlands and stuffed into a marketing (aka stockbashing) post farm where they post on here and on twitter you can tell which is which because the actual oldfags still put effort in and get the old references, while the nufudders are just seething over being called retarded all day and have no meme skills outside of editing booru templates in paint + calling people cucks
>>59246799you just described nushills the linkie cognitive dissonance is astonishing
>>59245606>why aren't they buying it?Who says they aren't?
>>59246803>no Ui mean no one's stopping you from coping and lying about it, but i wouldnt bother trying to convince anyone who sees through your bullshitnow chop chop nufuddie! time to go make sure there's at least 10+ fud threads in the catalog
>>59246832Anyone that was here in 2018 funds this nushill advocate shit really cringe. You don't have to take my word for it, just look around, no meme, no energy, chart nosediving for 5 years straight, twitter shills, telegram shills, normie shit, defending women and brown and muslim people working for chainlink...
>>59246876>AnyoneYou mean you and your many IPs
>>59246876>hops ids>no but U tho really>here's a twitter screencap i found to post on 4chan! yeah man you're so convincingnow quick! you got your new ip, so you better do another round of samefagging in your current fud threads!
>>59246886>>59246888>I... I swear it's just one guy that thinks nulink is cringeMental illness
>>59246904>I... I swear it's just one guyPretty much. You can see him flipping IDs like burgers in every Link thread.
>>59246904>d-dont buy my retarded lies?>ill uh... call you a nulinker again because you called me a nufudder and you're making fun of me for my shitty spam tacticswhoa oh my god im so sorry, "fellow OG"cant believe how obviously wrong i was about you
>>59246910im pretty sure he just deflects because its all he hashe knows he's lying and so does everyone else, so he'll just double down and keep doing the same thing over and over againits like im dealing with an actual kike or something, no one could be dumb enough to think this is convincing
>>59246933Reminds me of picrel
>>59246918So who is this guy? Adem? a Bulgarian ? a mev mafia plant? Does he own all the twitter accounts complaining about Sergey dumping to pay for roasties salaries? Who is this master fudder?Also please white knight picrel dear advocates please ;)
>>59246523He has posted here bragging about his stack for months now. I don't see why there's anything to brag about not cashing out 3.5m at the top.
>>59246973>Does he own all the twitter accounts complaining about Sergey dumping to pay for roasties salaries?I honestly think most of that shit is one guy.It's always him posting his own tweets on here, and then instantly spamming like a dozen IDs all agreeing with himself.He was always obvious, but with the current traffic it's just demented.
>>59245539Keep telling yourself that OP. Meanwhile in reality shatlink has been dropping off a cliff for 5 years. OG’s dumped at $50. $50 will never be reached again, BTC can go to 1mil and you’ll still be crabbing at $10. Why is that? Banks jumped ship, staking failed catastrophically, countless failed larps, zero integration, no partnerships, roadmap delayed decades. The only ones who got lambos were nazarov and the team. >>59246876Based, shitlinkers continue to cope and seethe. These fat cunt rakes in 300k a year as the fat plaid hamburglar continues to dump fat stacks on the unpaid shills heads>>59246886>>59246888>anyone poitning out the failures of shitlink and shitlinks abomination of a price action is the exact same person hopping IDsWow you ponzimarines never cease to amaze me, im paging unc right now, hopefully he hops in to drop a couple nukes on your delusional heads. BTC can touch 100k and shitlink is still tanking. You’re both paying out the salaries for these overpaid landwhales and chastising a based anon who points out that the sky is blue? What the fuck is wrong with you lads? ATH was 5 years ago, you’ve been tanking for half a decade. Pic related, nazarovs father, gifted a lambo by nazarov as you provide liquidity for the dumps
Here he is again >>59247001>1pbtidHow can you be on /biz/ for so many years and still not know how board culture works, and how insanely obvious your samefagging is.
>>59246973>>59247001oh no, he's really upset nowswapping ids twice and shitting out the muh hr roastie angle again, and then more paragraphs that no one will ever read
>>59247012You are mentally ill. Many people hate nulink and its DEI shit funded by dumping tokens. It's not that hard to realise.
i like chainlink and i buy chainlink
>>59247008>>59247012Pure mental illness, you nulinkers are a disgrace. Wake up retards shitlink is going nowhere but sure continue to delude yourself into poverty as you baghold another half decade and bleed infinitely more SATs
>>59247031>Many people hate nulinkIf that's true, then why do you feel the need to switch IDs all the time?
>>59247039>nulinkers badThis implies that you're an "oldlinker">link is going nowhereThis implies that you don't hold Link at all.You see how both of these sentiments can't be true at the same time?
>>59247001>>59247039oh wait up thats schiff lolgot another plane to catch in 5 mins im guessin lil guy? >>59247031yeah bit of friendly fireschiff is OK, and is actually an older poster + at least he has a funny larpyou're still trash though, just stick to spamming the catalog and avoid engaging with people, you arent cut out for it imo
>>59247048Thats right newfag i bought ICO and sold the top at $50 we all couldn’t believe such a shit token could even touch that high. I may buy a bag but only at ICO prices, which at this point it seems inevitable we see ICO prices after BTC tanks
>>59247062Based anon. We are flipping link, everything good about the CL community without the bullshit.
for me its link on sol
>>59245692ok nigger.
>>59245680everyone and their grandma has been shilling this worthless dogshit tokenthat's how you know it's dogshit
>>59246799Thats why its funny whenever these pieces of shit go in overdrive and make 24+ FUD threads in the catalog.>>59245692>fudnigger troons are also boosted jabbiesYou cant make this shit up kek. You are demonic and this is the ultimate proof.To the rest of linkies: picture the swathes of hateful jabbies who tried to get you fired from your job for refusing the vaxx, and banned from social media for dissenting. Now think that most of these demons are also fudtrannies who are trying to get you to sell your LINK.Kill fudders. Behead fudders. Feed fudders into a wood chipper, feet first.
>>59245539°°°misses another bullrun°°°
>>59246569>a x10 is $150 LINKI hate to burst your bubble giga brain, but 14.7 x 10 = 147. Focus on breaking $15 before you even dream of previous ATH, much less 3x that.
OP got the entire fudbrigade out by simply buying more LINK kekeven shiff had to pull out his tripcode for the emergency fud intervention lmao
>>59247969It's over
>>59245684Fucking look elsewhere. LINK got edged out by PYTH DIA SUPRA Redstone.
>>59249959Even if you combined all the shit oracles together, chainlink would still dawrf them.
>its still low $14AAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA>its still low $14AAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA>its still low $14AAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA>its still low $14AAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
>>59250895Are you ok baggie
>>59246569>BTW fudders are just bored holders.I believed everything you were saying until you said this. You sound smart, but then you think the FUDDING is just "bored" holders.LOL
>>59253089As this anon said:>*some* fuddies are bored holdersIt's pretty clear to me that most fudders are bored holders, and then there's the bots/paid indians.BTW I'm not smart and don't know what will happen. Just giving my 2 cents.
>>59246569>For my valuation model, I didn't account for DeFi (because I wanted all assumptions to remain conservative, like no staking, full 1B dilution and so on).You also ignored half the of functionality of SWIFT in handling messages for securities despite that, the new emerging market of tokenzing assets being the most exciting innovation that banks are looking forward to with Chainlink's platform integration. You're seriously underselling how conservative you were being with that chart.
>>59246569How does it make you feel to know that LINK will never be above $100 because history repeats itself and another failed bull run will be manifested?Sergey only knows how to BETRAY, and that's all you will get.
>>59246643Your ancestors are trying to tell you to wake up and focus on the real life you are living right now instead of being trapped by a fake desire of success that won't fulfill your soul.
>>59255725Fair enough.Did you see the recap I posted in my last thread? >>59248192I actually acknowledged that my valuation model was rather conservative, but that's my preference.>>59256248Anon, I don't intend for anyone to stop living their real lives while waiting for some investment to 'moon.' I don't know where you got that idea from.
>>59247001>OG’s dumped at $50i remember when the line was "OG’s dumped at $5" and then "OG’s dumped at $20"
>>59256261From your post selling hopium valuations for a token that has no use.It doesn't matter how many banks or trillions of value use the network if there is no reason to hold the token because only the node operators profit from it and they immediately sell the token.The only thing that could give a slight bit of value for the token holders is staking and Sergey just defaulted on that promise with another missing news this year after promising to release staking v1.0 in 12-24 months 2 years ago.We are going to enter the month of December and reach 2 years with no news.The last time it happened was when Sergey promised staking 3 years ago to force more bag holders and then didn't say anything and let Rori make a hidden announcement of shame on discord 1 year later.The same history will repeat itself because nothing changed.Sergey is still overweight with the wound of humiliation and that's what he will manifest until his death if he doesn't face his beliefs to change them.Chainlink can't moon as long as Sergey is sick because the cult he created carries the same beliefs.If you want freedom you have to change those beliefs and let go.Sell in May or be prepared for BETRAYAL like you have never experienced before.PS: Short like Nexo this time instead of fighting them. They were right.
>>59245606>over $1billion 24 hour volume>nobody is buying your shitcoin guys!Sure thing Ranjeet
>>59256345>The only thing that could give a slight bit of value for the token holders is stakingMost cryptos never had staking, and they did fine. The crypto industry came up without staking.
>>59256345>Sergey is still overweightThe biggest FUD against LINK, IMO, is the very real possibility of Big Serg having a heart attack. Imagine the smell.
>>59256412That would unfortunately be extremely bullish news.It would mean Sergey's failure to learn his life lesson, but the world's decision to manifest success for the investors by replacing him with a healthier figure.It could happen if the investors do the inner work of healing their humiliation wound and Sergey fails to do it.>>59256407Each crypto is a cult for a different set of beliefs and can moon on its own by fulfilling its specific soul contract.The set of rules for Chainlink is different from most other cryptos.Chainlink can't sell a dream like most meme coins do, and can't sell a figure of authority like Elon or Trump do now.Even worse the man who is its face has a wound of humiliation that he keeps manifesting by betraying his promises, and being passive aggressive towards his investors.That's why it has to rely on cold statistics of valuation and value, and that's why it's an absolute failure as a crypto project.There is only one marker that could prove a change in dynamics. Sergey becoming healthy on his own.Not because someone told him to do it, for it to fail and return half a year later, but because that's what he identifies with.Heal your wound of humiliation or be prepared to face it again.
>>59256531Not reading your manic ramblings. Take more meds.
>>59256531You're a funny guy. I smile while reading your posts anon.
>>59245701Arbi hbar xrp tokenizing 5T yes a T in assets. This nigga asks for interest in the ledger after a recent 2x and stablecoin soon to be released.
>>59256701>Arbi hbar xrp tokenizing 5T yes a T in assetsKEK source pls>asks for interest in the ledger after stablecoin soon to be releasedHow does ripple releasing a stablecoin indicate interest?
To Sergay:I want a public apology to your investors for your failed "staking released soon" announcement 3 years ago.Not from Rori or an intern, but from you, publicly, and without hiding behind something or someone else.I want an announcement about the future of staking NOW.Not empty promises with unknown delays.How you see it, what's required for it to work, and how it will look like if adoption happens one day with real and honest information about the time it will take.Your promise and resolve that you will stop running away from your failures and face them honestly and openly without fear.An official statement about the Linkpool rug pull recognizing an unacceptable behavior, promise to not tolerable this in your life and business partners in the future and cutting your business relationship with them and what they represent to the maximum following what's permitted by the law.Do that and I may give you a final chance.If you don't I will go my own way because I don't need you and want healthy people in my life.
>>59256728>HERE ARE MY DEMANDSBuy a stock next time.
>>59256726https://www.cryptopolitan.com/archax-to-offer-tokenized-funds/Lazy nigger
>>59256626People with a humiliation wound can use self derision and self deprecation as an ego protection mechanism.That's the real meaning of your smile.You acknowledge the truth and chose to find it funny rather than to face the core of its meaning.I wish you healing and a life of freedom.The greatest fear of someone with an humiliation wound is freedom.
>>59256750>ArchaxThat's a crypto exchange. I'm pretty sure they don't have 5T.
Do you guys think $15k are possible for link?
>>59256760Exchange broker custodian Its state street and co. You lazy coping mental gymnastics giganigger. I bet you are the same gorilla ape from yesterdays link thread. You dont even READ the post. https://archax-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/archax.com/insights/archax-adds-state-street-fidelity-international-lgim-offerings-to-regulated-digital-platform?hs_amp=true
>>59256784>Its state street and co.Absolutely not. It's Archax trading state street and co.'s products.Trying to claim this is somehow a partnership with State Street and co. is like reselling cans of Coke from a local store and claiming you have a partnership with Coca Cola.
>>59256805Where did i claim that you mongrel. The exchange does not have 5t under management, your argument. Its indeed their products. The point was point me to institutional interest in the xrpl. This is the interest.
>>59256824>Where did i claim thatkek the greentext is a direct quote from your post, dummy.>The point was point me to institutional interest in the xrpl. This is the interest.A crypto exchange doesn't count as an "institution".
>>59256841You are mentally illT5Tokenized Part of it on the xrpl, hbar and arbi No link mentioned. Cope all you want keknigger
>>59256855Archax doesn't have 5 trillion, dumbass. Get it through your thick skull.State street, Fidelity, and LGIM aren't actually involved in this whatsoever.
>>59256889Thats not what i said you linguisticly stunted coping nigger.“We are really pleased to be expanding our offerings by working with blue-chip industry leaders and are excited to be adding the State Street Global Advisors, Fidelity International and LGIM names to our growing list of partners.”– Graham RodfordThey are offering integrated investment products from industry giants State Street Global Advisors, Fidelity International, and Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM). Cope
>>59256931What are you even arguing about? I don't get it.
>>59256931>They are offering integrated investment products from industry giantsYes, Archax is.But they don't have 5 trillion worth of State Street/Fidelity/ LGIM assets.You fucking retard.
>>59256783Possible yes, but not this cycle.Are you the anon in the other thread asking about sui stack numbers?
>>59256961Never said that you ape, idc about archax could be the Simpson family. Its moving on xrpl and hbar
>>59257062>Never said thatYou said 5 trillion was going on xrpl/arbi/hbar.That implies you thought Street/Fidelity/ LGIM were the ones doing the tokenizing.In reality it's Archax doing it, and they have a very low dollar amount of Street/Fidelity/ LGIM assets under management.By the way, wanna know who was actually adopted into live production by Fidelity?
>>59257154It will, in timeStop putting words in my mouth with the implies thought bs, i hold both. Initial point was use of the xrpl. You come in screeching source and then start to twist the wording to cope
>>59257214>Stop putting words in my mouth>you twist the wordingYou said 5T was being tokenized you fucking weasel.
>>59257014Yeah its me am i that obvious?
>>59257224Yes kinda obvious but it's ok.So you have:>5k to spendAnd are wondering:>Are 100LINK enough to make it by 2027?>Do you guys think $15k are possible for link?Which means that you have $1.5M as your 'make it' number.Considering taxes, that's a bit on the low side if you are a burger, though if you are europoor it's good. It's also different is your goal is just not to work vs having a family.As for price estimates, obviously nobody here has a crystal ball.I'd say $15k in 2027 is not impossible (considering TradFi going live, LINK might surpirse everyone) BUT $1-2k seems more realistic.So aiming for at leas 1k linkies seems far more likely to get you from point A to point B.Most important thing IMO is to focus on your education/job/income because if you only have $5k to spend that means you are probably quite young. Do not make crypto the basis of your hope for a good life.
>>59257220All their assets under management will in time be tokenized. Its literally links usecase to facilitate the interopability layer. You want to be right so badly lmao
>>59257267>All their assets under management will in time be tokenizedAll by Archax?
>>59257297No ofc not but we dont know
>>59257390Then there was no source for your 5 trillion, was there?
>>59257443Total assets under management. That will be tokenized. The point about institutions not being interested is also mute now no?
>>59257517Archax doesn't have 5 trillion.You're demented.>The point about institutions not being interested is also mute now no?Your link shows literally 0 institutions being interested.
>>59257580Here we go again. The 3 firms combined have 5t under management. Forget archax ffs. https://ripple.com/ripple-press/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of/Its ok you cant help it. You are neurotic about being right.
>>59257642>The 3 firms combined have 5t under management. Yes but they're not involved in any of this.
>>59257656Archax works with leading financial institutions to enable them to tokenize their financial RWAs. As a result of this collaboration, financial institutions will be able to select the XRPL to tokenize their RWAs, creating opportunities for numerous downstream use cases for these assets.
>>59257715>Archax works with leading financial institutions to enable them to tokenize their financial RWAsNo. The institutions in question are not involved in this.
>>59257266Thank you very much anon, yes i am an euro and 1-1.5Mio would be a good make it number. Thank you for the advice i just got done with my apprenticeship and will start a degree in EE next year, so yeah maybe i am stressing too much about making it at the moment.
>>59258029You definitely are stressing too much. Don't think about your life only beginning when you make it because your life will pass you by while you wait for it to officially begin.
XRP is eating link's lunch
>>59260079Euroclear :)Swift :)DTCC :)
>>59260079Nobody cares about xrp, which is why baggies resort to posting in other cryptos threads
awfully quiet from the linkcels lately...they used to be ubiquitous have they finally made enough gains to afford a rope?
It's ok linkies, you can work in the citadel.
>>59245539Token not required buddy.
